Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:54 AM Jan 2016

Imagine Bloomberg steps in and the election goes to the House. Whom do they select?

It's a weird dynamic, the more I look at it


2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
JEB!
0 (0%)
Cruz
0 (0%)
Rubio
0 (0%)
Kasich
0 (0%)
Ryan
0 (0%)
Bloomberg
1 (50%)
Trump
0 (0%)
Sanders
0 (0%)
O'Malley (hey, a guy can dream)
0 (0%)
Other
1 (50%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Imagine Bloomberg steps in and the election goes to the House. Whom do they select? (Original Post) Recursion Jan 2016 OP
It's only happened twice in our nation's history. roamer65 Jan 2016 #1
1876 kind of did, though not technically Recursion Jan 2016 #2
Trump commands no party loyalty and Hillary is reviled, so my KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #3
No chance of Bloomberg winning the House vote Lurks Often Jan 2016 #10
Louis Gomhert. NT arely staircase Jan 2016 #4
It would be a Republican since they control the House of Representatives davidpdx Jan 2016 #5
Except the Republican establishment despises Trump Recursion Jan 2016 #6
I'm still betting on Trump impolding davidpdx Jan 2016 #8
Bloomberg won't win any states Des Moines De Mon Jan 2016 #7
He only has to win one or two, which I think he could (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #9

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
1. It's only happened twice in our nation's history.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jan 2016

1800 and 1824.

In 1824, the House did not select Andrew Jackson, who had the most in electoral and popular votes. It selected John Quincy Adams, who ran second in both counts.

It will be a decision entirely based on politics.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. 1876 kind of did, though not technically
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:03 AM
Jan 2016

But, yeah: I'm asking what the political outcome might be (it will be the currently sitting caucus that would vote).

Actually I'm not sure of that parenthesis... let me look it up.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
10. No chance of Bloomberg winning the House vote
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jan 2016

Too far out for a clear picture, but in no order: Rubio, Cruz or maybe Kasich. There will be a lot of favors swapped and called in if it comes to that, although I don't expect it to happen.

I think Bloomberg will take more votes from the Democratic side then the Republican side in a general election, IF he runs.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. It would be a Republican since they control the House of Representatives
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jan 2016

So I would go with whomever the Republican nominee is. The Senate would choose the VP, who knows if they'd go with the person the nominee picked or would choose someone different.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. Except the Republican establishment despises Trump
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:40 AM
Jan 2016

And I don't know that Bloomberg would step in if the GOP nominated anybody other than Trump (or Cruz, whom the establishment also despises).

I think somebody like Ryan or Kasich would be much more likely in that case (if only to get rid of Ryan).

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
8. I'm still betting on Trump impolding
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jan 2016

The first four primaries are going to tell us a lot about whether he is really the front runner or an empty sack of shit.

 
7. Bloomberg won't win any states
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:44 AM
Jan 2016

But he'll get enough votes in the critical ones to deliver the presidency to the Ratpublican.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Imagine Bloomberg steps i...