Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:19 PM Feb 2016

Not the Onion:US Study proposes 'nicking' genitals instead of Female Genital Mutilation

FGM IN THE U.S.
A controversial new study published in the Journal of Medical Ethics says “nicking” the genitals of young girls is an acceptable compromise for the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) in the West.

Arguing that criminalizing FGM in Western countries such as the U.S. and U.K. has pushed the practice underground, the authors suggest a “compromise solution” that would legally permit a minimal form of genital mutilation “in recognition of its cultural and religious obligations.” Despite being perceived as a practice linked to Islam, FGM is a cultural practice that has no basis in religion. No religious texts prescribe FGM, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), while Human Rights Watch says the practice is “erroneously linked” to religion and “is not particular to any religious faith.”

In the study, published on Monday, U.S.-based authors Dr. Kavita Shah Arora, director of quality, obstetrics and gynecology at the MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland and Dr. Allan Jacobs, professor of reproductive medicine at Stony Brook University, write that “in order to better protect female children from the serious and long-term harms of some types of non-therapeutic [FGM], we must adopt a more nuanced position that acknowledges a wide spectrum of procedures that alter female genitalia.”

more
http://www.newsweek.com/fgm-compromise-nick-western-countries-429250

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not the Onion:US Study proposes 'nicking' genitals instead of Female Genital Mutilation (Original Post) n2doc Feb 2016 OP
I have a better idea Kalidurga Feb 2016 #1
How about no? Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #2
Moderate doctors? Respectful of cultural differences? katsy Feb 2016 #3
What the fresh hell is this? So it is not even a requirement? So it boils down to parents Rex Feb 2016 #4
What the blueberry fuck? hifiguy Feb 2016 #5
No. PatrickforO Feb 2016 #6
Oh look, it's another wimpy acquiese to another cultural practice against females. Quantess Feb 2016 #7
It's moral cowardice. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #14
Fucking sick cultures. Oh yeah about your Quantess Feb 2016 #18
Actually I was referring to the authors of the study. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #20
"Nuanced position" - WTF?!? That should also be ILLEGAL! CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #8
how about we not respect misogyny in ANY way Skittles Feb 2016 #9
Disgusting...and why do they think that the people joeybee12 Feb 2016 #10
Sickening noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #11
Cowards Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #12
How about "NO nick is a good nick"? nt LiberalElite Feb 2016 #13
Well, the article says there's no religion involved, so there doesn't seem to be... Shandris Feb 2016 #15
Total bullshit angrychair Feb 2016 #16
It's hard to believe a doctor would make this recommendation. A Little Weird Feb 2016 #17
its important that we respect "cultural values" amirite amirite? Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #19
Compromise genital mutilation? DirkGently Feb 2016 #21
Fuck this bullshit. Brickbat Feb 2016 #22
unbelievable and disgusting rollin74 Feb 2016 #23
The "not Islam" part is especially bs Nevernose Feb 2016 #24
I'm not sure I follow you there jberryhill Feb 2016 #30
The credentials of these two give me cause for concern. lpbk2713 Feb 2016 #25
They are not property SHRED Feb 2016 #26
It's a form of control of women (they won't cheat on their men if they can't bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #27
So, what? Cut off the clitoris? Leave the labia? TexasMommaWithAHat Feb 2016 #28
They don't get it. The whole purpose of FGM is to render sex so unpleasant that a woman tblue37 Feb 2016 #29

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. I have a better idea
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:21 PM
Feb 2016

Nick the genitals of the adults that want to do this to their child first, then see how hot they are to do this. Yeah I realize some of the moms might already have done this, in that case give them some educational material like a film of their husbands being nicked.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
2. How about no?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:24 PM
Feb 2016

How about your hop up on the table Doctors Arora and Jacobs and we'll get the scalpel out and do some exploratory "nicking" on your parts to see what looks good?

katsy

(4,246 posts)
3. Moderate doctors? Respectful of cultural differences?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:26 PM
Feb 2016

Well fuck that shit.

No excuse for the opinion of this study.

Whatever their past contributions of these researchers, their new titles should be "quacks".

Hope they're never taken seriously again.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. What the fresh hell is this? So it is not even a requirement? So it boils down to parents
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016

just wanting to be total assholes? Control freaks are sick people. And they cannot hide behind religion on this one, it is totally stupid shit like anti-vaxxers.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. What the blueberry fuck?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016

Are these people on psychedelics? DOCTORS are proposing this?

