https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_B%C3%A4ckman, for example.
Their source, their neutral main character, leans a bit to one side. Of course, utter partiality is Sputnik's "neutrality." The root of that word is, after all, "neuter." Backman prefers neutering in the face of Putin's utter virility and takes every opportunity to blow Putin's horn.
The poll cited is a bit off. And the "latest poll" is a year old. 27 percent of Finns favored NATO membership, 57 opposed--hardly a stunning number. But still, the OP's text all but require us to think that 73% were opposed.
"I don't like that" =/= "it is not the case that I like that".
There's a fairly large academic discussion over verbs that have a strict two-way meaning where negating the verb = negating the verb's denotation. So "I don't like that" = "I dislike that." They're idiosyncratic, on the surface, but show decided patterns that surpass mere idiosyncrasy.
"I don't like to eat meat but I'm okay with eating it." That sounds a bit strange, more for some than for others.
This is different from "I don't love Kate" which does not mean "I hate Kate". We have no verb "dislove".
"I don't love Kate, but okay with dating her" is perfectly fine pretty okay sounding for everybody, at least on semantic grounds.
On this score Sputnik can't claim plausible stupidity, however obvious it may be in other situations.
Then again, I guess the idiom chunk is "to blow his own horn," and "to blow Putin's horn" might be taken to have some other meaning, esp. in the case of Backman. Gee, who could've known?
= new reply since forum marked as read
