Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:54 AM Jun 2016

Sadiq Khan moves to ban body shaming ads from London transport

Is this a positive step against body shaming, or a way of promoting puritanism using nuanced language?
[hr]
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/13/sadiq-khan-moves-to-ban-body-shaming-ads-from-london-transport

Jasper Jackson - Last modified on Monday 13 June 2016 17.00 EDT


London Mayor Sadiq Khan has moved to ban body shaming ads, which promote unrealistic expectations about body image and health, on London’s transport network from next month.

Khan, elected in May, has told Transport for London to stop running ads amid concerns that the advertising “can demean people, particularly women”.

~ snip ~

In a statement, Khan said: “As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies. It is high time it came to an end.

“Nobody should feel pressurised, while they travel on the tube or bus, into unrealistic expectations surrounding their bodies and I want to send a clear message to the advertising industry about this.”

~ snip ~

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
1. What exactly is restricted?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:09 AM
Jun 2016

Images of women, images of good looking women, images of partially uncovered women, or images of women accompanied by demeaning text? It wasn't very clear.


I don't see what the outrage behind the ad is all about. It's an ad for fitness supplements. There is a fit woman who obviously works out. What were they supposed to do? Find someone 300 lbs overweight with early onset diabetes?


tblue37

(65,340 posts)
4. I wish people would not say "pressurized" when they mean "pressured."
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:15 AM
Jun 2016

Last edited Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:44 PM - Edit history (1)

Airplane cabins are pressurized.

That sort of malapropism is like fingernails on a blackboard to me No, actually, fingernails on a blackboard don't bother me--I am too hearing impaired. But they bother other people, and this sort of malapropism bothers me similarly.

Partly, I think, I cringe at the thought that every time someone says something like this, it gets out into the world where people will get used to seeing it, until it becomes normalized and then eventually replaces the original word.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
5. Great first step imo.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:32 AM
Jun 2016

It'll be the best step when the day comes that the purchasing public finds these distasteful as well. Sure, there's nothing wrong at all with the lady in the ad going to the beach, but the hinted message is that you need to look something like that to be able to go to the beach and wear a 2 piece, when there's also not a damn thing wrong with more realistic and average women doing the same thing, and there's nothing wrong with heavier/larger women doing the same thing either.

Make no mistake, this kind of advertising DOES propagate body shaming, and promotes the notion that you should look a certain way to go to the beach and feel comfortable with yourself.

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
10. You don't think that women have dignity?
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jun 2016

WTF?

If you want to body shame and objectify women then you'll have to find somewhere other than the London subway from now on.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
11. As it says in the OP
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jun 2016

" a way of promoting puritanism"

That is clearly where you are coming from when you say dignity.

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
12. As is says in the OP
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:11 PM
Jun 2016

"positive step against body shaming"

Cherry pick all you want, and enjoy your subscription to Maxim.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
13. Presumably only "dad bods" will be permitted in ads depicting males?
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jun 2016

Because men can also feel bad when confronted with ads depicting perfect male bodies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sadiq Khan moves to ban b...