Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 03:59 PM Oct 2015

Firearms are no longer a hobby of mine

Last edited Thu Oct 15, 2015, 04:57 PM - Edit history (7)

(FYI: I did not write this. I am not that person. -onehandle )

Today I went to my local police station and asked for them to take my guns and have them destroyed.

The task was fairly simple. I explained I had guns I wanted to get rid of at the front desk. They made a copy of my driver’s license and then walked out to my car with me to retrieve them. We went into the station to an interview room where we looked at the guns and they wrote down the serial numbers. They looked up the serial numbers to check for any issues, found none, and I left, no longer a gun owner.

[img][/img]

Last week, I sat in a hotel room and watched the President talk about the latest mass shooting and how they had become routine and the concern that nothing would change. I started to shrug it off and pretend in my mind that there was nothing I could do. But the idea that gun culture doesn’t bear some responsibility for these killings didn’t make sense to me. I didn’t want to be a part of gun culture anymore.

I was never going to use these guns for self-defense, they were safely locked and out of reach. I don’t hunt. I don’t shoot clays. There are no dangerous animals where I live. There are no zombies. I’m not a police officer or soldier. I am not part of a well regulated militia. There’s no reason for me to have them.

So I got rid of them. Firearms are no longer a hobby of mine.

http://bit.ly/1L3LaQi

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Firearms are no longer a hobby of mine (Original Post) onehandle Oct 2015 OP
cool story, now he can take up pruning snooper2 Oct 2015 #1
Well at least we don't have to worry about him. yeoman6987 Oct 2015 #30
Doesn't sound like it was much of a hobby in the first place. mwrguy Oct 2015 #2
I'd increase my shooting activities if the area ranges weren't so packed, and getting there... Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #3
Did you wear that outfit? DocPain Oct 2015 #4
I once visited a gun range in my mountainbike outfit... Human101948 Oct 2015 #16
I wore an Obama tee shirt safeinOhio Oct 2015 #45
A tip of the hat to you! Human101948 Oct 2015 #79
I would worry. murielm99 Oct 2015 #89
This is an essay by someone else that the OP posted. nt MADem Oct 2015 #26
The personal essay has really gone downhill in the age of the Internet. Brickbat Oct 2015 #5
Holy crap -- a gun owner with a profound sense of the greater good? Unicorns are more common. villager Oct 2015 #6
A profound sense of the greater good? pablo_marmol Oct 2015 #76
In what way are you suggesting that he served the greater good? TipTok Oct 2015 #82
Hopefully the PD sells them for a fair price. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #7
They should be dismantled and recycled, Darb Oct 2015 #11
Many police departments sell their used Kang Colby Oct 2015 #15
Good to know... Human101948 Oct 2015 #18
Depending on what you have, it may be worth hundreds of dollars. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #20
Some of those every day firearms ... Kang Colby Oct 2015 #21
I made a caveat for antiques. Are there others that Darb Oct 2015 #80
Yes. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #94
Gun makers hate used guns hack89 Oct 2015 #28
It says he took them to be destroyed in the first sentence. onehandle Oct 2015 #22
To make the link clickable, change the @ to %40 (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #8
Doesn't work. onehandle Oct 2015 #24
Wow, I just saw a flying pig! TexasBushwhacker Oct 2015 #9
He should have waited for a gun buyback Travis_0004 Oct 2015 #10
Not everyone is as venal as you are... Human101948 Oct 2015 #19
It wasn't that easy for me to get rid of the semi-auto pistols I had. flamin lib Oct 2015 #12
You could have taken your guns to a local machine shop and paid them to cut them in half. Snobblevitch Oct 2015 #71
His choice. I'll keep mine. Throd Oct 2015 #13
Tennis and golf don't kill people. moondust Oct 2015 #14
Be prepared for the attack from the usual suspects. trumad Oct 2015 #17
Civil rights of all kinds are supported here hack89 Oct 2015 #29
I agree Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #38
Well......all kinds except for one. pablo_marmol Oct 2015 #77
Why he can do what he wants Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #32
Wonder what model bike he rides??? ileus Oct 2015 #23
Does he realize we can just make more? LittleBlue Oct 2015 #25
Define "we". stone space Oct 2015 #27
