General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe NRA is backing terrorism: Wingnuts and “patriots” are the real safety threat we should fear
The NRA is backing terrorism: Wingnuts and patriots are the real safety threat we should fearby Melissa Duclos-Yourdon at Salon
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/05/the_nra_is_backing_terrorism_wingnuts_and_patriots_are_the_real_safety_threat_we_should_fear/
"SNIP..............
Its hard to debate the point, given the NRAs success in blocking public safety research into guns. Prior to 1996, however, when that research ban was passed, the CDC concluded that in households where guns were present, family members were three times as likely to be shot as those who live in homes without guns. More recently, a Stanford University study found that right-to-carry laws were linked to an increase in violent crime; and researchers from the University of California, Davis, and the University of Newcastle in Australia, using data from the 2013 FBI crime report and gun control laws by state, concluded that homicide rates in cities within states that require a permit to buy a gun are lower than those in cities within states that do not require permits. And the National Journal, citing data from the CDC, the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, and the NRA-ILA, reported that states with more restrictive gun laws have the fewest gun-related deaths.
This researchwhich is to say these factsdont matter to the gun extremists who argue for their unassailable right to own guns. After they claim that gun legislation is ineffective, they will shriek about the Constitution, failing to see the illogic in the argument that an amendment is something that must never be changed. Writing in Psychology Today in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre, David Ropeik explains that the extremists who speak of clutching their guns with their cold, dead hands are fighting for the right to own a gun [as] a way of asserting control against a society that many feel is encroaching on their values and freedoms. To such extremists, the right to bear arms is not one of many constitutional rights. It is the most important right, through which all other rights must be defended.
Simply put, the right to own a gun is the right to stand up against the government. For example, heavy artillery has made it possible this week for terrorists to occupy a federal building in Oregon, to stand against the perceived tyranny of having to pay (at a rate 93 percent lower than the average market rate) for the use of federal lands for grazing.
Here these men are, exercising their freedoms behind the barrels of their guns. All of their talk of tyranny makes it very clear then what the debate over guns in this country is really about: When gun extremists resist the commonsense legislation that would curb gun violence, they are fighting for their freedom to break the law. (Its a freedom, its worth noting, only available to whites in this country, as people of colorchildren of colordo not have the freedom to hold even toy guns without being shot by police.) Claiming to stand against tyranny, gun extremistsbacked by the NRA and the rest of the gun lobbyare the real tyrants, holding Americans hostage, putting our lives in danger.
...............SNIP"
randys1
(16,286 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)What heavy artillery?
Where did these loons get 155mm artillery?
Does the author of this article even know what the fuck they're talking about? Didn't Salon proof read this crap?
linuxman
(2,337 posts)They fired all the fact checkers so they could pay the privilege checkers.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)applegrove
(118,656 posts)innocents than innocents killed by radical muslims?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)what's your point?
Also, WTF is the author of this Salon article talking about heavy artillery?
Doesn't Salon fact check their articles before they go to print?
applegrove
(118,656 posts)the big white man taking their wages and jobs and economy and forcing a gun culture on them because it is a GOP wedge issue. More gun owners family members die at the hands of their own guns than than use it to actually defend themselves from outsiders.
Really? Got stats and links for that claim?
applegrove
(118,656 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)but I already see a glaring error, there are not over 50,000 firearm deaths each year in the US, it's more like 30,000, of which 2/3 of those are suicides.
Of course having a firearm in the home increases the danger of being shot, but the same could be said of having a vehicle, it increases the chances of having an accident.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)In fact, that's pretty much Intro to Statistics. Yes, I'm well 'aware' of it. Salon is still a joke. I used to think it was credible, but the kind of toxic tripe they push now is D&C shill territory. No thanks.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)They are waving their fetish at us while children, families, and other normal people are dying at an alarming rate.
hack89
(39,171 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I'm laughing at you, not slaughter.
Reading comprehension is your friend.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)The NRA is not some all powerful deity and isn't he boogeyman. If you want to blame someone for not getting gun laws passed then blame your state and federal representatives. As far as I know they are the ones that cast the vote, not the NRA.