General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFirearms are no longer a hobby of mine
Last edited Thu Oct 15, 2015, 04:57 PM - Edit history (7)
(FYI: I did not write this. I am not that person. -onehandle )
Today I went to my local police station and asked for them to take my guns and have them destroyed.
The task was fairly simple. I explained I had guns I wanted to get rid of at the front desk. They made a copy of my drivers license and then walked out to my car with me to retrieve them. We went into the station to an interview room where we looked at the guns and they wrote down the serial numbers. They looked up the serial numbers to check for any issues, found none, and I left, no longer a gun owner.
[img][/img]
Last week, I sat in a hotel room and watched the President talk about the latest mass shooting and how they had become routine and the concern that nothing would change. I started to shrug it off and pretend in my mind that there was nothing I could do. But the idea that gun culture doesnt bear some responsibility for these killings didnt make sense to me. I didnt want to be a part of gun culture anymore.
I was never going to use these guns for self-defense, they were safely locked and out of reach. I dont hunt. I dont shoot clays. There are no dangerous animals where I live. There are no zombies. Im not a police officer or soldier. I am not part of a well regulated militia. Theres no reason for me to have them.
So I got rid of them. Firearms are no longer a hobby of mine.
http://bit.ly/1L3LaQi
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)were not so difficult due to traffic. As it is, I have to wait for a spot at the noisy, poorly-lit indoor ranges just to sight in my deer rifle.
DocPain
(37 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)You should of seen the looks I got from all the camo swathed gunners! I was violating their manliness for sure!
(I was competing in a nearby race and wanted to check out the possibility of skeet shooting there.)
safeinOhio
(32,675 posts)no one talked to me. I made my point.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)A profile in courage.
murielm99
(30,736 posts)I mean, there is no doubt that everyone else there is armed.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)This editor would send it back with some suggestions about adding what his take on "gun culture" is and whether simply owning "a gun" makes you a part of it, and why he didn't feel a part of whatever it was anymore. Keep digging!
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)So are you suggesting that the guy was a possible threat to society, or that he's too stupid to safely secure his guns -- because it has to be one or the other.
Which is it? How has he served the public in any way with his action? Be specific.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)Were his weapons, locked in their safe, putting out an aura of wickedness or something?
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Depending on the state and locality, police departments do sell firearms they receive from a number of sources. I remember when the New Orleans mayor tried to launch frivolous legal attacks against the firearms industry back in the 90s...only to realize his PD was one of the biggest used Glock resellers in the state.
Darb
(2,807 posts)unless they are antiques. Average, every day firearms of which there are many? Melt them down and use the metal for something more useful. One less loose gun.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)firearms or trade them in and also sell confiscated firearms. I know a few FFLs that specialize in law enforcement trade-ins. You can find a good deal looking at LE trade-ins, but you need to exercise caution as a lot of the firearms are in poor condition.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)I will make my Ruger inoperable before I turn it in.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)I would check the used going rate on GunBroker and see what its going for. Then I would figure out the best way to legally sell it in your state so that:
A) The sale goes through an FFL with a background check, regardless of whether or not your state requires a background check on private sales
B) You get to keep most of the money*
Going through consignment, you usually end up losing a sizable portion of the proceeds. Its often easier to post an online ad, meet the perspective buyer at the sheriffs office (some offices will do this depending on locality) or gun store, have them run the background check and transfer the firearm via the 4473 and any other state paperwork required.
You could donate the proceeds to your favorite charity.
If you really want to destroy it, make sure the police department is actually going to destroy it. Making a firearm inoperable is more difficult than you would expect since the BATFE considers the frame or receiver the gun.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)may be worth hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Darb
(2,807 posts)are worth thousands that are not antiques? I suppose, but I'll compromise, they must be sold to a registered collector. No such thing? Then there should be such a thing and it should be cumbersome and expensive to acquire the designation and the allowances that it provides.
Otherwise, break them down and melt them. Another one out of circulation that some kook will never get his hands on and kill his wife with. Or ten strangers. Or 5 co-workers. Or..................
This is a complex subject but "antique" firearm has a specific definition.
A true antique firearm means that the gun was made before 1899.
