Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:07 PM Jan 2016

Fox News is on it's Death Bed

The succession question seems to be taking on new urgency after three sources say Ailes threatened to quit this summer when Murdoch elevated his sons, Lachlan and James, to take over the media empire. After their promotions were announced, Ailes put out his own statement on Fox Business that declared he would continue reporting directly to Rupert. Eventually, an uneasy accord was reached: Rupert gave Ailes a new contract, but Fox issued a follow-up press release clarifying that Ailes would report to Rupert as well as Lachlan and James. Since that stinging public rebuke, executives have noticed Rupert around the Fox News hallways. “He’s marking his territory,” one person briefed on the matter told me. “There’s a little bit of a pissing match with Roger. Rupert is basically saying, ‘I know you built this place, but I own it and I’ll remind you of that by coming here.’”

… Meanwhile, Fox hosts and producers tell me Ailes has been a somewhat diminished force at the network. In 2014, he took an extended leave of absence after a health scare. He still has trouble walking and rarely ventures out of his executive suite. A friend who ran into Ailes in Palm Beach over the holidays remarked that he was using a walker. “He seems detached and removed,” one Fox personality tells me. “He’s not around as much,” says another friend of Ailes. “He doesn’t have as many meetings with talent.”


http://crooksandliars.com/2016/01/roger-ailes-reportedly-diminished-force

It's a safe bet Lachlan and James Murdoch consider Fox News an embarrassment. Once they begin to exert full control I'm confident they will turn Fox News into a straight news organization (i.e. Ted Turner era CNN) and drop the rabid, right wing, angry Hooter's Girls motif.
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox News is on it's Death Bed (Original Post) ZX86 Jan 2016 OP
"Angry Hooter Girls" - BWAHAAAAAA Siwsan Jan 2016 #1
Shares in peroxide hair dye will plunge. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #58
Why is it a "safe bet" Murdoch's sons rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #2
Because they are not a couple of dirty old men ZX86 Jan 2016 #5
There are plenty rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #7
There's no love lost between them and Roger Ailes. ZX86 Jan 2016 #14
Also rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #8
There's a difference between attractive newscasters ZX86 Jan 2016 #13
The two on the ends seem too have forgotten to wear panties. hedda_foil Jan 2016 #23
It's a safer bet melman Jan 2016 #11
They know how to make plenty of money ZX86 Jan 2016 #15
Their contemporaries are other mega wealthy sons/daughters of privilege. Marr Jan 2016 #42
Disagree ZX86 Jan 2016 #46
I hope you are right, I really do Maru Kitteh Jan 2016 #50
I agree, Fox News is a money machine for Rupert's Empire dem in texas Jan 2016 #26
I don't give a good damn who or what changes that Lint Head Jan 2016 #3
While I appreciate and share your disgust. ZX86 Jan 2016 #6
rupert still own several newspapers in Australia and England Jim Beard Jan 2016 #17
I'm totally referring to they'renews arm. Star Wars Lint Head Jan 2016 #28
They only own distribution rights on home video for the original films. Blue_Adept Jan 2016 #31
Which is a license to print money. ZX86 Jan 2016 #34
MSNBC and CNN would go bankrupt before Fox News yeoman6987 Jan 2016 #27
Just like clockwork. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #33
I'm sure the sons are pricks just like their old man. Look at the son in England. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #4
While there is no shortage of pricks ZX86 Jan 2016 #9
Agreed. They're probably a couple of pricks too. Greybnk48 Jan 2016 #10
I disagee. ZX86 Jan 2016 #20
Just keep Ailes alive long enough to lose another Presidential elections malaise Jan 2016 #12
Maybe its just me but I think Ailes connection to Bush's "Turd Blossom" Jim Beard Jan 2016 #18
Would explain why JebusenoughfuggingBushes is going nowhere n/t malaise Jan 2016 #21
Of COURSE The Baron Harkonnen Was Pissed Off. Management of Arrakis Was Supposed To Go TrollBuster9090 Jan 2016 #16
This is the exact plot of the show Empire! Initech Jan 2016 #19
like the death of the gop.....way premature dembotoz Jan 2016 #22
Two years ago ZX86 Jan 2016 #35
i live in fox and tea party land.....no signs of distress in either of them around here dembotoz Jan 2016 #44
Even in Fox and Tea Party Land ZX86 Jan 2016 #49
Just like they will the NY Post? N/t CommonSenseDemocrat Jan 2016 #24
I don't think they care if it's an embarrassment; they care if it's turning a profit. brooklynite Jan 2016 #25
It's not an either/or proposition. ZX86 Jan 2016 #37
"The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated." briv1016 Jan 2016 #29
Their revenue stream isn't limited to Fox News ZX86 Jan 2016 #38
There are and have been many RW conservative "Hollywood" actors and moguls. Liberal Hollywood Fla Dem Jan 2016 #43
Clearly 3/4 of that list are blithering idiots ZX86 Jan 2016 #45
Teri Garr?! KamaAina Jan 2016 #53
i don't buy this crap that the Sons are different . CNN sucks even more than Fox JI7 Jan 2016 #30
The sons are different. ZX86 Jan 2016 #40
i haven't seen any evidence of it yet JI7 Jan 2016 #47
They hate Roger Ailes. ZX86 Jan 2016 #48
But unlike those people melman Jan 2016 #59
Apples and oranges ZX86 Jan 2016 #60
There you go melman Jan 2016 #62
In the real world ZX86 Jan 2016 #63
A change will be welcomed madokie Jan 2016 #32
Just like all of those articles predicting the demise of the Republican Party n2doc Jan 2016 #36
Just you wait. ZX86 Jan 2016 #39
But your post was about FNC cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #56
That's the first thing I always think when I see "x is toast" posts. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #55
without Ailes, Fox is no longer "GOP TV" librechik Jan 2016 #41
Why would you mess with a good thing, you tell people what they want to hear doc03 Jan 2016 #51
If you're watching at the gym ZX86 Jan 2016 #52
You have a point you forgot the Viagra and reverse mortgage ads. doc03 Jan 2016 #61
Rupert marking his territory? EWWWWWWWWWWWW 47of74 Jan 2016 #54
"He doesn't have as many meetings with talent." Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #57