Not really relevant to my point, is it? LittleBlue Oct 2015 #34
His guns won't kill anybody, ever. The manufacturers you are speaking of... stone space Oct 2015 #40
The manufactures don't have victims, GGJohn Oct 2015 #53
Arms manufacturers have many, many victims. stone space Oct 2015 #57
Just because you say they do, GGJohn Oct 2015 #58
You defend the indefensible (nt) stone space Oct 2015 #74
Again, GGJohn Oct 2015 #83
Sure they do, regardless of how Darb Oct 2015 #81
Again, just because you say so, GGJohn Oct 2015 #84
You should apply that response to yourself, too. LanternWaste Oct 2015 #90
I wish you would pay that close attention to Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #37
I see the usual complaints here from people who think he violated their most sacred icons... hunter Oct 2015 #31
show me one Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #33
Of course you don't, dear. hunter Oct 2015 #35
nice and civil of you Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #36
I've got nothing against hunters. hunter Oct 2015 #39
I don't hunt Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #41
Why call yourself Duck Hunter? Weird. nt Logical Oct 2015 #62
Not really Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #63
As I said before, your counterparts were the ones that I feared, GGJohn Oct 2015 #65
I am so glad they were bad shots Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #68
Thank you. eom. GGJohn Oct 2015 #70
OK, sorry, my bad. I had no idea. Learned something today, thanks!! nt Logical Oct 2015 #67
no harm Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #69
real humans hunt using their bare hands...and teeth snooper2 Oct 2015 #66
In #23, someone wishes they had been "rehomed", as if they were living creatures muriel_volestrangler Oct 2015 #98
I applaud him. Some gunners here have a bunch of guns, tote, and even need one riding a bike. Hoyt Oct 2015 #42
Good for you. patsimp Oct 2015 #43
K&R! Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #44
applause barbtries Oct 2015 #46
I don't need them either Kaleva Oct 2015 #47
I have one of those myself. Codeine Oct 2015 #49
Have two, enjoy shootout Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #50
I had a Mosin Nagant M44 carbine once Kaleva Oct 2015 #86
The only reason I bought them was 'cause of my interest in military history Kaleva Oct 2015 #85
Thank you. milestogo Oct 2015 #48
Hobbies change over time sarisataka Oct 2015 #51
Looks great Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #52
I wish that one was mine... sarisataka Oct 2015 #54
you will get there Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #59
I love model trains but I've never wanted to commit Codeine Oct 2015 #55
My friend does that sarisataka Oct 2015 #56
Same here Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #60
Glad to live in a country where there is a choice to keep or not to keep. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #61
Choice is always a good thing Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #64
Rather shameful that the sentiment is applied much more to inanimate objects LanternWaste Oct 2015 #91
I'm not ashamed. I believe in a woman's absolute right to health services. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #92
Excellent!! Initech Oct 2015 #72
Many artists make sculptures from guns... hunter Oct 2015 #73
La Escopetarra stone space Oct 2015 #75
And we're all supposed to care because................... (NT) pablo_marmol Oct 2015 #78
Because we're not all you. nt Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2015 #95
All I can say is THANK GOD! vkkv Oct 2015 #87
Thank you cadaverdog Oct 2015 #88
So this person just took an expensive loss... krispos42 Oct 2015 #93
Thank you for making a safer world! ellisonz Oct 2015 #96
Thank you but not the answer for the problem Gonzalo Oct 2015 #97
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
3. I'd increase my shooting activities if the area ranges weren't so packed, and getting there...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:04 PM
Oct 2015

were not so difficult due to traffic. As it is, I have to wait for a spot at the noisy, poorly-lit indoor ranges just to sight in my deer rifle.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
16. I once visited a gun range in my mountainbike outfit...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:55 PM
Oct 2015

You should of seen the looks I got from all the camo swathed gunners! I was violating their manliness for sure!

(I was competing in a nearby race and wanted to check out the possibility of skeet shooting there.)

