General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Why not Texit?': Texas nationalists look to the Brexit vote for inspiration
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/19/texas-secession-movement-brexit-eu-referendum
<snip>
How closely is Daniel Miller tracking the news ahead of the referendum about whether Britain should leave the European Union? Hourly! he grins. The Suns recent editorial calling for the UKs departure got him quite excited.
Miller, though, is not from London or Liverpool. He hails from Longview, Texas, and we are talking in a cafe in the bleakly industrial Gulf coast town of Port Arthur, some 5,000 miles from Westminster.
There are a lot of people asking, if Brexit why not Texit? he says. I do talk with some folks over there on a pretty regular basis that are involved in Ukip and the Conservative party.
The arguments are fundamentally identical, he insists. You could take Britain out and replace it with Texas. You could take EU out and replace it with US. You could take Brussels out and replace it with Washington DC. You could give you guys a nice Texas drawl and no one would know any different. So much of it is exactly the same.
Buoyed by the rearguard action at the battle of the Alamo, Texas toiled to free itself from Mexican rule and was an independent nation from 1836 to 1845. But its fiercely solitary spirit did not fade when it became part of the union. Texas Independence Day, 2 March, is still an annual state holiday. In 2003 a state law was passed requiring schoolchildren to pledge allegiance daily to the Texas flag as well as the US flag.
h political avenues and calls for the people of Texas to decide via a referendum. Miller claims that the group has 260,000 supporters. It has fans in Russia among mischief-makers who would relish the break-up of the United States.
It also has advocates in the Texas Republican party, even though removing one of the biggest and most reliably red states from the US would make it far easier for the Democrats to win presidential elections.
Shortly after Obamas re-election, the White House was forced to respond to a Texit petition that garnered more than 125,000 votes. The answer was no.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)to texas....remove all the military bases...and build a wall....around texas...hell....doesn't sound so bad to me....lol
marble falls
(57,397 posts)I don't ever want to run into fugitive Texas secessionists who jump ship.
CanonRay
(14,123 posts)Smart move
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,375 posts)... from the cemetery at Ft Sam Houston and others. They'll need to be repatriated to the United States.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Most people realize that if TX seceded, it would instantly become a Third World Nation.
malaise
(269,237 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Have you tried Papua New Guinea? Very similar flavor to JBM-it was started with Jamaican seedlings.
malaise
(269,237 posts)have to give it a try. Having a lovely cup of BM right now. Have a nice day bro
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Texas has spent decades wooing American companies from other states with its low tax rates and lax regulatory structure. The moment Texas became an independent nation, all of those companies would become foreign corporations (not multinationals...full blown foreign corporations). The companies would be fucked, and would flee Texas en masse. And we're not talking little companies either. American Airlines? Foreign airlines can't fly domestic American routes. Waste Management? Buy local clauses will prevent them from controlling regional waste services in America. AT&T? Foreign companies can't legally own U.S. telecom infrastructure. And everyone from JC Penney to just about every oil company in North America? Welcome to tarrif's boys and girls! Nafta isn't going to help your non-signatory "independent" Texas! And you won't have any representation in Congress to stop it!
ALL of these companies would flee the state within a year to avoid financial destruction. Texas would be fucked.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Go for it, mensas.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)like say Germany/Deutschland.
unblock
(52,399 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Paladin
(28,280 posts)One thing about you DU Texas-Bashers: you're consistent.
unblock
(52,399 posts)i lived in austin for seven years, mrs. unblock even longer, and she's lived elsewhere in texas as well. we're planning to retire there eventually.
not sure how much time you've spent in austin but variants of that joke get made all the time there.
it's not bashing *texas* it's bashing the secessionist theme that keeps recurring and resonating in various parts of texas -- except, for the most part, austin
Paladin
(28,280 posts)I still have lots of old school friends there---most of them very, very conservative. Sorry I missed your humor; generally the "Only Cool Place In Texas" label is applied to Austin in a dead-serious, dead-wrong manner.
And if you're planning on retiring in Austin, I hope to hell you're saving every spare dollar, or that you're coming into a sizeable inheritance. My folks paid $14,000 in the 1950's for the modest home on the north side where I grew up; houses on that street are now going for $500,000 or thereabouts......
unblock
(52,399 posts)i looked into buying a house in the 90s. i had enough for a down payment on a small house. best i could find was under a flight path. personally that didn't bother me except i knew i'd have to sell at some point and i know being under a flight path is a major turnoff for many. just not a good investment, i thought.
you know where the story's going, after mueller airport closed it was no longer under a flight path. between that and austin's growth, that house is now over half a million. coulda had it for under $80k....
