Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 02:42 PM Apr 2016

#DemocracySpring: This Is What Irony Looks Like

http://sputniknews.com/cartoons/20160413/1037954959/democracy-spring-irony.html

Hundreds of protesters calling for election reform have been arrested, but are the true criminals going free?




Demonstrators with #DemocracySpring are protesting in Washington DC all week, seeking robust reforms in the US election process.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#DemocracySpring: This Is What Irony Looks Like (Original Post) KamaAina Apr 2016 OP
What were the charges? giftedgirl77 Apr 2016 #1
Perhaps they didn't get a permit 2naSalit Apr 2016 #2
That's what I read... giftedgirl77 Apr 2016 #3
It is an impotant point 2naSalit Apr 2016 #4
Or once again they failed to follow the most basic requirements necessary to gather. giftedgirl77 Apr 2016 #6
2naSalit is correct.. polmaven Apr 2016 #8
I was perusing the First Amendment onethatcares Apr 2016 #10
This^^^ AllyCat Apr 2016 #24
I think that the idea was to get arrested so as to bring attention to their cause. SalviaBlue Apr 2016 #16
I guess some here would have been against the Civil Rights movement as well. Rex Apr 2016 #20
Oh, now. Inappropriate. I am for competence. The OP posted Hortensis Apr 2016 #35
Why are you bringing up Bernie? Stuck record? Rex Apr 2016 #36
They are protesting the Corruption in politics. Duval Apr 2016 #11
I knew what they were protesting 2naSalit Apr 2016 #18
they were hfojvt Apr 2016 #28
It is called Civil Disobedience, bvar22 Apr 2016 #29
I am not arguing that it isn't. 2naSalit Apr 2016 #30
Permits are apparently almost never denied. Hortensis Apr 2016 #7
One should not need a permit to exercise Constitutional rights AllyCat Apr 2016 #25
Oh, come on! Tell yourself that when you've Hortensis Apr 2016 #32
I do. As a progressive, I cheer with them. AllyCat Apr 2016 #33
maybe use that onethatcares Apr 2016 #34
Okay, now I want to protest the requirement to get a permit to protest. tclambert Apr 2016 #27
It is the same kind of non-violent civil disobedience the media always covered during the Rex Apr 2016 #13
hopefully 2naSalit Apr 2016 #31
Well it has the old guard scared and lashing out, so it must be a good thing. Rex Apr 2016 #37
It may have had something to do with civil disobedience nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #17
Presumably trespass. Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #19
Rall works for Sputnik now? Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #5
He fits right in there. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #23
K&R for visibility. Phlem Apr 2016 #9
cuddos to the protestors blackspade Apr 2016 #12
It is the usual suspects. Rex Apr 2016 #14
Amazing, isn't it? Sure seems not very democratic AllyCat Apr 2016 #26
That will piss the RWingers off! Rex Apr 2016 #15
This is what irony looks like: A Putin-owned media outlet decrying the victimization of activists. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #21
k and r AxionExcel Apr 2016 #22
KnR for the protesters! Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #38
 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
3. That's what I read...
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

I just wanted to know if anyone that keeps complaining about the arrests knew. It's kind of an important point.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
4. It is an impotant point
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:23 PM
Apr 2016

and I think they went there with the intention of being arrested as part of the protest.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
6. Or once again they failed to follow the most basic requirements necessary to gather.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:25 PM
Apr 2016

Basic organizational skills required is apparently nonexistent.

polmaven

(9,463 posts)
8. 2naSalit is correct..
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 04:20 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:41 PM - Edit history (1)

I know several people who were/are there. They expected, or even planned to be arrested as a point of their protest. My acquaintances were there to protest for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United decision.

onethatcares

(16,171 posts)
10. I was perusing the First Amendment
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 04:28 PM
Apr 2016

and missed the part about being able to protest as long as a permit was aquired.

If the gun nutz can state the 2nd allows them unfettered access to firearms, it's not too far a stretch
to expect unfettered access to protest.

Anything else is bullshit.

SalviaBlue

(2,917 posts)
16. I think that the idea was to get arrested so as to bring attention to their cause.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:41 PM
Apr 2016

It is a tactic as old as our democracy.

It worked.

It got your attention.

But go ahead and criticize them.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
20. I guess some here would have been against the Civil Rights movement as well.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:38 PM
Apr 2016

I'm chalking it up to their failure to read or care about history. I guess they and freepers have something in common.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
35. Oh, now. Inappropriate. I am for competence. The OP posted
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:48 PM
Apr 2016

a cartoon because WaPo and LA Times werent interested. These earnest people failed to get their message to many more than those they waved at from the highways. What they did is not nothing. It is a principled statement. But it's not enough for national media coverage, which has been the criticism here on DU. Hópefully they feel good about what they've done and enjoyed their bike rides and will have picked up a few techniques and lessons for next time.