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
5. The personal essay has really gone downhill in the age of the Internet.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:05 PM
Oct 2015

This editor would send it back with some suggestions about adding what his take on "gun culture" is and whether simply owning "a gun" makes you a part of it, and why he didn't feel a part of whatever it was anymore. Keep digging!

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
76. A profound sense of the greater good?
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 02:07 AM
Oct 2015

So are you suggesting that the guy was a possible threat to society, or that he's too stupid to safely secure his guns -- because it has to be one or the other.

Which is it? How has he served the public in any way with his action? Be specific.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
82. In what way are you suggesting that he served the greater good?
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 08:44 AM
Oct 2015

Were his weapons, locked in their safe, putting out an aura of wickedness or something?

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
7. Hopefully the PD sells them for a fair price.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:06 PM
Oct 2015

Depending on the state and locality, police departments do sell firearms they receive from a number of sources. I remember when the New Orleans mayor tried to launch frivolous legal attacks against the firearms industry back in the 90s...only to realize his PD was one of the biggest used Glock resellers in the state.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
11. They should be dismantled and recycled,
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:27 PM
Oct 2015

unless they are antiques. Average, every day firearms of which there are many? Melt them down and use the metal for something more useful. One less loose gun.

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
15. Many police departments sell their used
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:54 PM
Oct 2015

firearms or trade them in and also sell confiscated firearms. I know a few FFLs that specialize in law enforcement trade-ins. You can find a good deal looking at LE trade-ins, but you need to exercise caution as a lot of the firearms are in poor condition.



 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
20. Depending on what you have, it may be worth hundreds of dollars.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 05:25 PM
Oct 2015

I would check the used going rate on GunBroker and see what its going for. Then I would figure out the best way to legally sell it in your state so that:

A) The sale goes through an FFL with a background check, regardless of whether or not your state requires a background check on private sales
B) You get to keep most of the money*

Going through consignment, you usually end up losing a sizable portion of the proceeds. Its often easier to post an online ad, meet the perspective buyer at the sheriffs office (some offices will do this depending on locality) or gun store, have them run the background check and transfer the firearm via the 4473 and any other state paperwork required.

You could donate the proceeds to your favorite charity.

If you really want to destroy it, make sure the police department is actually going to destroy it. Making a firearm inoperable is more difficult than you would expect since the BATFE considers the frame or receiver the gun.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
80. I made a caveat for antiques. Are there others that
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 08:11 AM
Oct 2015

are worth thousands that are not antiques? I suppose, but I'll compromise, they must be sold to a registered collector. No such thing? Then there should be such a thing and it should be cumbersome and expensive to acquire the designation and the allowances that it provides.

Otherwise, break them down and melt them. Another one out of circulation that some kook will never get his hands on and kill his wife with. Or ten strangers. Or 5 co-workers. Or..................

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
94. Yes.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 04:07 PM
Oct 2015

This is a complex subject but "antique" firearm has a specific definition.

A true antique firearm means that the gun was made before 1899.

A registered collector could be considered someone with a Federal Firearms License (FFL) 03 - Collector of Curios & Relics (C&R). C&Rs are firearms over fifty years old. By possessing such a license they can purchase guns such guns without as much red tape. This requires fingerprints and an application to the ATF and notification to the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the person's local area. It's a pretty neat program, but a lot of FFLs won't do business with FFL 03s, and instead make them follow the regular process as if they didn't have a license. There are FFL 03 friendly FFLs who specialize in doing business with FFL 03s. The license costs $30.00. FFL 03s are required to keep records of the firearms they obtain using the FFL 03.

There are plenty of guns newer than fifty years old that sell to collectors for thousands of dollars.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
22. It says he took them to be destroyed in the first sentence.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 05:41 PM
Oct 2015

As they should be. The writer doesn't seem like the type to 'mince words.'

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
24. Doesn't work.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 05:46 PM
Oct 2015

medium.com is such a piece of crap. They code it to mess up links, keep you from copying things, or saving web pages.

I wish the article was somewhere else.