Siwsan

(26,260 posts)
1. "Angry Hooter Girls" - BWAHAAAAAA
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:11 PM
Jan 2016

I have that channel blocked, and have never watched any of its shows, but 'Angry Hooter Girls' is probably one of the best descriptives I've ever read.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
2. Why is it a "safe bet" Murdoch's sons
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:14 PM
Jan 2016

are going to change anything? Is there any evidence of their purported "embarrassment?" Why wouldn't they milk the same profitable grift until the last old racist angry white guy kicks the bucket?

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
5. Because they are not a couple of dirty old men
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:35 PM
Jan 2016

born at the beginning of the last century. I'm sure they do not cherish the thought of standing in between Jennifer Lawrence and JJ Abrams at some fancy Hollywood cocktail party trying to explain away why their network is denying climate change, why they are being sued by Paris for lying about "no go zones", and why their broadcasts resemble more of an up skirt peep show in the tender loin district rather than a world class news network.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
7. There are plenty
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:41 PM
Jan 2016

of dirty young men.

I've seen no evidence whatsoever Murdoch's sons are more honorable than the old man.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
14. There's no love lost between them and Roger Ailes.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:02 PM
Jan 2016

They hate each other. In addition they are competent business executives that can recognize the Fox News audience is literally dying off. I've got milk in my refrigerator that will last longer than that business model.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
8. Also
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jan 2016

please show me a "world class news network" that doesn't use female anchors as sex objects.

If you say BBC or RT I'll laugh hard.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
13. There's a difference between attractive newscasters
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:54 PM
Jan 2016

the blatant up skirt peep shows that is the Fox News Network.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
15. They know how to make plenty of money
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:12 PM
Jan 2016

with out embarrassing themselves in front of their peer group. They are not some recluse holed up in some hotel suite like Howard Hughes or some dottering old man born at the beginning of the last century who needs some silicone laden platinum blonde at their side to feel like a real man.

Their contemporaries are modern, liberal, Hollywood movie executives. That's the environment they operate in and will behave accordingly.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
42. Their contemporaries are other mega wealthy sons/daughters of privilege.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016

The executive class are basically their valets. I doubt they give two shits about what JJ Abrams thinks. He's another working plebe from their perspective.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
46. Disagree
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jan 2016

Lachlan and James Murdoch are actual hands on, working executives in their industry. Not trust fund kids who just show up at stock holders meetings and count their money. They have to network with other power brokers in their industry and make deals.

I'm quite confident they don't cherish the thought of Jay Z approaching them at some gala Hollywood event and asking why their employee Bill O'Reilly is calling his wife a slut on national TV.

