ACA Birth Control Benefit Heads Back to the Supreme Court (the war on women continues apace)

[niyad]

ACA Birth Control Benefit Heads Back to the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court today agreed to hear arguments from religiously affiliated non-profits challenging women’s right to access insurance coverage for birth control under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The non-profits seeking to deny women employees access to birth control argue that the requirement to fill out a ONE-page form to receive an exemption from covering birth control places a substantial burden on their exercise of religion and violates Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).





“Birth control is basic health care for women. These challenges are not about religion. There is no law in the United States that allows an employer, even a religiously-affiliated non-profit, to impose a religious belief on an employee,” said Feminist Majority President Eleanor Smeal. “Plain and simple, these cases are about sex discrimination and whether or not religion – in the United States – can still be used as a cover to discriminate against women. Will we have equal rights and democracy for everyone, or will we have democracy for men and theocracy for women?”

Under the ACA, health insurance companies must cover the full cost of all FDA-approved contraceptives – including the pill, IUDs, and emergency contraception – without requiring co-pays or cost-sharing. Religious employers, like churches, are already entirely exempt from this requirement. Religiously affiliated non-profits that object to providing birth control coverage to their employees are entitled to an accommodation that relieves them of their obligation to cover birth control.

To qualify for the accommodation, religiously affiliated non-profits must only inform their health insurance issuer, third party administrator, or the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – via a simple government form – that it objects to providing insurance coverage for birth control. At that point, these organizations are no longer required to play any role in providing or subsidizing birth control. The insurance issuer or third party administrator would be solely responsible for providing birth control benefits to affected employees. (heaven forfend that these woman-haters should spend one minute PROVING their hatred for women)

SEVEN federal appeals courts have ruled that it is not a violation of RFRA the for a religiously affiliated non-profit to fill out a form indicating that it objects to providing insurance coverage for birth control. Only one court, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, has sided with the non-profits.

. . . . .

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/11/06/aca-birth-control-benefit-heads-back-to-the-supreme-court/

[COLGATE4]

1. Chip...Chip...Chip... nt

[niyad]

5. more like sledgehammers.

[COLGATE4]

6. Yep. Now that the bible-thumpers have finally gotten

a Circuit Court of Appeals to agree with them and bump it up to the 5-4 Supremes.

[cantbeserious]

2. Thank You For Sharing

eom

[frazzled]

3. Not to worry. Come the revolution ...

when the billionaire class has been abolished, the Wall Street execs imprisoned, and income equality eradicated, this will take care of itself.

Women, stand back. We're handling this for you.

[niyad]

4. so kind of you.

[immoderate]

7. SCOTUS is dominated by primitives. The passive aggression of fundies works for them.

--imm