General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow would you feel if a Nazi swastika was on your child's assigned reading?
Last edited Wed Jan 6, 2016, 12:09 AM - Edit history (1)
My child showed me the book they are reading in class ON EDIT "Someone Named Eva" and I was shocked.
Synopsis - a girl is one of 100,000 children who go through health inspections in occupied Czechoslovakia. Her features are determined to be "perfectly Aryan" so she, and others, are taken to be brainwashed (scrubbed really) and then adopted into the families of Nazis. Her named is changed to Eva. She has no memory of who she was. The war ends of course and she returns to her true family.
From our quick review we (my wife and I) see that this book is a means of conveying the horrific Nazi thinking and tactics with a main character that children in our kid's class can associate. The book appears to be well regarded.
My child's class is studying WWII. This is part of the curriculum. Today they also had an "enrichment" class on the uses of propaganda. My wife said, "That's one of your Daddy's favorite subjects" I added, " just turn on the TV". Our child said, "That's what he (the enrichment teacher) said too". The teacher used modern advertising as examples.
I know we have to teach history but that symbol in this context should not be on the cover in my opinion. Not on an assigned well used book from a school system. We found other versions of this book without Nazi symbolism on them. The book my child showed me was literally "dog eared" - it had dog bite marks on one corner. If you are wondering, this school system is not wanting for money - every kid in all the high schools is assigned a laptop computer and that is a lot of kids.
I have emailed the teacher (who is fantastic) of our concerns on this. I also put tape over the Nazi flag that shows part of the swastika.
Thoughts?
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)Your daughter will see a swastika eventually. Sounds like the context is good.
msongs
(67,405 posts)short lesson on where it came from and some of its meanings would be helpful.
covering it up just adds to the allure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)the Second World War without encountering the swastika.
Its being on the cover of a book wouldn't seem to me to be an endorsement of the Third Reich or its philosophy.
underpants
(182,803 posts)That's it. Yes it should and is show in this class to be a symbol of horribleness but I am not having my kid seen with a swastika.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)good understanding of how the symbol as used / abused by the Third Reich, that knowledge and understanding wins over the symbol.
By high school, there are a few kids who will plunge whole-hog into a period of history. I think it's a good idea to encourage their exploration. If the swastika is removed from a book cover, it's still an active force inside the pages of the book.
Students might be asked in class what power the symbol had in Germany during that period, and if there is a difference to allegiance to one's country and allegiance to a symbol.
Ms. Toad
(34,072 posts)expressed your concerns more clearly than your OP. Until I hit this post, I had no clue that your concern was not the author's/publisher's choice of cover art (which seems entirely appropriate, based on your description of the book) - but that you don't want your child to be required to carry a visible swastika.
underpants
(182,803 posts)Thanks
wordpix
(18,652 posts)You're missing the point imo. Getting upset at a symbol of evil is not the point. Discussing the events is.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I don't understand what the objection would be.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That which the symbol represents.
Without seeing the cover I dont know the presentation, but it certainly doesnt sound like the book is promoting Nazi ideology; and that's the rub on things like this, namely context.
There's nothing magic, nothing Voldemort-like about any particular word or symbol. It is what they represent, and the context in which they are presented, what makes all the difference.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)If so, maybe rent Louis Malle's film "Au revoir, les enfants."
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-au-revoir-les-enfants-1987
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)emotionally understated which makes it emotionally devastating.
The school depicted was Malle's school. He was eye witness to just such events.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)me, at least, this is his best.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)depending how old are the kids. They should know what that was.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Most students will see numerous swastikas before graduating high school because WWII is a major focus of study in history and literature classes in most American schools. As long as they are not promoting the symbol there is nothing wrong with it.
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)I put tape over the Nazi flag that shows part of the swastika
Thoughts? Guess I'm just thinking about that action !