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
26. I agree, Fox News is a money machine for Rupert's Empire
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:59 AM
Jan 2016

They have found a niche where they can sell lots of advertising, why would they change it? Money rules all with them.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
3. I don't give a good damn who or what changes that
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:31 PM
Jan 2016

piece of shit company. I pray they go bankrupt. Too much blood is on their hands.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
6. While I appreciate and share your disgust.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:40 PM
Jan 2016

Fox News is just a fraction of the Fox empire which includes 20th Century Fox Films. They still own the first Star Wars movie. They are not going bankrupt anytime soon.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
28. I'm totally referring to they'renews arm. Star Wars
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:22 AM
Jan 2016

is not reporting absolute lies on a daily basis.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
31. They only own distribution rights on home video for the original films.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:38 AM
Jan 2016

Not the actual content or anything else associated with it.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
9. While there is no shortage of pricks
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:49 PM
Jan 2016

at the executive level of the corporate media establishment Lachlan and James Murdoch are not right wing ideologues. They know how to make money hand over fist without embarrassing themselves in front of their peer group.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
20. I disagee.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jan 2016

This situation is more like Ronald Reagan and offspring Ron Reagan and Patti Davis and less like Fred Koch and his sons Charles and David.

malaise

(268,967 posts)
12. Just keep Ailes alive long enough to lose another Presidential elections
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jan 2016

Clearly he has serious health issues

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
16. Of COURSE The Baron Harkonnen Was Pissed Off. Management of Arrakis Was Supposed To Go
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jan 2016

Management of Arrakis was supposed to go to HIS nephews! Not the Emperor's sons.



Initech

(100,068 posts)
19. This is the exact plot of the show Empire!
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 11:28 PM
Jan 2016

Murdoch: I'm building an empire for my sons to run!
Ailes: But where's my empire? Why don't I get a piece of the empire?

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
35. Two years ago
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 10:59 AM
Jan 2016

I would have said the same thing about the ban on gay marriage, pot legalization, and a socialist running for president.

dembotoz

(16,802 posts)
44. i live in fox and tea party land.....no signs of distress in either of them around here
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jan 2016

infact stronger than ever

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
49. Even in Fox and Tea Party Land
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jan 2016

Gays can marry. They can also get gay wedding cake, gay wedding flowers, gay Obamacare, you name it. Fox and Tea Party Land isn't what it used to be.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
37. It's not an either/or proposition.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jan 2016

They don't need to embarrass themselves to make money and that audience is literally dying off regardless. I don't know anybody under 50 who watches Fox News. Having the largest ratings doesn't mean much if the majority of your audience is living in nursing homes and the only advertising you can sell is Car Canes, big button phones, and reverse mortgages.

briv1016

(1,570 posts)
29. "The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated."
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:41 AM
Jan 2016

As long as they keep spewing hate the republicans will continue to watch and keep them profitable. At the end of the day they are in business of making money.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
38. Their revenue stream isn't limited to Fox News
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

Trust me. Fox News could go belly up tomorrow and they'll still be able to wipe their asses with hundred dollar bills for the rest of their lives. But there are several reasons why Fox News will change.

1. Lachlan and James Murdoch are not right wing ideologues. You don't see them at Value Voter summits, promoting looney right wing causes and candidates, or making fevered tweets about race relations, unions, immigration, etc.

2. They hate Roger Ailes. I'm pretty sure it's not because he isn't right wing enough.

3. Fox News business model is on the fast track to obsolescence. Just because they are #1 in ratings doesn't mean they aren't doomed. VHS was the #1 video format in 1995. Two years later in was over.

4. They have other business concerns. They are essentially movie moguls who operate in liberal Hollywood and want to fit in with their peers. Fox News right wing nut baggery will be a distraction to their business and social interests.

Fla Dem

(23,656 posts)
43. There are and have been many RW conservative "Hollywood" actors and moguls. Liberal Hollywood
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

is a myth Rethugs perpetuate to denigrate any big star supporting a Democratic candidate.

ACTORS
Fred Astaire
Adam Baldwin
Stephen Baldwin
James Caan
Dean Cain
Michael Caine
Kirk Cameron
Fred Dalton Thompson
Robert Davi
Shannen Doherty
Robert Downey, Jr.
Clint Eastwood
Michael J. Fox
Andy Garcia
Teri Garr[14]
Mel Gibson
Kelsey Grammer
Melissa Joan Hart
Dennis Hopper
Patricia Heaton
Charlton Heston
Victoria Jackson
Christopher Lee
Rob Lowe
Susan Lucci
John Malkovich
Eva Mendez
Craig T. Nelson
Leslie Nielsen
Chuck Norris
Gary Oldman
Ronald Reagan
John Rhys-Davies
Joan Rivers
Kurt Russell
Adam Sandler
Dwight Schultz
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Jerry Seinfeld
Tom Selleck
Sherri Shephard
Gary Sinise
Kevin Sorbo
James Stewart
Sylvester Stallone
Vince Vaughn
Jon Voight
Jimmie Walker
Marion John Wayne
Bruce Willis
James Woods

More>>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:Hollywood_conservatives

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
45. Clearly 3/4 of that list are blithering idiots
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jan 2016

with the remaining being greedy, self centered, narcissistic, opportunists. Traits and behaviors Hollywood is famous for. Their conservatism is a bug, not a feature.

