Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pat Buchanan just said that Russia Today "is in many ways a good channel" (Original Post) Renew Deal Jan 2016 OP
RT is propaganda and I refuse to watch it. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #1
so you think Thom Hartman pushes propaganda? kimbutgar Jan 2016 #4
I don't watch tom Hartman and I always like Ed but my point still stands. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #9
I trust myself to be able to tell the difference between legitimate news and propaganda. Live and Learn Jan 2016 #7
I catch Thom Hartman and The Keiser Report on there. I ignore most everything brewens Jan 2016 #2
How can you trust that they aren't affected by the networks agenda? Renew Deal Jan 2016 #3
You obviously never listen to Thom and he is not a fox liberal kimbutgar Jan 2016 #5
I thought I read Hartman's contract gives him complete control. I'm sure Putin brewens Jan 2016 #6
Hartmann is not working for RT. To open let me say I think he is wrong to have the associations he Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #14
Oh Ukraine, Hartmann is obviously either influenced by this Putin TV paycheck uhnope Jan 2016 #16
What? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2016 #10
One propagandist knows a slick product when he sees it!! MADem Jan 2016 #8
Haha! I know. Why do you think he's on The Mclaughlin Group? elias49 Jan 2016 #12
Media produced by an authoritarian regime PeoViejo Jan 2016 #11
That's another interesting aspect Renew Deal Jan 2016 #13
as we push for progressive purity we (imho) throw lots of babies out with the bath water dembotoz Jan 2016 #15
no coincidence that these right wing racists all like Putin TV uhnope Jan 2016 #17

kimbutgar

(21,148 posts)
4. so you think Thom Hartman pushes propaganda?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:57 PM
Jan 2016

And Ed Schultz is also a propagandist because Thom is on RT and Ed is starting a new show later this month.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
7. I trust myself to be able to tell the difference between legitimate news and propaganda.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

I can even watch the Faux News channel with no ill effects (beside a small rise in blood pressure). The choices of good news channels is getting slimmer and slimmer.

i can also admit that RT does have some good programs on.

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
3. How can you trust that they aren't affected by the networks agenda?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

That's my problem with Hartmann and the rest on there. It's like watching "liberals" on Fox.

kimbutgar

(21,148 posts)
5. You obviously never listen to Thom and he is not a fox liberal
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jan 2016

On his show he has right, center and left panelists and the discussions are insightful and get heated. It is Nothing like the fake liberals on fox.

brewens

(13,586 posts)
6. I thought I read Hartman's contract gives him complete control. I'm sure Putin
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

is more than happy to see their attacks on the western elite Thom and Max can be giving it to us straight, even though they are on RT. Now Ed's going to be on there too.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
14. Hartmann is not working for RT. To open let me say I think he is wrong to have the associations he
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jan 2016

does with them, but he and his show are not under any paradigm where RT would 'give him control'. It's a deal favorable to Thom's bottom line for the use of the facilities which includes their right to broadcast his show, which is not an exclusive right. The show is not an RT production an it is entirely owned by Hartman and his production company, meaning him and his family. Any influence they had on content would be because Thom allowed it, the only thing they could do to control what he puts on air would be to pull that show.

That said, I was a huge Thom fan and I do not care for any legitimization of non Union TV facilities nor for media owned by anti gay entities, private or government. I would never do that myself. I would not be on any outlet to make profit if that outlet was owned by people who oppressed Hartman's faith group or people of his sexuality or ethnicity. I wish he had the same standards I do but he does not. I have no reason to offer him my custom.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
16. Oh Ukraine, Hartmann is obviously either influenced by this Putin TV paycheck
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jan 2016

and that's disgusting

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/3/10/1283668/-Thom-Hartmann-Sticking-with-RT-despite-Resignations-over-Putin-s-Actions-in-Ukraine
Hartmann did not address the crisis in Ukraine on his television program, but during his radio program earlier in the day he discussed the situation with Stephen Cohen, who has written recent pieces in The Nation magazine entitled "Demonizing Putin" and "Distorting Russia." During the interview, Hartmann and Cohen accepted as fact the conspiracy theory thatsnipers on the side of the new anti-Russia government fired on their own side in the main square in Kiev so that the now-ousted president Viktor Yanukovych would be blamed.

Hartmann and Cohen also referred the new anti-Russian Ukrainian government as "extremists." "The extremists came to power sharing, they are sharing power now," Cohen said, to Hartmann's agreement. "Obama unwisely keeps declaring the government in Kiev as legitimate," Cohen added.

The Ukrainian governing coalition involves power-sharing between several parties, one of which, Svoboda, is ultranationalist with fascist roots.

Hartmann suggested that the new anti-Russia government in Ukraine were neo-Nazis. "If you listen to the words of these guys in the cabinet, if you listen to the words of the party, they are openly antisemitic, they are openly nationalistic, they are open aggressive," Hartmann said. "Some may think calling them Nazis is a slur, some of them wouldn't refer to themselves that way, but some of them embrace swastikas."

Hartmann has in the past defended Russia on issues like gay rights, saying that Russia is not as bad as Saudi Arabia in terms of gay rights while pointing out that the United States did to give women the right to vote until 1920.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
10. What?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

The networks would never touch Hartmann. He definitely does his own thing. He debates rightwingers all the time, and his ideas are liberal. MSNBC is like watching "Fox" for liberals. MSNBC lost it's objectivity in the run up to the IIRC the 2010 elections. Rachel used to be a truth seeker. Then they figured out that objectivity leads to criticism, and criticism might cost Dems seats. So MSNBC became Fox.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
12. Haha! I know. Why do you think he's on The Mclaughlin Group?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jan 2016

Damned propaganda! It's everywhere: NYT, WashPost, LATimes, Chicago Tribune...and that's just print media!
You are truly poutraged! Don't blame you...it's a bitch out there.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
11. Media produced by an authoritarian regime
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jan 2016

seems like something a right-wing reactionary would like, seeing that there are very few bleeding-heart platitudes to fuck with his head.

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
13. That's another interesting aspect
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jan 2016

For some reason these old cold warriors have embraced Russia over the last couple years. I think it's because they see Putin as an opponent to Obama. And when it comes to choosing Obama or Putin, they chose Putin. It's pathetic how much they have devolved.

dembotoz

(16,804 posts)
15. as we push for progressive purity we (imho) throw lots of babies out with the bath water
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jan 2016

if we accept as true the possibility that main stream media leaves ...... holes in there coverage
tried to be civil.....

alternative media fills a void

i used to listen to shortwave a fair amount and was always amazed that there was stuff going on that we had nary a clue about...
something big happens in africa or south america and we are all shocked and surprised.
if we had been paying attention....well that is quite the request isn't it.

understand they may have an ax to grind but so does fox

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pat Buchanan just said th...