Paladin
(28,280 posts)Back in the early 60's, the sonic booms from the B-52 bombers would rattle our school rooms, and on Fridays the air raid sirens would be tested so we could all hear what imminent nuclear war warnings sounded like. Whole different world.....
unblock
(52,399 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Mayor[edit]
Mike Rawlings (Incumbent)
Marcos Ronquillo
Richard P. Sheridan (Write-In)
Candidate Vote Number Vote Percentage[12]
Mike Rawlings 30,692 72.95%
Marcos Ronquillo 11,383 27.05%
niyad
(113,668 posts)yellowcanine
(35,703 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Vogon_Glory
(9,133 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 20, 2016, 03:15 PM - Edit history (1)
When Texas seceded from Mexico, we found ourselves in a continuous war with our southern neighbor, few internal improvements, the need for high military expenditures, and a massive debt.
When Texas seceded from the US in 1861, our economy went to pot, we got blockaded, attacked by Comanches, and ran up even more debt.
I think Texas ought to remain in the US.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)North that they got re-admitted into the union.
yellowcanine
(35,703 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)laugh when they talk about selling oil to us at a huge markup if they split off.
We'll just buy it from other countries and tell them to pound sand.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)The EU is not a country. Texas is part of a country. And how do they think they'd defend themselves? LOL they would be taken over by Mexico almost immediately. Do they expect we would defend them? lol.
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)PJMcK
(22,059 posts)Thanks for posting this civics lesson, Kilgore. it clearly explains the issues surrounding the suggested secession by Texas from the USA.
The first part of the video's answer is in respect of the Texas economy. This answer is far too simplistic and doesn't address huge areas of the Texas economy. I call your attention to Xithras' post, #49 above regarding the crushing impact secession would bring.
The second part is about the legal aspects and demonstrates why states cannot leave the Union. But one pie chart stood out. It showed the actual ratio of Texans in favor of or opposed to secession. The tiny sliver of secessionists was almost completely obscured by those opposed. Yet this micro-minority gets media attention giving them credibility and a megaphone they don't deserve.
The stupid runs deep in some people, but you already knew that.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)The far right in France, Sweden and many other European countries want their countries out of the EU. The Texas GOP also wants the US out of the UN and every other international agreement and organization they can think of.
It seems that the far right is very big on states' rights, national sovereignty and 'us vs them'. They are not so big on international cooperation.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)malaise
(269,237 posts)Thanks
Iggo
(47,579 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,794 posts)However, here is what they could also do. IIRC, the document that admitted the Republic of Texas to the Union allows the state to break up into as many as five states. So it's be like Texas -- but with 8 more Senate seats.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The Texas Annexation Treaty you allude to (originally created to balance slave v non-slave holding states) has been superseded by Art. 4, Section 3 of the US Constitution. Texas really has no more, nor no less ability to break into multiple states than any other state currently has.
"New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union; but no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress of the United States...."
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,794 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,138 posts)The annexation of Texas was approved by a Joint Resolution of Congress (here) and mentions nothing about secession.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Joint Resolution for Annexing Texas to the United States (approved by congress spring of '45) is informally called the Texas Annexation Treaty. originally, a satirical jab by the Whigs towards Houston after the US senate rejected the Tyler-Texas Treaty.
(Source: Storm over Texas by Joe Sibley)
NYC Liberal
(20,138 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)And that Texas-committee would no longer have indirect control over what kids learn US-wide.
Vinca
(50,319 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)"Passport please."
"What is the purpose of your visit?"
"Do you have a visa?"
"Alright, we're gonna need your fingerprints and your biometrics."
"No, the 2nd Amendment does not apply to you, because you are not a US-citizen. Your gun stays in Texas unless you have a special permit to import weapons."
"That's a lot of cash money you have with you. We're gonna have to impound the money, because it could be connected to drug-trade. Don't worry: You can get your money back if you can prove that this money has nothing to do with drugs or any other crime."
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Let's keep some perspective that MANY good people live there, including Texas Democrats.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Still, you're talking what is essentially the right wing equivalent to California in terms of population.
malaise
(269,237 posts)they were all born there as was his sister - second sister lived their for decades.
I posted an interesting article
Response to malaise (Original post)
Hekate This message was self-deleted by its author.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)No, please! Please dont go!
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Just give us time.