I created a bit.ly link.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,185 posts)
9. Wow, I just saw a flying pig!
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:13 PM
Oct 2015

Congratulations! I heard that Charlize Theron got Sean Penn to have all his guns melted down and made into a sculpture. Too bad they broke up.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
19. Not everyone is as venal as you are...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 05:04 PM
Oct 2015

and stop trying to pass off those airsoft pistols as real guns.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
12. It wasn't that easy for me to get rid of the semi-auto pistols I had.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:46 PM
Oct 2015

Called the city police and said I wanted some guns destroyed. They passed me from desk to desk until I got a dial tone.

Called the county Sheriff's office and they said they never had this happen before and didn't know how to help me.

Finally called the BATF&E who directed me to a program out of a Sheriff's office four counties away who would have the guns cut into three pieces as per the Federal requirement and then melted down to use in such things as manhole covers.

I still own the WWI infantry rifles but the semi auto with interchangeable magazines that are only limited in leathality by the ability to carry ammunition just had no place in my life after 12/14/12.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
71. You could have taken your guns to a local machine shop and paid them to cut them in half.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 11:40 PM
Oct 2015

There might have been tears shed as they did what you asked.

moondust

(19,979 posts)
14. Tennis and golf don't kill people.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:52 PM
Oct 2015

Just a suggestion for anybody with too much time on their hands after they get rid of their death tools.

K/R

hack89

(39,171 posts)
29. Civil rights of all kinds are supported here
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:03 PM
Oct 2015

Which is what one would expect on a progressive site.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
32. Why he can do what he wants
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:07 PM
Oct 2015

I leave that choice to him. I will keep my firearms, that is my choice.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
23. Wonder what model bike he rides???
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 05:44 PM
Oct 2015

Shame about the guns, he could have rehomed them by selling to co-workers or family he trusted.

The least he could have do was wait for one of those goofy buybacks.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
25. Does he realize we can just make more?
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 05:54 PM
Oct 2015

All he's done is harm himself financially and generate another sale of a new gun for a gun manufacturer. For every gun he destroys rather than sells, that demand will be satisfied by a new gun that is manufactured instead.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
34. Not really relevant to my point, is it?
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:19 PM
Oct 2015

I'd rather not turn this personal. My point is that the same number of guns will be present regardless of what he chooses to do with his guns. He could have just sold them and donated the proceeds to a worthy cause. Instead the proceeds have gone to a gun manufacturer in the form of profit.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
40. His guns won't kill anybody, ever. The manufacturers you are speaking of...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:33 PM
Oct 2015

...will hopefully have to face their victims in court some day.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
53. The manufactures don't have victims,
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:43 PM
Oct 2015

they don't sell directly to the public, by federal law, they can only sell to the Govt. or FFL dealers.
And just in case you missed this:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-105


(a) Findings Congress finds the following:
(1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

(2) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not members of a militia or engaged in military service or training, to keep and bear arms.

(3) Lawsuits have been commenced against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms that operate as designed and intended, which seek money damages and other relief for the harm caused by the misuse of firearms by third parties, including criminals.

(4) The manufacture, importation, possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States are heavily regulated by Federal, State, and local laws. Such Federal laws include the Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act [26 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.], and the Arms Export Control Act [22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.].

(5) Businesses in the United States that are engaged in interstate and foreign commerce through the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, importation, or sale to the public of firearms or ammunition products that have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce are not, and should not, be liable for the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse firearm products or ammunition products that function as designed and intended.

(6) The possibility of imposing liability on an entire industry for harm that is solely caused by others is an abuse of the legal system, erodes public confidence in our Nation’s laws, threatens the diminution of a basic constitutional right and civil liberty, invites the disassembly and destabilization of other industries and economic sectors lawfully competing in the free enterprise system of the United States, and constitutes an unreasonable burden on interstate and foreign commerce of the United States.

(7) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, and private interest groups and others are based on theories without foundation in hundreds of years of the common law and jurisprudence of the United States and do not represent a bona fide expansion of the common law. The possible sustaining of these actions by a maverick judicial officer or petit jury would expand civil liability in a manner never contemplated by the framers of the Constitution, by Congress, or by the legislatures of the several States. Such an expansion of liability would constitute a deprivation of the rights, privileges, and immunities guaranteed to a citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

(8) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, private interest groups and others attempt to use the judicial branch to circumvent the Legislative branch of government to regulate interstate and foreign commerce through judgments and judicial decrees thereby threatening the Separation of Powers doctrine and weakening and undermining important principles of federalism, State sovereignty and comity between the sister States.