Book reviews no one mentions the cover but that it is good historical fiction
Review has cover of the book I believe you referenced
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1328363.Someone_Named_Eva
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Maybe take the time to explain the swastika's ancient origins and different symbolism.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Her class is studying WWII. What is this swastika going to do, exactly? Start rotating at high speed, separate from the book, and buzz saw someone's fingers off?
That is not out of the realm of possibilities.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)...appropriate context, the red and white Nazi flag with the black swastika or any other variant they specifically used), then it is even more important to teach the lesson of its appearance. Taping something over it is just going to make you look, well, like you think symbols are 'of the devil' or something. There's no FEAR attached to the symbol that we don't give it.
As for the other types of swastikas, as they are literally found over the entire world, I wouldn't bat an eye. It's a very prominent Buddhist symbol, among other religions. I suspect I am somewhat of a minority in this thought.
Just my thoughts on the subject of course. Good luck in whatever decision you choose.
underpants
(182,803 posts)Especially when there are other versions available.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)Post-it and other companies make them.
TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)groundloop
(11,519 posts)Taken in the proper context this can be a good learning opportunity.
RandySF
(58,823 posts)My high school History teacher went over WWII in excruciating detail because he was determined that no student of his would NEVER FORGET. And now I worry a bit that millennial parents are going to shield their children's eyes from swastikas and anything else that might offend sheltered sensibilities. Nazism is ugly as hell but t's something the world should never be allowed to hide it, or its symbols, under the rug. Trust me, the Holocaust Museum hasn't covered it up.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Unfortunately, a symbol that has been around for eons became inextricably linked with Naziism. But it has and it doesn't help our children to shelter them from it.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)is like censoring "To Kill a Mockingbird" to remove the n-word.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)that Hitler and the Nazis appropriated it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
That being said, I see nothing wrong with the use of Nazi symbolism in a story about WWII. The Nazis used it so it belongs in the story.
Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)it from another religion, who borrowed it from yet another religion... and so on. I just read something about it the other day, and it had a graph that showed some different religions, as well as other Countries that used it.
That's my 2 cents worth on the subject...
Peace,
Ghost
roody
(10,849 posts)Flatpicker
(894 posts)Like the correct place to deal with it.
On the cover of a book that deals with WW2 history and the Nazi's role in it.
Can't go on hiding images we don't like. Best to let the light shine on them and explain why they are as reviled as they are.
DFW
(54,378 posts)They went to the Anne Frank Grundschule in our town near Düsseldorf. They learned all about the Nazis, Anne Frank, the whole WWII story. Not only that, their grandfather, my father-in-law, was drafted off his farm into the Wehrmacht at age 17. He was sent to Stalingrad and returned minus a leg at age 18, unable ever to work on his beloved farm again.
The East Germans washed their hands of their past, said that there were only good Socialists there and no more Nazis. So when the wall came down, guess where most of German neo-Nazis were to be found? Right there in the part of Germany that had refused to confront its past. Better every child knows what happened and how horrible it was. Hiding it accomplishes nothing except creating forbidden fruit.
earthside
(6,960 posts)The cover seems appropriate to me.
Putting tape over the Nazi flag smacks of censorship ... do you see the irony in what you have done?
Someone Named Eva
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1328363.Someone_Named_Eva
underpants
(182,803 posts)Thanks. That's the cover.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)I think the girl's uneasy (to say the least) expression overshadows the flag behind her.
I am sensitive to the display of a swastika. My copy of Rise and Fall of the Third Reich looks like this:
The stark black-white contrast is pretty eye-grabbing and without knowing what the book is about, it can give the wrong impression.
I had the copy with me when I went to college and left it sitting out in my room. When one of my new roommates (who was Jewish) saw it from across the room, he demanded to know what the hell it was that I was reading. Probably making it worse, I have what can be called Aryan features (blond hair, etc.). I explained to him what it was and the situation was defused (we actually became pretty good friends), but I've always been very self-conscious of this cover ever since.
With this book, though, I think that face does a lot to undermine the symbol.
earthside
(6,960 posts)The black and white, the simplicity -- one of the most evocative book covers ever.