A registered collector could be considered someone with a Federal Firearms License (FFL) 03 - Collector of Curios & Relics (C&R). C&Rs are firearms over fifty years old. By possessing such a license they can purchase guns such guns without as much red tape. This requires fingerprints and an application to the ATF and notification to the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the person's local area. It's a pretty neat program, but a lot of FFLs won't do business with FFL 03s, and instead make them follow the regular process as if they didn't have a license. There are FFL 03 friendly FFLs who specialize in doing business with FFL 03s. The license costs $30.00. FFL 03s are required to keep records of the firearms they obtain using the FFL 03.
There are plenty of guns newer than fifty years old that sell to collectors for thousands of dollars.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Cuts into their sales. They would agree with you
onehandle
(51,122 posts)As they should be. The writer doesn't seem like the type to 'mince words.'
jeff47
(26,549 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)medium.com is such a piece of crap. They code it to mess up links, keep you from copying things, or saving web pages.
I wish the article was somewhere else.
I created a bit.ly link.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,185 posts)Congratulations! I heard that Charlize Theron got Sean Penn to have all his guns melted down and made into a sculpture. Too bad they broke up.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Get a few hundred bucks for the guns instead.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)and stop trying to pass off those airsoft pistols as real guns.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Called the city police and said I wanted some guns destroyed. They passed me from desk to desk until I got a dial tone.
Called the county Sheriff's office and they said they never had this happen before and didn't know how to help me.
Finally called the BATF&E who directed me to a program out of a Sheriff's office four counties away who would have the guns cut into three pieces as per the Federal requirement and then melted down to use in such things as manhole covers.
I still own the WWI infantry rifles but the semi auto with interchangeable magazines that are only limited in leathality by the ability to carry ammunition just had no place in my life after 12/14/12.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)There might have been tears shed as they did what you asked.
Throd
(7,208 posts)moondust
(19,979 posts)Just a suggestion for anybody with too much time on their hands after they get rid of their death tools.
K/R
trumad
(41,692 posts)DU..such a Progressive place.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Which is what one would expect on a progressive site.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)The real world vs the preferred world.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I leave that choice to him. I will keep my firearms, that is my choice.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Shame about the guns, he could have rehomed them by selling to co-workers or family he trusted.
The least he could have do was wait for one of those goofy buybacks.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)All he's done is harm himself financially and generate another sale of a new gun for a gun manufacturer. For every gun he destroys rather than sells, that demand will be satisfied by a new gun that is manufactured instead.
stone space
(6,498 posts)I don't make deadly weapons.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)I'd rather not turn this personal. My point is that the same number of guns will be present regardless of what he chooses to do with his guns. He could have just sold them and donated the proceeds to a worthy cause. Instead the proceeds have gone to a gun manufacturer in the form of profit.
stone space
(6,498 posts)...will hopefully have to face their victims in court some day.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)they don't sell directly to the public, by federal law, they can only sell to the Govt. or FFL dealers.
And just in case you missed this:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-105
(a) Findings Congress finds the following:
(1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
(2) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not members of a militia or engaged in military service or training, to keep and bear arms.
(3) Lawsuits have been commenced against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms that operate as designed and intended, which seek money damages and other relief for the harm caused by the misuse of firearms by third parties, including criminals.
(4) The manufacture, importation, possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States are heavily regulated by Federal, State, and local laws. Such Federal laws include the Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act [26 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.], and the Arms Export Control Act [22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.].
(5) Businesses in the United States that are engaged in interstate and foreign commerce through the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, importation, or sale to the public of firearms or ammunition products that have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce are not, and should not, be liable for the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse firearm products or ammunition products that function as designed and intended.
(6) The possibility of imposing liability on an entire industry for harm that is solely caused by others is an abuse of the legal system, erodes public confidence in our Nations laws, threatens the diminution of a basic constitutional right and civil liberty, invites the disassembly and destabilization of other industries and economic sectors lawfully competing in the free enterprise system of the United States, and constitutes an unreasonable burden on interstate and foreign commerce of the United States.
