Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

corbettkroehler

(1,898 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:58 AM Mar 2016

Purple House District Goes Uncontested By Dems - Why DWS Must Resign

Yet another abject failure by the DNC establishment and the DCCC. VA CD02 may go uncontested with the filing deadline of Thursday. How can the party's leaders be excused from this abject failure?

http://www.dailypress.com/news/politics/dp-nws-2nd-district-20160325-story.html

Virginia Politics: And the 2nd District Democrats are ...?


Suppose they held a primary and nobody came?

For all the sound and fury in the battle for the Republican nomination for the 2nd Congressional District, which now ranges from Williamsburg to Virginia Beach, there's been hardly a whisper from the Democratic side.

But the Democrats are still planning a primary, state party spokeswoman Emily Bolton says.

And candidates have just four more business days, until March 31, to declare for office, submit petitions to be included on the ballot and pay their fees, according to the state Department of Elections.



17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Purple House District Goes Uncontested By Dems - Why DWS Must Resign (Original Post) corbettkroehler Mar 2016 OP
DWS is a disgrace, doing everything in her power to make sure LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #1
Based on the results, it would be hard to argue against your point. Scuba Mar 2016 #8
Debbie is a Republican claiming to be a Democrat. Odin2005 Mar 2016 #2
We have to start including Obama's name in these DWS hate threads. Chakab Mar 2016 #3
You can't force somebody to run Gman Mar 2016 #4
No, you can't force anybody to run. What you can do is recruit competent Chakab Mar 2016 #7
Maybe they have tried. former9thward Mar 2016 #13
I don't believe for a second that they could not find somebody who'd be willing to run for Chakab Mar 2016 #15
The DNC does not finance candidates. former9thward Mar 2016 #16
Not directly, but support from the DNC leads to recognition from players who routinely contribute Chakab Mar 2016 #17
FIRE DWS Donate to Tim Canova FL-23 here Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #5
She proves that incompetence is no barrier to position world wide wally Mar 2016 #6
She's a textbook example of Laurence Peter's observation that Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #12
this is a state party failure not dws....i thnk she is awful but this lies with state party dembotoz Mar 2016 #9
If the state party dropped the ball like this, D-triple-C should have stepped in Recursion Mar 2016 #11
How is that DWS's problem? She's DNC, not DCCC Recursion Mar 2016 #10
It's not a failure, it's the plan awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #14

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
2. Debbie is a Republican claiming to be a Democrat.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:09 AM
Mar 2016

I bet she is being bribed to keep those seats uncontested.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
3. We have to start including Obama's name in these DWS hate threads.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:18 AM
Mar 2016

He has the power to force her out, yet he does and says nothing as the electoral losses continue to mount.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
4. You can't force somebody to run
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:18 AM
Mar 2016

Who the hell in their right mind would seriously want to run for Congress these days? Sounds like a bunch of sane people in the district.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
7. No, you can't force anybody to run. What you can do is recruit competent
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:24 AM
Mar 2016

candidates to bid for seats that are realistically attainable in moderate districts that have elected Democrats in the recent past.

There is no excuse whatsoever for the DNC failing to recruit candidates to run against vulnerable incumbents in a Presidential election cycle when Democrats typically have the best voter turnout and the best chances of winning.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
13. Maybe they have tried.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:08 PM
Mar 2016

You don't know they haven't. Maybe there is no one willing to run in that district.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
15. I don't believe for a second that they could not find somebody who'd be willing to run for
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:31 PM
Mar 2016

a Congressional seat in a moderate district with the proper financial backing.


We're not talking about rural districts in deep red states where a Democratic candidate, even a conservative one, would have no chance whatsoever of winning. We're talking about seats that have been held by Democrats in the recent past.

The inability to see that this is a complete failure on the part of the DNC is either due to obtuseness of naivete.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
16. The DNC does not finance candidates.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:44 PM
Mar 2016

They have to do that largely on their own. If someone can't get proper financial backing its on them not he DNC.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
17. Not directly, but support from the DNC leads to recognition from players who routinely contribute
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:48 PM
Mar 2016

to viable candidates. There are donor networks that only people with establishment approval have access to.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
12. She's a textbook example of Laurence Peter's observation that
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:40 AM
Mar 2016

"In time, every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out its duties"

dembotoz

(16,802 posts)
9. this is a state party failure not dws....i thnk she is awful but this lies with state party
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:01 AM
Mar 2016

in my state, unless your race is "targeted" you will not get party support.

seen it time and again...find someone to run and the state party turns him/her into the maytag repariman

who decides which race is targeted? sorry ...above my pay grade

part of a self fulfilling prophesy....reason red areas stay red cause they state party is not interested.
ask the state party why they are not interested? cause the area is red.....

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. If the state party dropped the ball like this, D-triple-C should have stepped in
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:09 AM
Mar 2016

But, still, that's Luján, not Wasserman-Schultz.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
14. It's not a failure, it's the plan
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:33 PM
Mar 2016

The goal is maintain a tenuous balance. Our party may or may not take back either house, but even if we did it wouldn't be by a large enough majority to do anything. Same thing when the republicans are in charge. We will have the congress Wall Street wants. All the rest is Kabuki theater

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Purple House District Goe...