General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissouri State Rep Files Bill to Put Gun Sales Under Exact Same Restrictions as Abortions
As St. Louis magazine reports, Newman has pre-filed a bill for the upcoming legislative session that would subject gun buyers to the exact same restrictions currently faced by people seeking abortions.
You can read the full text of House Bill 1397 here; it sweetly proposes that gun buyers have a 72-hour waiting period imposed upon them, and have to confer and discuss with a licensed physician and risk factors that might arise from the proposed firearm purchase:
Prior to any firearm purchase in this state, a prospective firearm purchaser shall, at least seventy-two hours prior to the initial request to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearm dealer located at least one hundred twenty miles from such purchasers legal residence, confer and discuss with a licensed physician the indicators and contraindicators and risk factors, including any physical, psychological, or situational factors, that may arise with the proposed firearm purchase. Such physician shall then evaluate the prospective firearm purchaser for such indicators and contraindicators and risk factors and determine if such firearm purchase would increase such purchasers risk of experiencing an adverse physical, emotional, or other health reaction.
Gun buyers would also have to watch a 30-minute video on fatal firearm injuries and verify in writing that he or she viewed the entire video in the presence of a licensed firearm dealer. Theres more:
Verify in writing by a licensed physician that the purchaser has toured an emergency trauma center in the nearest qualified urban hospital on a weekend between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. when gun violence victims are present.
Within seventy-two hours of a firearm purchase, the prospective firearm purchaser shall meet with at least two families who have been victims of violence involving a firearm and two local faith leaders who have officiated, within the past year, a funeral of a victim of violence involving a firearm who was under the age of eighteen
http://theslot.jezebel.com/missouri-state-rep-files-bill-to-put-gun-sales-under-ex-1746030454?utm_expid=66866090-71.ZDl_b8uGQgG7HBI5sxDRgQ.0
It's a start.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)the vote.
just in case. Go, Rep Newman !!!
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)Have to tour an abortion clinic during a time when abortions are being performed and meet with at least two women who have had abortions before they are allowed to have one themselves? That seems pretty draconian/illegal.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)The MO law is the most drastic in the country, I know that much.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)I can't believe any court would find that constitutional (if it were enacted).
eppur_se_muova
(36,264 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Gun owners are mostly men. Let's have women who don't even own guns make future laws for men and their gun dysfunction.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)OMG.....LMBO....
What a great choice of words!
DLevine
(1,788 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)I can hear the gun humper's sphincter knotting happening already!
Freddie
(9,267 posts)...probe of some sort.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)catrose
(5,068 posts)Augiedog
(2,548 posts)niyad
(113,323 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)Doc_Technical
(3,526 posts)as fully automatic weapons.
It appears that most mass murders are committed by
people using semi-automatic handguns and long guns.
DebbieCDC
(2,543 posts)Excellent strategy
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)is unfortunate.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Hope she succeeds in making people pay attention to the idiocy of gun-nuts...or is that lack of nuts?...
Gloria
(17,663 posts)Keeping the same hoops to jump through...
I mean, why the hell not???? The Rethugs seem to have no issue shoving crap legislation....why not something good like this, Demmies????
It would also make a great ad!!!
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)We've been saying this is what should happen and she's doing it
Awesome!!!
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)I've never understood the pooh-poohing about waiting periods. The 2nd Amendment doesn't say "the right to bear arms right away," so I think the (mis)interpretation that waiting periods somehow infringe one's right to bear arms may be... what.... revisionist?
==============
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)the more influence, power and money the NRA accrues.
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)They must think owning a gun makes someone more amenable to their control.
But, really, their raison d'être is to represent gun manufacturers anyway, not gun owners. The whole point pushed by the NRA (and your gun show sellers and your local gun shop) when they foment fears about the gubmint coming to take your guns or about how it would be a safer world if everyone had a gun, they are not overly concerned with your safety and security or reducing crime -- they just want to make money by selling guns.
===========================
Nitram
(22,803 posts)...an ultar-sound wand to insure they have no dangerous contraband on their person (or is that "in" .
Gumboot
(531 posts)... put your feet in these stirrups, relax, and tell us why you need a weapon of mass destruction...
Oh, and your family can click a link to watch your rectal ultrasound live on Periscope."
Good work, Rep. Newman!
NCjack
(10,279 posts)people choosing to live as women. I know that some men who are not TG will take advantage of this loophole and declare to be TG to avoid the restrictions on their guns, but there really isn't a perfect way to draw this line.
daybranch
(1,309 posts)get over the feminist supporter jollies, two wrongs do not make a right or make it fair. Apply to everyone seeking to buy a gun.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 5, 2015, 10:44 PM - Edit history (1)
got pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
that's some pepsi out of my nose! It is sad that is
funny....
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)It will clearly save lives.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)You know, a brain scan.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)Praek3
(149 posts)1. No health insurance coverage for any/all gun injuries for gun owners unless they pay an extra and specific premium for insurance coverage. Just like many feel is appropriate for women to have birth control coverage within their health insurance policies.
2. No federal funds permitted to be used to cover gun owner related gun injuries or deaths. If you want a gun and are injured by your gun, pay for any negative results by yourself. Just as no federal funds can be used to pay for abortion services.
Fair is fair.
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)Not afraid of legislating. How refreshing!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Elmergantry
(884 posts)There should be NO restrictions to the constitutional right to have an abortion.
Same with firearms.