BTW, Bernie would not only not say such a thing, but it would be taken by many like me as such a profound insult that Bernie would almost certainly have to disavow it if someone on his stage said it.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. Why are you bringing up Bernie? Stuck record?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:13 PM
Apr 2016

Who mentioned your name at all? I guess the truth hurt some huh? Seriously, go bother someone else with your ignorance of history.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
11. They are protesting the Corruption in politics.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:13 PM
Apr 2016

And, no, they didn't care if they were arrested. But, they didn't go just to be arrested.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
18. I knew what they were protesting
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 07:55 PM
Apr 2016

but watching the opening event when they made their pronouncement, it seemed they were intending to be arresting in the process. Was just how it seemed during the few minutes of their pronouncement that gave me that impression.

A worthwhile protest, I wish it was getting more press than it is but I do have to say that I have heard reports on NPR and MSNBC in the first 48 hours. I'm sure the corporate media is trying not to cover it but I think they'll be forced to by week's end... I hope.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
28. they were
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:55 PM
Apr 2016

somehow I am on their email list and got a message before the event titled something like "Are you ready to be arrested?"

I am not necessarily against what they are promoting - certain pieces of legislation, but the idea that 1,000 or 10,000 people should be able to extort legislation from Congress by being obnoxious and disruptive does not seem very democratic to me.

Rall's cartoon with the Congressman not yet arrested - well, a majority of voters in their district would not only seem unwilling to support their arrest, but will actually vote to re-elect most of them.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
29. It is called Civil Disobedience,
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:02 PM
Apr 2016

and is a traditional American response to unfair systems designed to keep us silent and hidden.

ALL of America is a Free Speech Zone, and the Constitution guarantees us the RIGHT of "Peaceful Assembly" and to have our grievances addressed by our government.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
30. I am not arguing that it isn't.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:11 PM
Apr 2016

I was trying to be brief without snark, not sure that worked out as anticipated.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. Permits are apparently almost never denied.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:31 PM
Apr 2016

It seems like they may have wanted to be arrested, not realizing that media have a general policy of not encouraging crime by reporting on it, ignored if the story's too good, of course, which this little run-of-the-mill group apparently wasn't.

I posted this guide to how to get a permit to protest on another thread. Its helpful invitation to protest groups struck me as kind of cute, and definitely democratic. (But then if I were a different sort it'd probably make me want to throw bombs.)

Especially living near a small city in the Deep South, where challenges to government are not usuallly looked on favorably. Think kangaroo courts of righteous citizens determined to teach "miscreants" not to make the same mistake twice.

http://washingtonpeacecenter.org/permitprocess

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
32. Oh, come on! Tell yourself that when you've
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:23 PM
Apr 2016

been trapped in traffic for two hours because others are exercising their constitutional rights. And then again next week. Maybe until you have to find another job or put your house up for sale and move because you can't reliably get to work and have been let go.

As a lifelong liberal, my moral code is mostly pretty simple -- one man's rights end where another's nose begins. To that point, exercise your freedoms and rights all you want.

AllyCat

(16,189 posts)
33. I do. As a progressive, I cheer with them.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:53 PM
Apr 2016

As a sensible person, I plan ahead and find a different route if I can't be delayed. Enjoy your sanitized democracy.

onethatcares

(16,171 posts)
34. maybe use that
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:07 PM
Apr 2016

GPS in most cars/phones or almost free on craiglist. You can dodge almost any protest with one of those thingies.

Maybe we can have "free speech zones" in the future.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
27. Okay, now I want to protest the requirement to get a permit to protest.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:37 PM
Apr 2016

Do you think they would grant me a permit for that protest?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. It is the same kind of non-violent civil disobedience the media always covered during the
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:19 PM
Apr 2016

Civil Rights movement...shame they only care about money now. Oh well the media that made Trump is going to implode one day.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
31. hopefully
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:12 PM
Apr 2016

there will be some kind of domino effect where the crash of the RWNJ faction brings down its infrastructure with it.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
37. Well it has the old guard scared and lashing out, so it must be a good thing.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:15 PM
Apr 2016

The conservatives hate it when anyone wants something besides them. People protesting, how illegal...yeah that is an argument a freeper would make.

Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
19. Presumably trespass.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:35 PM
Apr 2016

This was a typical direct action, people who wanted to be arrested lined up. The cops did not chase off the protestors who chose NOT to be arrested, so the idea that they were arrested for not having a permit violates common sense.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
12. cuddos to the protestors
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 05:14 PM
Apr 2016

I can't believe the number of people on DU that are dismissive of a protest calling for open and honest elections in an end to government corruption.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
21. This is what irony looks like: A Putin-owned media outlet decrying the victimization of activists.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:39 PM
Apr 2016

Boris Nemtsov is spinning in his grave.

Oh, and it's Ted Rall as well, this fucking guy:

http://www.gocomics.com/tedrall/2004/11/08

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»#DemocracySpring: This Is...