General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCruz’s former roommate talks about Cruz's self-pleasuring — click only if you’ve already had lunch.
Craig Mazin, a Los Angeles screenwriter and film maker, has made headlines in recent months for commenting on his unhappy time spent as the Texas senators college room mate.
According to Mother Jones, Cruzs office argued in 2007 that there is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate ones genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.
Mazin quickly responded to Cruzs reported comments on Wednesday:
Ted Cruz thinks people don't have a right to "stimulate their genitals." I was his college roommate. This would be a new belief of his.
AND
Ted Cruz did not have a dildo stashed under his pillow. Ted Cruz slept on top of his pillow.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/ted-cruzs-former-roommate-just-revealed-his-self-pleasuring-technique-only-click-if-youve-already-had-lunch/
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Priceless!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That guy is pretty fucking funny.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)I am sure it is obvious but???
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)I was trying to figure out what he was doing with the pillow
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Jeez, i thought mine was bad.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)an article on this, "The Time Ted Cruz Defended a Ban on Dildos." Actually, we could defeat Cruz based solely on his record as a Texas Solicitor General. The man's a religious extremist creep.
"... The brief insisted that Texas, in order to protect "public morals," had "police-power interests" in "discouraging prurient interests in sexual gratification, combating the commercial sale of sex, and protecting minors." There was a "government" interest, it maintained, in "discouraging
autonomous sex." The brief compared the use of sex toys to "hiring a willing prostitute or engaging in consensual bigamy," and it equated advertising these products with the commercial promotion of prostitution. In perhaps the most noticeable line of the brief, Cruz's office declared, "There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship." That is, the pursuit of such happiness had no constitutional standing. And the brief argued there was no "right to promote dildos, vibrators, and other obscene devices." The plaintiffs, it noted, were "free to engage in unfettered noncommercial speech touting the uses of obscene devices," but not speech designed to generate the sale of these items.
The brief by Cruz's office compared the use of sex toys to "hiring a willing prostitute or engaging in consensual bigamy," and it equated advertising these products with the commercial promotion of prostitution.
In a 2-1 decision issued in February 2008, the court of appeals told Cruz's office to take a hike. The court, citing Lawrence, pointed to the "right to be free from governmental intrusion regarding 'the most private human contact, sexual behavior.'" ....
Summing up, the judges declared, "The case is not about public sex. It is not about controlling commerce in sex. It is about controlling what people do in the privacy of their own homes because the State is morally opposed to a certain type of consensual private intimate conduct. This is an insufficient justification for the statute after Lawrence...Whatever one might think or believe about the use of these devices, government interference with their personal and private use violates the Constitution."
Btw, Cruz tried to appeal this decision but was turned down.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/04/ted-cruz-dildo-ban-sex-devices-texas
Akamai
(1,779 posts)and that someone, somewhere, is having a good time.
Kruz is certainly pathetic.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)They're totally committed to putting sex itself back in the closet. Pathetic and creepy, and dangerous, obsession.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)always good for a chuckle or three.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I don't think there is a Commandment from God saying thou shalt not pleasure oneself with a sex toy.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)So maybe the two of them can do a joint speaking tour.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)That and how womens are evil sinners who force men to rape them, and minorities' sin of coveting that 'stuff' that righteously belong to white men, plus the right to destroy the planet at will.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,007 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That thing is Ramsay Bolton's pork sausage.
unapatriciated
(5,390 posts)King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)Anyway, it was more palatable and entertaining than whatever
he actually said, I would assume. BTW, I could use some more goose diarrhea !
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's just too close to real.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)I need a blogel for the glotch.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Recently Bill Maher said that Ted Cruz has the appeal of Jared Fogle, but without the inspiring weight loss story.
colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)He is not stupid. I am sure he knew his argument was pure bullshit and
violated right to privacy laws.
Ted Cruz believes in "whatever it takes to get right-wing, Texas, evangelicals
to like me on Facebook and vote for me." Amen.
Old Union Guy
(738 posts)It's really about states rights.
Really.
Beartracks
(12,816 posts)What does that even mean?
====================
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)... I think it means, "do what you want to do".
Bucky
(54,027 posts)There's your due-process. In fact, Texas is practically slapping you in the face with all our due process.
See? You're covered in laws now.
swimboy
(7,284 posts)"They can take that away from me when they pry it from my cold, dead, aloe-scented hands."
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)Or ever, really.