(7) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, and private interest groups and others are based on theories without foundation in hundreds of years of the common law and jurisprudence of the United States and do not represent a bona fide expansion of the common law. The possible sustaining of these actions by a maverick judicial officer or petit jury would expand civil liability in a manner never contemplated by the framers of the Constitution, by Congress, or by the legislatures of the several States. Such an expansion of liability would constitute a deprivation of the rights, privileges, and immunities guaranteed to a citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
(8) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, private interest groups and others attempt to use the judicial branch to circumvent the Legislative branch of government to regulate interstate and foreign commerce through judgments and judicial decrees thereby threatening the Separation of Powers doctrine and weakening and undermining important principles of federalism, State sovereignty and comity between the sister States.
(b) Purposes The purposes of this chapter are as follows:
(1) To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and their trade associations, for the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended.
(2) To preserve a citizens access to a supply of firearms and ammunition for all lawful purposes, including hunting, self-defense, collecting, and competitive or recreational shooting.
(3) To guarantee a citizens rights, privileges, and immunities, as applied to the States, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to section 5 of that Amendment.
(4) To prevent the use of such lawsuits to impose unreasonable burdens on interstate and foreign commerce.
(5) To protect the right, under the First Amendment to the Constitution, of manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and trade associations, to speak freely, to assemble peaceably, and to petition the Government for a redress of their grievances.
(6) To preserve and protect the Separation of Powers doctrine and important principles of federalism, State sovereignty and comity between sister States.
(7) To exercise congressional power under article IV, section 1 (the Full Faith and Credit Clause) of the United States Constitution.
A qualified civil liability action may not be brought in any Federal or State court.
(b) Dismissal of pending actions
A qualified civil liability action that is pending on October 26, 2005, shall be immediately dismissed by the court in which the action was brought or is currently pending.
(1) Engaged in the business
The term engaged in the business has the meaning given that term in section 921(a)(21) of title 18, and, as applied to a seller of ammunition, means a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to the sale of ammunition as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of ammunition.
(2) Manufacturer
The term manufacturer means, with respect to a qualified product, a person who is engaged in the business of manufacturing the product in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a manufacturer under chapter 44 of title 18.
(3) Person
The term person means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity, including any governmental entity.
(4) Qualified product
The term qualified product means a firearm (as defined in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 921(a)(3) of title 18), including any antique firearm (as defined in section 921(a)(16) of such title), or ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17)(A) of such title), or a component part of a firearm or ammunition, that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
(5) Qualified civil liability action
(A) In general The term qualified civil liability action means a civil action or proceeding or an administrative proceeding brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, punitive damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, abatement, restitution, fines, or penalties, or other relief, resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of a qualified product by the person or a third party, but shall not include
(i) an action brought against a transferor convicted under section 924(h) of title 18, or a comparable or identical State felony law, by a party directly harmed by the conduct of which the transferee is so convicted;
(ii) an action brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se;
(iii) an action in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought, including
(I) any case in which the manufacturer or seller knowingly made any false entry in, or failed to make appropriate entry in, any record required to be kept under Federal or State law with respect to the qualified product, or aided, abetted, or conspired with any person in making any false or fictitious oral or written statement with respect to any fact material to the lawfulness of the sale or other disposition of a qualified product; or
(II) any case in which the manufacturer or seller aided, abetted, or conspired with any other person to sell or otherwise dispose of a qualified product, knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the actual buyer of the qualified product was prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm or ammunition under subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 of title 18;
(iv) an action for breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the product;
(v) an action for death, physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product, when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner, except that where the discharge of the product was caused by a volitional act that constituted a criminal offense, then such act shall be considered the sole proximate cause of any resulting death, personal injuries or property damage; or
(vi) an action or proceeding commenced by the Attorney General to enforce the provisions of chapter 44 of title 18 orchapter 53 of title 26.
(B) Negligent entrustment
As used in subparagraph (A)(ii), the term negligent entrustment means the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows, or reasonably should know, the person to whom the product is supplied is likely to, and does, use the product in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to the person or others.
(C) Rule of construction
The exceptions enumerated under clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A) shall be construed so as not to be in conflict, and no provision of this chapter shall be construed to create a public or private cause of action or remedy.