(b) Purposes The purposes of this chapter are as follows:
(1) To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and their trade associations, for the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended.

(2) To preserve a citizen’s access to a supply of firearms and ammunition for all lawful purposes, including hunting, self-defense, collecting, and competitive or recreational shooting.

(3) To guarantee a citizen’s rights, privileges, and immunities, as applied to the States, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to section 5 of that Amendment.

(4) To prevent the use of such lawsuits to impose unreasonable burdens on interstate and foreign commerce.

(5) To protect the right, under the First Amendment to the Constitution, of manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and trade associations, to speak freely, to assemble peaceably, and to petition the Government for a redress of their grievances.

(6) To preserve and protect the Separation of Powers doctrine and important principles of federalism, State sovereignty and comity between sister States.

(7) To exercise congressional power under article IV, section 1 (the Full Faith and Credit Clause) of the United States Constitution.


(a) In general

A qualified civil liability action may not be brought in any Federal or State court.

(b) Dismissal of pending actions

A qualified civil liability action that is pending on October 26, 2005, shall be immediately dismissed by the court in which the action was brought or is currently pending.


(1) Engaged in the business

The term “engaged in the business” has the meaning given that term in section 921(a)(21) of title 18, and, as applied to a seller of ammunition, means a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to the sale of ammunition as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of ammunition.

(2) Manufacturer

The term “manufacturer” means, with respect to a qualified product, a person who is engaged in the business of manufacturing the product in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a manufacturer under chapter 44 of title 18.

(3) Person

The term “person” means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity, including any governmental entity.

(4) Qualified product

The term “qualified product” means a firearm (as defined in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 921(a)(3) of title 18), including any antique firearm (as defined in section 921(a)(16) of such title), or ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17)(A) of such title), or a component part of a firearm or ammunition, that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

(5) Qualified civil liability action
(A) In general The term “qualified civil liability action” means a civil action or proceeding or an administrative proceeding brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, punitive damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, abatement, restitution, fines, or penalties, or other relief, resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of a qualified product by the person or a third party, but shall not include—
(i) an action brought against a transferor convicted under section 924(h) of title 18, or a comparable or identical State felony law, by a party directly harmed by the conduct of which the transferee is so convicted;

(ii) an action brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se;

(iii) an action in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought, including—
(I) any case in which the manufacturer or seller knowingly made any false entry in, or failed to make appropriate entry in, any record required to be kept under Federal or State law with respect to the qualified product, or aided, abetted, or conspired with any person in making any false or fictitious oral or written statement with respect to any fact material to the lawfulness of the sale or other disposition of a qualified product; or

(II) any case in which the manufacturer or seller aided, abetted, or conspired with any other person to sell or otherwise dispose of a qualified product, knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the actual buyer of the qualified product was prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm or ammunition under subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 of title 18;

(iv) an action for breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the product;

(v) an action for death, physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product, when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner, except that where the discharge of the product was caused by a volitional act that constituted a criminal offense, then such act shall be considered the sole proximate cause of any resulting death, personal injuries or property damage; or

(vi) an action or proceeding commenced by the Attorney General to enforce the provisions of chapter 44 of title 18 orchapter 53 of title 26.

(B) Negligent entrustment

As used in subparagraph (A)(ii), the term “negligent entrustment” means the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows, or reasonably should know, the person to whom the product is supplied is likely to, and does, use the product in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to the person or others.

(C) Rule of construction

The exceptions enumerated under clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A) shall be construed so as not to be in conflict, and no provision of this chapter shall be construed to create a public or private cause of action or remedy.

(D) Minor child exception

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the right of a person under 17 years of age to recover damages authorized under Federal or State law in a civil action that meets 1 of the requirements under clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph (A).

