Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DanM

(341 posts)
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:58 AM Mar 2016

Brussels shows that Europe needs to step up weapons control!

I am sickened right now on reading the news from Brussels.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/europe/brussels-explosions/

European countries need to wake up and realize it's not enough to simply ban guns! They must get control of these components that are going into bombs.

And they must proactively think ahead to what the terrorists will use after guns and bombs are banned, and get control of whatever those potential weapons will be.

It's insanity, and putting your population at risk, to not go all out in banning everything that could be used to make weapons!

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brussels shows that Europe needs to step up weapons control! (Original Post) DanM Mar 2016 OP
Why not just give everyone bombs instead? Matrosov Mar 2016 #1
Ok, you made me LOL, despite the tragedy of this event. n/t DanM Mar 2016 #3
What are the components to which you refer? Wilms Mar 2016 #2
I'm sorry to say your words strike me as defeatist, but they do. DanM Mar 2016 #4
Must I repeat the question? Wilms Mar 2016 #7
I am reminded of Heinlein.... nil desperandum Mar 2016 #8
Bombs and improvised weapons, and their components. DanM Mar 2016 #11
Are you aware that you haven't answered the question? Wilms Mar 2016 #13
What is it SPECIFICALLY that should be banned that isn't already? Glassunion Mar 2016 #15
Damn that NBA lobby. JonathanRackham Mar 2016 #5
That really misses the point jberryhill Mar 2016 #6
It doesn't miss the point, because yours is a different point (which I also agree with). DanM Mar 2016 #10
What if we mandated everyone wear boxing gloves all the time... TipTok Mar 2016 #12
Are you going to ban nail polish remover, hydrogen peroxide... TipTok Mar 2016 #9
Ultra-strict controls didn't prevent the Brussels bombers from having assault rifles. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #14
Specifically, in your mind, what should be "banned"? Glassunion Mar 2016 #16
Why don't you get yourself a suit pintobean Mar 2016 #17
They could just make it illegal sarisataka Mar 2016 #18
I heard on NPR that they used bombs made from bleach and peroxide. Gonna ban that stuff? cleanhippie Mar 2016 #19
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
2. What are the components to which you refer?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:07 AM
Mar 2016

You can build a bomb using pretty ordinary stuff it would be difficult to ban, like plumbing pipe and nails.

But go right ahead. For every tragedy there are innumerable knee-jerk reactions. Some become law. Some lead to war.

 

DanM

(341 posts)
4. I'm sorry to say your words strike me as defeatist, but they do.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:27 AM
Mar 2016

Look that isn't a personal attack. I'm sure you are a wonderful person, and not generally a "defeatist".

What I'm talking about is we can't feed into the same argument that those opposed use to turn off any talk of getting control on weapons.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
7. Must I repeat the question?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:48 AM
Mar 2016

Can you answer it?

Seems you have the world divided up into two categories. Those in favor, as you see it, and those opposed, as you see it. I'm neither.

So again, what specifically do you propose banning?

nil desperandum

(654 posts)
8. I am reminded of Heinlein....
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:12 AM
Mar 2016
“Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.”


Count me among the curmudgeons...Jefferson stated that he preferred a dangerous freedom to a peaceful servitude. We live in a dangerous world and I agree with your assessment that many, many, things can be made to go boom. I don't need the government interfering there anymore than I need them interfering in the rest of my personal affairs.
 

DanM

(341 posts)
11. Bombs and improvised weapons, and their components.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:37 AM
Mar 2016

Europe is on the right path on where we want to be with weapons control. They just need to do more to go further.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
13. Are you aware that you haven't answered the question?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:48 AM
Mar 2016

You do not walk into a store in Europe to purchase "bombs and improvised weapons". But you could buy components such as plumbing pipe, fertilizer, nails and screws, etc.

What is it SPECIFICALLY that should be banned that isn't already?

Last try...

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
15. What is it SPECIFICALLY that should be banned that isn't already?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:15 AM
Mar 2016

A: Stuff... Lots and lots of stuff.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. That really misses the point
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:44 AM
Mar 2016

Brussels will end the year with a lower violent killing rate than any US city its size.
 

DanM

(341 posts)
10. It doesn't miss the point, because yours is a different point (which I also agree with).
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:24 AM
Mar 2016

Europe is so much further ahead on where we truly need to be with weapon control, they just need to go much further.

Yes, and the US needs to get to where Europe is at on weapons control. But my thread is about this heavily covered news event going on in Europe, so General Discussion policy is to keep this thread to that.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
12. What if we mandated everyone wear boxing gloves all the time...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:40 AM
Mar 2016

... Then they wouldn't have the fine motor skills to assemble a bomb.

Think of all the lives that could be saved!

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
14. Ultra-strict controls didn't prevent the Brussels bombers from having assault rifles.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:00 AM
Mar 2016

And you're proposing banning fertilizer, nail polish remover, plumbing pipe, nails, etc.?

sarisataka

(18,636 posts)
18. They could just make it illegal
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:32 AM
Mar 2016

to kill people

Otherwise after guns, nitrate compounds, flammable liquids ..., the list of potential weapons gets pretty long.



+



=

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Brussels shows that Europ...