If you have seen and read the book, you never forget it.
Shirer was there and as a reporter it is a brilliantly written book.
I wonder how many young people (under 40 years old) have ever read or heard of this book?
How political evil can insinuate itself onto a people is something we all ought to be aware of -- maybe especially right now.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)No issue with it. People would probably complain if it just showed the girl and then realized "OMG my kid is reading about NAZZZIIIS!!!!"
kentauros
(29,414 posts)a graphic novel told through the use of "funny animals." Most people would call it a comic book, and yet it won the Pulitzer, among other prestigious awards.
I have no issue with it being on the cover of anything that is at least academically attempting to teach about WWII history.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Yes, the Nazi symbol is a necessary part of remembering.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)I got to talk to Mr. Spiegelman back in the early 90s, in an attempt to interview him on a radio show. He declined, but we still had a good 20-minute phone chat. Very nice and congenial fellow
Perogie
(687 posts)We should be able to look at any symbol no matter if it represents good or evil through a history lens.
You're the one allowing it to disturb you.
underpants
(182,803 posts)Thanks. Not snarky response from me. I just don't want my kid seen near a swastika.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)That you're considering covering it up-- that must be the richest deposit of ironium that I've seen in a while.
underpants
(182,803 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)literature and painting -- and human beings -- who get in their way, who challenge their authority, who offer an intellectually nuanced position for the consideration of a nation or culture.
Why can't a high school student be trusted with information? The Third Reich was abominably immoral, no question. But it occurred within very recent generations. A high school student should be asked to consider the moral cost of mass movements and what it means for an authoritarian government to extinguish the lives of people times 6 or 7 million.
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)My children attended public schools, and had mostly outstanding teachers. I support learning history. Parts of human history are both ugly and disturbing. Hence, my appreciation for the capable teachers they had.
Response to underpants (Original post)
Post removed
underpants
(182,803 posts)I'll keep you in mind if it continues as unbelievably well as it has gone so far.
lindysalsagal
(20,686 posts)But we're not doing them any favors. High school is the time.
Demit
(11,238 posts)And not pictured as a graphic symbol alone? I'm trying to figure out your visceral reaction. Is it because it's on an object that we are taught to treat with respect, automatically, that you feel that it has more subliminal power, in the illustration, than it should?
My feeling is that the girl's face has such trepidation, or worry or fear on it, that her expression balances out and even negates the power of the symbol behind her. The symbol is far in the background at any rate. You see the girl's troubled face first, then you make the association that it is the flag and what it represents that's the source of it. I hope you'll reconsider wanting to hide the symbol. I think the illustrator did a good job with how he/she handled it.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Instead of hiding and running from history use it as a catalyst for discussion and reflection.
RandySF
(58,823 posts)underpants
(182,803 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)If we hide form the monsters, they only get worse.
?w=600&h=576&crop=1
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...that they should be portrayed in, I have no problem with the artwork on the front cover.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)appropriate for this book. As for the copy being beaten up... I've seen what happens to paperback books that get tossed into kid's backpacks. This is nothing unusual, and there's no need to replace the book unless part of it is missing.
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)what the problem is.
The swastika is on the cover art of a book critical about Nazi-ism? Do you want your daughter to never see what a swastika looks like? Are you afraid someone may see her book and think she's a neo-Nazi?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)lesson I took from learning about the Nazis is that they judged people by their looks, they judged the book by the cover.
The actual course of the narrative is that she is taken from her family, culturally assimilated to a great extent but that she retains her true self even in the face of what has been done to her, the reunion with her 'true family' is actually a reunion with just her mother, who has suffered in a concentration camp, her father and brother killed, home and village destroyed, her sister is missing having been 'adopted' like Milada which is Eva's real name. They move in with a distant cousin and Milada recovers her true language and her true self. I would describe that, the post war portion, as the 'third act' of the story and not merely the denouement.