And, um, yes it IS linked to a particular religulous delusion.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
6. No.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:35 PM
Feb 2016

Fuck that. You're gonna bow down to ignorant misogynists and say, "oh, it's CULTURAL!" No. No. No. No.

A THOUSAND TIMES NO!

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
7. Oh look, it's another wimpy acquiese to another cultural practice against females.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:36 PM
Feb 2016

I'm fucking sick of the weak folding that nearly all countries do, in regards to womens "rights", when confronted with muslim cultures. What a fucking joke, to even say that some women should even have any rights at all, according to the men in their culture.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
14. It's moral cowardice.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:59 PM
Feb 2016

When those who are not part of a culture and who cannot be held to account by that culture acquiesce to practices they find morally repugnant they are simply being cowards.

I suppose those who gave up their brains, spines, balls and hearts can't be bothered to care about a mere clitoris.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
18. Fucking sick cultures. Oh yeah about your
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:47 PM
Feb 2016

last comment... old village ladies slice those female genitalia off, by the thousands with a rusty blade. It's horrible.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
10. Disgusting...and why do they think that the people
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:40 PM
Feb 2016

who are doing to this young girls are open to "compromise"?????

 

Shandris

(3,447 posts)
15. Well, the article says there's no religion involved, so there doesn't seem to be...
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

...any way to track the...propensity of any particular group supporting this. How unfortunate. Very sad, but I suppose nothing can be done about it. **Big Shrug Emoji**

Since the WHO and the other 'world groups' can't seem to figure out where it comes from, we can't just drive the illegality underground. I mean, we learned how terrible that was with abortion. Only thing to do is find a way to make it legal, natch!

((It truly is sad how it's impossible to even figure out who's likely to do this. I mean, I keep coming up with all the times Obadiah Smith and his neighbor Nehemiah Jones did this to their children, and it's just staggering!. (Do I really need the tag? )))

angrychair

(8,700 posts)
16. Total bullshit
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:27 PM
Feb 2016

"Nicking" something is still cutting something and is still FGM. what a bunch of assholes!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
19. its important that we respect "cultural values" amirite amirite?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:55 PM
Feb 2016

I mean, except the sorts of cultural values that let cartoonists draw "blasphemous" cartoons, or let women decide to wear a sexy bathing suit on the cover of a magazine, those deserve universal condemnation of course.

But we must be respectful of these cultural values here, you know.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
24. The "not Islam" part is especially bs
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:30 PM
Feb 2016

While the author is trying to minimize the link to Muslims, this is definitely related to a branch of Islam; religion and culture are often entwined. This is like saying, "No TRUE Scotsman is a Muslim."

I'm not bashing Muslims, at all, not even close. Most Muslims obviously do not participate FGM or anything else like that, but the people performing the FGM sure as hell believe that they're doing it for Islam.

Perhaps the answer lies within getting other, more mainstream Muslims to do educational outreach, either charitably or at the expense of a government (including ours). Education is the key here.

Normally I'm a cultural relativist, but this is one of those cases where I genuinely believe that Western values (not considering women as property, not mutilating girls' genitals, etc.) are superior. On edit: most non-Western, world Muslim values, as well.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
30. I'm not sure I follow you there
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

It's a tribal practice that pre-dates Islam in certain African areas.

Had Islam never come to those places, they'd still be doing it. But those areas did become overwhelmingly Muslim, and the practice continued. Were it not for that history, then in all probability they would be still doing it, irrespective of whatever the dominant local religion had become.

As you note, it is not a practice that correlates with Islam outside of those places where they have always been doing it - Muslim or not.

lpbk2713

(42,759 posts)
25. The credentials of these two give me cause for concern.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:37 PM
Feb 2016



I don't see how it is possible a "director of quality, obstetrics and gynecology" and a "professor of reproductive medicine" can even consider something like this. I find this incredible.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
27. It's a form of control of women (they won't cheat on their men if they can't
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016

feel anything sexually). Disgusting pigs castrate them...(the guys taught the women to believe this is the right thing to do).

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
28. So, what? Cut off the clitoris? Leave the labia?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:44 PM
Feb 2016

What exactly is a fucking "nick" supposed to be?

Yeah, this pisses me off.

tblue37

(65,403 posts)
29. They don't get it. The whole purpose of FGM is to render sex so unpleasant that a woman
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:44 PM
Feb 2016

will not be tempted to be "unchaste," because such cultures think women are all promiscuous and unable to control their animal nature without sch restraints. A symbolic "nick" won't satisfy the purpose of FGM--and besides, they need to just leave those little girls' genitsls the heck alone!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not the Onion:US Study pr...