Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:20 AM Dec 2015

Pentagon Task Force Spent Nearly $150M on Villas and 3-Star Meals in Afghanistan

Remember this (along with a million other things) the next time some wingnut or 3rd-way-er starts bloviating about how we just can't afford to pay teachers, or build roads, or pay for a social safety net.

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) is asking why a small Department of Defense task force charged with developing the Afghan economy spent nearly $150 million on private villas, security guards and luxury meals while operating in the country between 2010 and 2014.

In a letter to Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter made public Thursday, SIGAR chief John Sopko wrote that members of the Defense Department’s Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO) could have used accommodations available on local military bases and other U.S. government facilities, adding that it was “unclear what benefit the U.S. received as the result of TFBSO’s decision.”

From 2009 until it was disbanded this year, TFBSO was entrusted with rebuilding post-war Afghanistan’s business infrastructure, receiving roughly $766 million from Congress to do so.

Amazingly, former TFBSO employees told SIGAR investigators that the $150 million spent on accommodations in Afghanistan — fully 20 percent of the task force’s total budget — supported “no more than 5 to 10” employees.

https://theintercept.com/2015/12/03/pentagon-task-force-spent-nearly-150m-on-villas-and-3-star-meals-in-afghanistan/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon Task Force Spent Nearly $150M on Villas and 3-Star Meals in Afghanistan (Original Post) phantom power Dec 2015 OP
It's what the locals expect to see. PeoViejo Dec 2015 #1
Like Atrios said: "The war was great! Everybody got rich!" phantom power Dec 2015 #2
The brass always does pretty well sharp_stick Dec 2015 #3
The problem is bigger than that -- here is an article that speaks to the fundamental karynnj Dec 2015 #4
While this is happening, roscoeroscoe Dec 2015 #5
Hey Republicans! This is wasteful government spending!! Initech Dec 2015 #6
Because no one is really in control of the MIC and it does as it pleases on a 600 billion Rex Dec 2015 #7
the tip of their melting ice berg olddots Dec 2015 #8

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
3. The brass always does pretty well
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:13 AM
Dec 2015

They try to pretend, at least for the media, that they're all in it together but try to find a general in any hot area that doesn't drive around in air conditioned luxury when the cameras aren't around, not gonna happen.

If you've ever seen Apocalypse Now the most revealing scene in there about brass is when Willard (Martin Sheen) gets his orders from a General, CIA spook and the General's aide (Harrison Ford). They're eating dinner consisting of perfectly cooked steak, shrimp and alcohol in a really nice villa. They casually discuss killing Kurtz but don't even stop chewing.

General Corman is the perfect example of a military General IMO>

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
4. The problem is bigger than that -- here is an article that speaks to the fundamental
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:39 AM
Dec 2015

underlying problems. http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/compass/articles/2015/6/17/john-sopko-sigar.html There has been a huge amount of waste in money spent on Afghanistan. Note in particular the "logic" of we have spent a trillion dollars -- that we "lose" if we were to leave early. The man leading it sounds good and honest -- but, it seems that the US effort has for years been subject to being completely incompetent and having no checks that insured that what we pay for was really done.

Another sobering comment was that the total expenditures of services by Afghanistan is 4 to 5 times higher than the revenue the government takes in. While some of that cost may be fraud and waste, it is not clear that even if they got their act together and everything was clean, that they could afford these basic services on their own.

Excerpt with both points:


We have a trillion-dollar investment [in Afghanistan]. That includes the war fighting, which cost a lot more than the reconstruction. We lost 2,000 Americans, and many more wounded. SIGAR and the other oversight agencies are like insurance polices. We don’t cost that much, but we are the insurance policy for the entire $1 trillion. And if they cut back too much, we could lose it all.

Lose it all — meaning lose Afghanistan?

Lose Afghanistan. The government could collapse. They raise $2 billion a year. It costs $8 [billion] to $10 billion to pay for their military, their police, their schools, highways and all of that.
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
7. Because no one is really in control of the MIC and it does as it pleases on a 600 billion
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:27 PM
Dec 2015

a year salary. I don't even know why they bothered to investigate, nothing ever happens and it goes right back to business as usual.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon Task Force Spent...