Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 12:01 PM Sep 2015

Ultimately Celibacy Or No Sex Again Is The Only Sure Way To Prevent Getting Pregnant.

The only kind of birth control that works for fundamentalist and guarantees pregnancy prevention 100% is to just have no more sex the rest of your life after you have had the children you want. In the rare cases where pregnancy is a clear danger to health no sex again is the only answer. Sure the "rhythm" method is a way as well but it is far from 100% effective.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ultimately Celibacy Or No Sex Again Is The Only Sure Way To Prevent Getting Pregnant. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Sep 2015 OP
Well I guess it's true, yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #1
Sex is just intercourse now? bluedigger Sep 2015 #2
Rape says "Hi, you forgot about me!" (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #3
Fortunately, I am not a fundamentalist. eom Ichigo Kurosaki Sep 2015 #4
"what do you call people who practice the rhythm method?" "parents" niyad Sep 2015 #5
Some may disagree - edgineered Sep 2015 #6
It's also highly unrealistic. Oneironaut Sep 2015 #7
Or the old snip snip n2doc Sep 2015 #8
Wouldn't They Be Against That, Too? ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #9
I guess even the Rhythm method would be out then n2doc Sep 2015 #11
Yep! ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #13
Yes, they're opposed to that too. n/t gollygee Sep 2015 #12
That is what Mary and Sarah in the bible thought! Sam_Fields Sep 2015 #10
I have many siblings in the Catholic tradition. So does my wife. hunter Sep 2015 #14
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Well I guess it's true,
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 12:05 PM
Sep 2015

But unrealistic and part of marriage is intimacy and yes sex. Otherwise they are just being roommates.

Oneironaut

(5,493 posts)
7. It's also highly unrealistic.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 12:29 PM
Sep 2015

That's why young kids need sex education in schools before they make a life-altering mistake.

ProfessorGAC

(65,012 posts)
9. Wouldn't They Be Against That, Too?
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 12:57 PM
Sep 2015

BC is BC. I know there's a lot of hypocrisy on this matter, but i don't know why they think that form of BC is ok.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
11. I guess even the Rhythm method would be out then
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:16 PM
Sep 2015

I thought most of their objections were that a fertilized egg might not be allowed to implant. Of course, condoms prevent sperm meeting egg, and they hate those.

ProfessorGAC

(65,012 posts)
13. Yep!
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:36 PM
Sep 2015

Both of you are spot on. They're against everything including support money to take care of kids once they're born.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
14. I have many siblings in the Catholic tradition. So does my wife.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:59 PM
Sep 2015

My mom used to drive around with "Choose Life" license plate frames and tell us as fertile young people that even if we made babies by accident to bring them home as family.

Just the thought of bringing new children into my parents household as additional siblings with diapers to change was so terrifying that me and my siblings didn't have children until we could support them on our own.

My parents, and my wife's parents, are both heretics in realizing it's maybe possible there are too many people on this earth.

But as humans of this earth we've all got to accept with love everyone already born, else we are monsters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ultimately Celibacy Or No...