General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPentagon Task Force Spent Nearly $150M on Villas and 3-Star Meals in Afghanistan
Remember this (along with a million other things) the next time some wingnut or 3rd-way-er starts bloviating about how we just can't afford to pay teachers, or build roads, or pay for a social safety net.
In a letter to Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter made public Thursday, SIGAR chief John Sopko wrote that members of the Defense Departments Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO) could have used accommodations available on local military bases and other U.S. government facilities, adding that it was unclear what benefit the U.S. received as the result of TFBSOs decision.
From 2009 until it was disbanded this year, TFBSO was entrusted with rebuilding post-war Afghanistans business infrastructure, receiving roughly $766 million from Congress to do so.
Amazingly, former TFBSO employees told SIGAR investigators that the $150 million spent on accommodations in Afghanistan fully 20 percent of the task forces total budget supported no more than 5 to 10 employees.
https://theintercept.com/2015/12/03/pentagon-task-force-spent-nearly-150m-on-villas-and-3-star-meals-in-afghanistan/
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)phantom power
(25,966 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)They try to pretend, at least for the media, that they're all in it together but try to find a general in any hot area that doesn't drive around in air conditioned luxury when the cameras aren't around, not gonna happen.
If you've ever seen Apocalypse Now the most revealing scene in there about brass is when Willard (Martin Sheen) gets his orders from a General, CIA spook and the General's aide (Harrison Ford). They're eating dinner consisting of perfectly cooked steak, shrimp and alcohol in a really nice villa. They casually discuss killing Kurtz but don't even stop chewing.
General Corman is the perfect example of a military General IMO>
karynnj
(59,503 posts)underlying problems. http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/compass/articles/2015/6/17/john-sopko-sigar.html There has been a huge amount of waste in money spent on Afghanistan. Note in particular the "logic" of we have spent a trillion dollars -- that we "lose" if we were to leave early. The man leading it sounds good and honest -- but, it seems that the US effort has for years been subject to being completely incompetent and having no checks that insured that what we pay for was really done.
Another sobering comment was that the total expenditures of services by Afghanistan is 4 to 5 times higher than the revenue the government takes in. While some of that cost may be fraud and waste, it is not clear that even if they got their act together and everything was clean, that they could afford these basic services on their own.
Excerpt with both points:
We have a trillion-dollar investment [in Afghanistan]. That includes the war fighting, which cost a lot more than the reconstruction. We lost 2,000 Americans, and many more wounded. SIGAR and the other oversight agencies are like insurance polices. We dont cost that much, but we are the insurance policy for the entire $1 trillion. And if they cut back too much, we could lose it all.
Lose it all meaning lose Afghanistan?
Lose Afghanistan. The government could collapse. They raise $2 billion a year. It costs $8 [billion] to $10 billion to pay for their military, their police, their schools, highways and all of that.
roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)They are talking about closing the commissaries.
This is criminal.
Initech
(100,079 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)a year salary. I don't even know why they bothered to investigate, nothing ever happens and it goes right back to business as usual.
olddots
(10,237 posts)the defence department used to be called the war department .