Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:25 AM Feb 2016

Toomey, Portman Hurt By Supreme Court Stance

New Public Policy Polling surveys of Pennsylvania and Ohio find that both Pat Toomey and Rob Portman are suffering from very weak approval numbers as they seek reelection to the Senate. Furthermore voters in their states, by wide margins, want the vacancy on the Supreme Court to be filled this year. Their opposition to even considering a replacement for Antonin Scalia has the strong potential to put them in even worse standing with voters than they are already.

Key findings from the survey include:

-Only 29% of voters approve of the job Toomey is doing to 40% who disapprove, and just 30% approve of the job Portman is doing to 39% who disapprove. They’re both very much in the danger zone for reelection based on those low approval numbers. One thing complicating their path to reelection is how bad the overall brand of Senate Republicans is. Mitch McConnell has a 13/56 approval rating in Pennsylvania, and a 14/57 one in Ohio. His extreme unpopularity is going to be a weight on his party’s incumbents running across the country.

-Strong majorities of voters- 58/35 in Ohio and 57/40 in Pennsylvania- think that the vacant seat on the Supreme Court should be filled this year. What’s particularly noteworthy about those numbers- and concerning for Portman and Toomey- is how emphatic the support for approving a replacement is among independent voters. In Ohio they think a new Justice should be named this year 70/24 and in Pennsylvania it’s 60/37. Those independent voters are going to make the difference in these tight Senate races, and they have no tolerance for obstructionism on the vacancy.

-Voters are particularly angry about Senators taking the stance that they’re not going to approve anyone before even knowing who President Obama decides to put forward. By a 76/20 spread in Pennsylvania and a 74/18 one in Ohio, voters think the Senate should wait to see who is nominated to the Court before deciding whether or not to confirm that person. Toomey and Portman are out of line even with their own party base on that one- Republicans in Pennsylvania think 67/27 and in Ohio think 63/32 that the Senate should at least give President Obama’s choice a chance before deciding whether or not to confirm them.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/02/toomey-portman-hurt-by-supreme-court-stance.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Toomey, Portman Hurt By Supreme Court Stance (Original Post) Bradical79 Feb 2016 OP
Buh-bye, Portman. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #1
Low disapproval ratings in February may be nice, but Vogon_Glory Feb 2016 #2
Good riddance, Toomey meow2u3 Feb 2016 #3
Add his name...... MyOwnPeace Feb 2016 #4
Called Sen. Toomey's office to voice my disapproval. blue neen Feb 2016 #5
Great Poll Stallion Feb 2016 #6
The GOP may lose control of the Senate due to this stupidity Gothmog Feb 2016 #7
It's about time the Republicans pay for the years of obstruction. blue neen Feb 2016 #8

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. Buh-bye, Portman.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:28 AM
Feb 2016

Ohio could use a solid 2 blue Senators. Our state level offices are a sea of red, as is our highly gerrymandered set of Reps.

Vogon_Glory

(9,109 posts)
2. Low disapproval ratings in February may be nice, but
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:38 AM
Feb 2016

Low voter approval ratings in February may be nice, but voter anger channeled through the ballot box in October and November is much better.

Unfortunately all too many centrists and progressives have forgotten the use of the ballot box to punish as well as to reward politicians.

meow2u3

(24,759 posts)
3. Good riddance, Toomey
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:44 AM
Feb 2016

Nice knowing ya. Now we're going to replace you with a Democrat who cares more about Pennsylvanians than corporate power brokers.

MyOwnPeace

(16,919 posts)
4. Add his name......
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:56 AM
Feb 2016

to the list as another disgraceful Senator to represent Pennsylvania - fighting for first place on that list with Ricky "Sweater vest" Scumtorum.

blue neen

(12,319 posts)
5. Called Sen. Toomey's office to voice my disapproval.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:16 PM
Feb 2016

He's not working for his constituents---he's working for Mitch McConnell. Bad move on Toomey's part.

Bye, Pat! We never liked you anyhow. You haven't done anything for the people of Pennsylvania.

PPP polling is usually pretty accurate in Pennsylvania.

blue neen

(12,319 posts)
8. It's about time the Republicans pay for the years of obstruction.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:46 PM
Feb 2016

The public is sick of it. It would be great to see them lose control of the Senate!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Toomey, Portman Hurt By S...