(6) Seller The term “seller” means, with respect to a qualified product—
(A) an importer (as defined in section 921(a)(9) of title 18) who is engaged in the business as such an importer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such an importer under chapter 44 of title 18;

(B) a dealer (as defined in section 921(a)(11) of title 18) who is engaged in the business as such a dealer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a dealer under chapter 44 of title 18; or

(C) a person engaged in the business of selling ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17)(A) of title 18) in interstate or foreign commerce at the wholesale or retail level.

(7) State

The term “State” includes each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States, and any political subdivision of any such place.

(8) Trade association The term “trade association” means—
(A) any corporation, unincorporated association, federation, business league, professional or business organization not organized or operated for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual;

(B) that is an organization described in section 501(c)(6) of title 26 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such title; and

(C) 2 or more members of which are manufacturers or sellers of a qualified product.

(9) Unlawful misuse

The term “unlawful misuse” means conduct that violates a statute, ordinance, or regulation as it relates to the use of a qualified product.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
58. Just because you say they do,
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 10:02 PM
Oct 2015

doesn't make it so.
Besides, the PLCAA protects them from frivolous lawsuits that blame them for the criminal of negligent misuse of their perfectly legal product.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
90. You should apply that response to yourself, too.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:04 PM
Oct 2015

You should apply that bumper-sticker response to yourself, too.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
31. I see the usual complaints here from people who think he violated their most sacred icons...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:04 PM
Oct 2015

... guns and money.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
65. As I said before, your counterparts were the ones that I feared,
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 10:22 PM
Oct 2015

and sometimes our own "Duckhunters".

patsimp

(915 posts)
43. Good for you.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:38 PM
Oct 2015

The gun epidemic is caused by the association of the visible display of the gun and the flag - as if guns are patriotic. They are not. Nothing of he kind. Having them glorified like that is making us drown in the gun lovers (as opposed to gun owners) stupidity.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
47. I don't need them either
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:51 PM
Oct 2015

I have a couple of Mosin Nagants of which I've never fired or bought ammo for. I haven't hunted in decades, don't target shoot and I don't need them or any gun for home/self defense either.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
49. I have one of those myself.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 07:07 PM
Oct 2015

Bought it, cleaned off a spectacular amount of packing grease, made it look as pretty as a slapdash Soviet rifle could, and never once bothered to buy a round of ammunition for it. I just like owning something that might have fought the fascists. I'll never fire a single shot with it, ever.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
86. I had a Mosin Nagant M44 carbine once
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:27 AM
Oct 2015

Lost it in a house fire. It kicked like a mule and after I shot a few rounds with it, I cleaned it and never fired it again.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
85. The only reason I bought them was 'cause of my interest in military history
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:24 AM
Oct 2015

and they are about the cheapest war era rifles one can buy in good to very good condition.

Both of mine are still coated in cosmoline. One of these days I'll clean them up and maybe buy a few rounds and actually fire them.

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
51. Hobbies change over time
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:37 PM
Oct 2015

I tend to do less shooting over the cold months and work more on my trains.

With luck I will have something similar to this before the end of winter

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
54. I wish that one was mine...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:48 PM
Oct 2015

I took apart my last layout to start over. I am going for the same prairie town look.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
55. I love model trains but I've never wanted to commit
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:49 PM
Oct 2015

to the hobby, so I paint miniature soldiers and make terrain for wargaming with them; lots of similarities to model railroading.

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
56. My friend does that
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:52 PM
Oct 2015

with War hammer and WW2 figures. We find we can exchange our extras and scraps for the other to use.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
91. Rather shameful that the sentiment is applied much more to inanimate objects
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:06 PM
Oct 2015

Rather shameful that the sentiment is applied much more to inanimate objects than it is to women's health services.

cadaverdog

(228 posts)
88. Thank you
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 01:24 PM
Oct 2015

For your well reason decision. A few more like you and we might have the beginnings of a movement.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
93. So this person just took an expensive loss...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 07:54 PM
Oct 2015

...that will make the gun makers happy because they get to make replacement guns.


Well, I guess making an empty gesture is more valuable than, say, selling the guns and donating to money to a good cause.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Firearms are no longer a ...