(D) Minor child exception
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the right of a person under 17 years of age to recover damages authorized under Federal or State law in a civil action that meets 1 of the requirements under clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A).
(6) Seller The term seller means, with respect to a qualified product
(A) an importer (as defined in section 921(a)(9) of title 18) who is engaged in the business as such an importer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such an importer under chapter 44 of title 18;
(B) a dealer (as defined in section 921(a)(11) of title 18) who is engaged in the business as such a dealer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a dealer under chapter 44 of title 18; or
(C) a person engaged in the business of selling ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17)(A) of title 18) in interstate or foreign commerce at the wholesale or retail level.
(7) State
The term State includes each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States, and any political subdivision of any such place.
(8) Trade association The term trade association means
(A) any corporation, unincorporated association, federation, business league, professional or business organization not organized or operated for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual;
(B) that is an organization described in section 501(c)(6) of title 26 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such title; and
(C) 2 or more members of which are manufacturers or sellers of a qualified product.
(9) Unlawful misuse
The term unlawful misuse means conduct that violates a statute, ordinance, or regulation as it relates to the use of a qualified product.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)doesn't make it so.
Besides, the PLCAA protects them from frivolous lawsuits that blame them for the criminal of negligent misuse of their perfectly legal product.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)just because you say so, doesn't make it so.
Darb
(2,807 posts)obtuse you would like to be.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)doesn't make it so.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You should apply that bumper-sticker response to yourself, too.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)other threads
hunter
(38,311 posts)... guns and money.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I do not see any here
hunter
(38,311 posts)Yes, I am mocking you.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and people wonder why.......................
hunter
(38,311 posts)People with gun fetishes annoy me.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)But I do own some firearms. Several are antiques.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Air Defense Artillery Branch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Defense_Artillery_Branch_%28United_States%29
an air defender is nicknamed a duckhunter
I worked HAWK, Patriot and now THAAD
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)and sometimes our own "Duckhunters".
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and once again, welcome home
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)always good to learn a new thing
snooper2
(30,151 posts)OLD SCHOOL!
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)that have 'homes'.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)patsimp
(915 posts)The gun epidemic is caused by the association of the visible display of the gun and the flag - as if guns are patriotic. They are not. Nothing of he kind. Having them glorified like that is making us drown in the gun lovers (as opposed to gun owners) stupidity.
Omaha Steve
(99,621 posts)barbtries
(28,789 posts)Kaleva
(36,298 posts)I have a couple of Mosin Nagants of which I've never fired or bought ammo for. I haven't hunted in decades, don't target shoot and I don't need them or any gun for home/self defense either.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Bought it, cleaned off a spectacular amount of packing grease, made it look as pretty as a slapdash Soviet rifle could, and never once bothered to buy a round of ammunition for it. I just like owning something that might have fought the fascists. I'll never fire a single shot with it, ever.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Them at paper plates. Do have a nice kick.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)Lost it in a house fire. It kicked like a mule and after I shot a few rounds with it, I cleaned it and never fired it again.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)and they are about the cheapest war era rifles one can buy in good to very good condition.
Both of mine are still coated in cosmoline. One of these days I'll clean them up and maybe buy a few rounds and actually fire them.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)May others follow where you lead.
sarisataka
(18,633 posts)I tend to do less shooting over the cold months and work more on my trains.
With luck I will have something similar to this before the end of winter
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)sarisataka
(18,633 posts)I took apart my last layout to start over. I am going for the same prairie town look.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)to the hobby, so I paint miniature soldiers and make terrain for wargaming with them; lots of similarities to model railroading.
sarisataka
(18,633 posts)with War hammer and WW2 figures. We find we can exchange our extras and scraps for the other to use.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Some amazing layouts on youtube
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Rather shameful that the sentiment is applied much more to inanimate objects than it is to women's health services.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)hunter
(38,311 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Because, yes sir, you look like one scary neighbor in that pic.
cadaverdog
(228 posts)For your well reason decision. A few more like you and we might have the beginnings of a movement.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)...that will make the gun makers happy because they get to make replacement guns.
Well, I guess making an empty gesture is more valuable than, say, selling the guns and donating to money to a good cause.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Gonzalo
(13 posts)Prevention and education are the weapons we really need.