Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 08:41 AM Jan 2016

The Militia HAS Made An Implied Threat. And The Act Like They Now Own The Site.

These militia have said they want no violence. However they have pretty much made it clear that they will resist if there is ANY interference with them and their occupation of the site. It can be assumed that they would not throw rocks if confronted. And their rhetoric makes it clear that ALL authorities dare not show up.

Their present makes it necessary to keep the sanctuary closed to the public. The sanctuary may be very remote but it is a symbol of active resistance and they have called for others to support them and the idea of taking public property for THEIR own use.

What if they had taken a site like the Petrified Forest and said that local should be able to use it as they like even taking the petrified wood and selling it locally? Other federal land is vulnerable to this same maybe.

At some point the situation will have to be addressed and it may not be pretty. It appears they want a Ruby Ridge or Waco situation as a call to arms.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Militia HAS Made An Implied Threat. And The Act Like They Now Own The Site. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Jan 2016 OP
The place is always closed over the winter anyway Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #1
If they happen to survive, arrest them on their way out of town. Vinca Jan 2016 #3
No, remove them from federal property. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #6
Why is federal property sacred ground pintobean Jan 2016 #9
If they happen to be on state property--remove them Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #10
Would the same apply to occupiers and BLM protesters? pintobean Jan 2016 #11
Occupiers and BLM protesters are not armed to the teeth. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #14
But, they are legally armed, are they not? pintobean Jan 2016 #16
I get it. You want to mess with me. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #18
That wasn't very nice, let pinto go on! sub-thread just got started! snooper2 Jan 2016 #21
Sub-thread could use a dumb pintobean Jan 2016 #24
Your irascible and choleric hobgoblin mention by Emerson is also shared by little statesmen. LanternWaste Jan 2016 #25
Actually no they aren't chalmers Jan 2016 #29
When did OWS or BLM use guns and threaten violence against the government? The officials randys1 Jan 2016 #26
"Hours The Refuge is open each day from sunrise to sunset." Blues Heron Jan 2016 #8
That the entire refuge- the visitors center and buildings are closed for the winter. Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #13
And you just make the next group want to do it again.... Logical Jan 2016 #12
Fire self-deploying Razorwire cannisters into the area so they can't get out. Then drop books on Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #20
No, it has reduced winter hours but it is not closed all winter. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #23
If there is any utility service to the site, cut it off. liberal N proud Jan 2016 #2
I'm thinking of taking over one jberryhill Jan 2016 #4
Now THAT is truly scary! pinboy3niner Jan 2016 #7
I think the law is if you are a white male con, you are entitled to any govt land anywhere anytime randys1 Jan 2016 #27
What they're really annoyed about is they are being mocked and/or ignored..nt monmouth4 Jan 2016 #5
I'm glad they are being mocked, but I hope the Feds aren't really ignoring Nay Jan 2016 #17
I think we should surround them with a fence Generic Other Jan 2016 #15
Now that's good idea! ribrepin Jan 2016 #32
"No justice. No peace" is also an implied threat. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #19
"We will use force against those who attempt to remove us" is NOT and "implied" threat. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #22
Your Take Is More Correct TheMastersNemesis Jan 2016 #31
They think they want a Ruby or Waco deal, but the instant the bullets started flying they randys1 Jan 2016 #28
If they were black or brown they would have been all killed by drone strike by now. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #30
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
1. The place is always closed over the winter anyway
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 08:43 AM
Jan 2016

Let them freeze for a few months. Cut off access in and out, jam any electronic signals to keep them from getting on social media or seeing any news, and let them freeze and be bored to death.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
11. Would the same apply to occupiers and BLM protesters?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 09:39 AM
Jan 2016

I agree with you, but uniform enforcement isn't very popular here.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
24. Sub-thread could use a dumb
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jan 2016

irrelevant video. Whatcha got?

Edit - never mind, it's no longer needed.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
25. Your irascible and choleric hobgoblin mention by Emerson is also shared by little statesmen.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jan 2016

Your irascible and choleric hobgoblin mention by Emerson is also shared by little statesmen.

 

chalmers

(288 posts)
29. Actually no they aren't
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jan 2016

They are trespassing on Federal land. They are committing this act while armed which is also a felony.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
26. When did OWS or BLM use guns and threaten violence against the government? The officials
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

of the organizations?

Not one lone loud mouth who would have been instantly denounced.

Answer is never, none.

BLM and OWS were and are righteous, wonderful movements and some folks hate them and I know why.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
13. That the entire refuge- the visitors center and buildings are closed for the winter.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 09:42 AM
Jan 2016

And evidently they are letting anyone and everyone mingle among them,

I think its funny that LE hasn't even publicly shown up yet. That has to be throwing them all off because they haven't gotten any of the response they wanted.

At the same time I am sure that there are unseen assets who are figuring out what radios frequencies they are using, listening to those, listening to cell phones and mapping all sorts of valuable intel during the period when everyone thinks they are not doing anything.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
12. And you just make the next group want to do it again....
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 09:39 AM
Jan 2016

Give them 2 week notice and then remove them and send them to prison.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
20. Fire self-deploying Razorwire cannisters into the area so they can't get out. Then drop books on
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

the Donner Party on them, after all we want them to be entertained.

Drop a single fifty pound bag of potatoes on them once every two weeks -we don't want them to totally starve; just be very very uncomfortable.
Set up ear shattering music 24/7 Muslim Devotional Chants would be best.
Set up communication jammers and then wait for Spring.
Also hand them bill's for the use of Federal Property as they crawl out.

Oh, and then Arrest them.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
2. If there is any utility service to the site, cut it off.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 08:46 AM
Jan 2016

Why should the government pay for utilities?
Water
Electricity
Gas

By the time spring comes, they will be needing to get back to the ranch.

Speaking of the ranch, who is tending their livestock while they are playing terrorist?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. I'm thinking of taking over one
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 08:48 AM
Jan 2016

Obviously, I have misunderstood how these wildlife refuges work.

They are apparently there for "whatever", and according to the Constitution I'm entitled to go take one over for whatever purpose I want.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
27. I think the law is if you are a white male con, you are entitled to any govt land anywhere anytime
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jan 2016

BTW, most of these types are using our lands and paying very little for what they gain from using them.

Personally, I would like to double federal lands overnight.

As in increase the amount of land owned by the feds by doubling the amount.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
17. I'm glad they are being mocked, but I hope the Feds aren't really ignoring
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jan 2016

them. This is the second time they have pulled a militia stunt; the next time, they may be bold enough to do something that will truly require a response, and it'll get ugly. Face it, no one else is allowed to take over Fed property and get ignored. Imagine if homeless people decided to shelter there -- shit, they'd be dragged out in 24 hours. I know the Feds don't want martyrs among these gun-humping assholes, but jeezus. There really is more at stake here than a closed bird sanctuary.

ribrepin

(1,726 posts)
32. Now that's good idea!
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:02 AM
Jan 2016

Bet they can't wait to get out. On second thought, they would probably come out shooting.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
22. "We will use force against those who attempt to remove us" is NOT and "implied" threat.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:05 PM
Jan 2016

It is a DIRECT threat when the person making it is armed with firearms.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
28. They think they want a Ruby or Waco deal, but the instant the bullets started flying they
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jan 2016

would do anything to call it off.

The threat is not implied, it is a direct threat that would guarantee the death or long time imprisonment if a BLM supporter did this

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Militia HAS Made An I...