Note: The number of A list talent on that list is pretty thin. Many on that list is the WORST Hollywood has to offer. Talent-less hacks doesn't begin to describe them.

JI7

(89,248 posts)
30. i don't buy this crap that the Sons are different . CNN sucks even more than Fox
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:48 AM
Jan 2016

at least with Fox people know they are right wing . but CNN is seen as the balanced unbiased network by too many .

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
40. The sons are different.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jan 2016

Just like Ron Reagan Jr. is different than Ronald Reagan and Angela Jolie is different than Jon Voight.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
48. They hate Roger Ailes.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016
The Murdoch brothers (CEO James and executive chairman Lachlan) stepped into new leadership positions at 21st Century Fox in July, as their 84-year-old father, Rupert, took a step back. The move prompted speculation about Ailes’s future at Fox News and the network’s direction. While Ailes and Rupert Murdoch are famously close, Murdoch’s progeny reportedly are not big fans of Fox News.

The New York Times reported in 2010 that Lachlan left his father’s company in part because “he thought Mr. Ailes was intruding on his corporate turf,” while James is “sympathetic to Democratic causes” and, along with his sister, Elisabeth, “frequently voiced concerns to their father during [the 2008] presidential campaign about Fox News’s coverage of [then-Sen. Barack] Obama.”


www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/01/roger-ailes-and-rupert-murdochs-sons-arent-exactly-best-friends-yet/

There's plenty of evidence if you look.
 

melman

(7,681 posts)
59. But unlike those people
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jan 2016

neither of the Murdochs has ever publicly said anything that distances themselves from their father's views.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
60. Apples and oranges
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:34 PM
Jan 2016

Lachlan and James Murdoch are working in a corporate environment where their father is still the boss. Those others are not.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
62. There you go
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jan 2016

The fact that they both make a lot of money working for NewsCorp ought to show you how committed they are to these supposed different ideas.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
63. In the real world
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:37 AM
Jan 2016

People make compromises all the time. What would you if you were heir to a billion dollar media empire? Blow it all off, quit your job and disown your family to teach yoga in the park because you can't wait to inherit it all in a few years? You need to make all the changes you want right fucking now?

I don't know about you but I differ with my employers on lots of issues. I don't quit my job to prove how much I'm committed to those ideas. I gotta pay the rent.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
32. A change will be welcomed
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:53 AM
Jan 2016

But I doubt that I can ever forget what they've done to our country since the weasel from NY, during the wee hours of the night, slipped a passage in a bill that was being voted on in a few hours the right for Murdock and fox noise to become a 'news' organization.

It's right up there with the overhaul of the Telecommunication act as it was for years during Bills term.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
36. Just like all of those articles predicting the demise of the Republican Party
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jan 2016

I'll believe it when I see it.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
39. Just you wait.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jan 2016

The Republican National Convention will be a cluster fuck of epic proportions. I predict human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
55. That's the first thing I always think when I see "x is toast" posts.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:28 PM
Jan 2016

We have an expression about the weather where I live... "don't believe what you hear about the weather until you see it on the ground."

I'll believe FNC is dead when I see the cable/satellite companies lowering its casket into the ground i.e. removing it from their basic packages.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
41. without Ailes, Fox is no longer "GOP TV"
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jan 2016

They'll turn it into another USAToday.

Damage has been done, though. The brainwashing Fox gave this country will stick around for decades. We'll never be the same, especially since it culminated in Citizens United. Mission accomplished. Fox runners can skitter back under the floorboards to do their work. Much cheaper, BTW.

doc03

(35,328 posts)
51. Why would you mess with a good thing, you tell people what they want to hear
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:03 PM
Jan 2016

you get ratings and that equals money. Yesterday I was at the gym and was forced to see Fox, with all the news over the prisoner
release and nuclear compliance by Iran they are running script on the bottom of the screen. Meanwhile on main screen they have 4 Republican talking heads telling everyone to be afraid the stock market and the world economy is crashing and it's Obama's fault.

ZX86

(1,428 posts)
52. If you're watching at the gym
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jan 2016

Chances are you're not in the market for a Car Cane, medic alert button, or a walk in bath tub. Ratings do not automatically turn into advertising revenue dollars. Their audience is literally dying.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fox News is on it's Death...