I offer that 'The war ends and of course he reunites with her true family' is not really accurate, sadly reductive and indicates that you have not in fact read the book you are taking to task. You looked at the cover, heard a summary from your child and that's where your soapbox got placed.
hack89
(39,171 posts)the power of the book is in the message it conveys, not a symbol on the cover. Are you concerned that seeing a Nazi symbol will lessen the message of the book?
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Never Forget.
Bettie
(16,109 posts)it in in correct context.
Given what you've said about the class, the kids should be fully aware of what the flag was and what it stood for, what it still stands for.
I'd not worry about it. My kids are smart enough to know that it is an ugly part of history, but part of history nonetheless.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)raccoon
(31,110 posts)problem with the swastika on the cover.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)I don't like cheap Nazi comparisons for everyone whom one dislikes or finds too bossy, but the Nazis were, well, Nazis, and a historical novel about them has to portray them as such, including the swastika. Nor do I think that it makes a difference to the young reader whether it's on the cover or within the book.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Flags? Religious symbols? Dollar signs in the study of economics?
Using a swastika in the study of Nazism seems appropriate just as showing a burning cross is appropriate to a study of racism.
ProfessorGAC
(65,042 posts)I get your point. But, the thing is in deep background and the book is obviously about the young woman.
If the material is age appropriate, then an explanation as to how bad that period was would not be above grade level. And, it would become a teaching moment.
underpants
(182,803 posts)My kid is getting a new copy of the book without the Nazi symbolism.
Content of the covers will be presented to the committee that selects material to be considered as a policy change in the future.
I appreciate your post Prof and the others as well. They do extensively discuss the true historic use of that symbol and the directional orientation aspects of it. My child's book is being switched to a cover without the Nazi element present on it.
Thanks everyone but this is my kid and my issue. I don't regret at all expressing my opinion on it and I am glad that I could make this change.
Throd
(7,208 posts)KatyMan
(4,190 posts)And the 'never forget' torch is being passed to another generation. I wouldn't be reaching for the fainting couch.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I love books, love reading and love free expression. Mrs. 'Droid is a librarian and I make my living under the protection of the First Amendment.
My kids would feel ashamed if their mother censored a book in this way.
Maeve
(42,282 posts)Now, if I were taking a class with, say, "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" with it's stark cover, I'd likely put a red circle with line thru over the swastika just so my opinon would be noted by anyone seeing me with the book, but in the context of the cover as shown in one of the other responses....or the Maus cover...it's acceptable. I think it's better to face the symbol openly than to fig-leaf it.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)If one is to study the history, one must also understand the origins, messages, and nomenclature of totalitarian societies, no matter how offensive the ideology.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)My children read the "Mein Kampf" in German.
I had (have) an original. It was passed out like candy in Germany in my youth -- just prior to me escaping the Shoah by the skin of my teeth.
Knowledge is power. You must understand the world.
This coddling of children, "safe spaces" and stupid sheltering from different points of view is creating a country of weak, stupid, people, who are apparently unaware that there is a lot of evil in this world.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)BlueCollar
(3,859 posts)I would be OK with it in this context. The swastika image is historically appropriate.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)Shouldn't be a big deal.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)There were nazis. They had a flag. It had a swastika on it. How is knowledge of that going to harm your child?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)You've completely ignored the real story, the book itself, to obsess over the cover.
hunter
(38,312 posts)Something like this, perhaps:
http://chocodrama.deviantart.com/art/no-nazi-stencil-132206382
My wife's uncle was killed by the Nazis and is buried at Arlington National Cemetery.
When our kids were in high school we took them to visit his grave. We also visited the Holocaust Museum.
Children whose parents can't afford them these opportunities, or worse, have parents who are various flavors of Nazi themselves, they are entirely dependent upon on good teachers for their education.
A Nazi swastika on the cover of a school textbook is disturbing, but everything about the Nazis is disturbing.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)I think you're over reacting.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)That seems petty and nit-picky to me.
There are battles to be chosen. For me, this isn't one of them by any measure.