General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBlack Lives Matter protesters block a road in Carbondale, get hit by a car
https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/752589035395289089tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Highways are usually traveled by people just trying to get by in life. Might be a truck driver getting paid by the mile, a family on the way to see a sick loved one, or any numbers of reasons. How about blocking the streets around city hall or capital buildings and leave the average person out of it. They didn't cause your rage. I'm sure this will piss some people off, but what the hell.
malaise
(269,157 posts)gordianot
(15,245 posts)I take it his presence on any highway in New Jersey would be an act of suicide.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)BlueNoMatterWho
(880 posts)GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)I guess they were right after all
840high
(17,196 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Kindergarten taught me the relevant difference between 'civil protest' and 'playing'. No doubt, you learned the same-- but need to ignore it as such to better validate your narrative, regardless of whether your parents were right or not...
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)like Donald Trump, Rush Limbaugh, or Karl Rove.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Why can't they just get gunned down in the streets and send somber, Shackletonian missives to their local newspapers? Why do those people have to be so confrontational?
Igel
(35,356 posts)Bystanders were incidental in being hurt.
This is later "civil" disobedience, the "look at me--and yeah, you're the target because you're all guilty" kind.
One is targeted. The other is tantrum.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"One is targeted. The other is tantrum..."
I imagine many people maintain the pretense of being wise enough to tell the difference-- all the better to validate a bias: invent a premise, fail to show objective evidence, come to an already decided conclusion.
Rational. Very, very rational.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)JustinL
(722 posts)In 1964, Brooklyn CORE planned to block traffic around the World's Fair, at the same time Senators were filibustering the Civil Rights Act. From a 2014 Slate article:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2014/04/core_s_1964_stall_in_the_planned_civil_rights_protest_that_kept_thousands.html
jtunes
(74 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Don't be any denser than you have to be. It hurts your argument.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Standing in the middle of the road is very dangerous.
Heeeeers Johnny
(423 posts)It's only a matter of time until Darwin catches up with some of these assholes.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)For years, at top characteristic of liberalism was tolerance. Inconvenience is usually an objective of a protest. Life isn't supposed to go on as normal until the issue protested is addressed.
Would it be different if the protests were labor, or LGBT, or feminist rights?
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)during my life.
BumRushDaShow
(129,469 posts)"die-ins".
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)City Hall: a couple minutes in it gets to the traffic issues....
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Now, on what was marketed as a liberal board when I joined, protests for fair, not racially profiled treatment by authorities is too inconvenient for liberals. That doesn't even seem centrist or moderate.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)for mentioning ACT UP disrupting church services over 30 years after the fact:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024338037#post27
malaise
(269,157 posts)Skittles
(153,193 posts)it's stupid
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Honestly, I get the feeling that people think history started yesterday or this century. How many folks will see the name Mario Savio and not know a thing about him?
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I'm surprised these protesters dont get run over more often. There are maniacs on the road these days.
And blocking people are not going to make them liberal progressives. They are not going to "check their privilege." They aren't going to sit back and listen to black people more now. They will instead blame BLM for why they just got fired for being late to their job. Or what happens if someone is trying to get to the Emergency Room?
These people on the highway are not the ones gunning down black people. Go protest in front of the police station. They are the ones doing it. Go to city council meetings and demand your local politicians hold the police accountable. That's what you need to start doing.
And most important of all....VOTE!!!!! I'm tired of people doing protests and marches and then they sit their ass home on election day. Fuck those people. Just like the people in Britain now doing these protests over the Brexit vote when most of these same protesters SAT HOME during the vote. You want to sit home on the election....fine. But in my opinion when you do that....you have no right to be angry at the result.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I support their actions. BLM is going to visit you in the streets, at your podium, sporting events, parks, etc. it is how to make the oppressors take notice. I really do think the actions they took aimed at Democrats this season was on spot and on time. Sorry about what happened here. Not going to watch the video.
zz-la
(224 posts)A protest is design to produce civil disobedience and disrupt normal daily life, so that normal, decent people get off their asses and decide that they should call their congress person and demand that the government get off their lazy asses and do something about a generation of young black people being executed by police. If it happens to cause you to be late for wherever you are going than consider that a protest mission accomplished. If protesters just stood in front of city hall with a poster and a glass of ice tea than people would just drive by and say, "Oh look honey a protest. How nice." They would watch it on the news from the comfort of their safe home and then turn it off and go to bed never giving the issue a second thought.
BlueNoMatterWho
(880 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Are going to say "Man, those folks have a good point, I should help them" or "What a bunch of assholes, screw them and whatever they are for?"
There is a good way to protest that gets attention to your cause and gets people on your side. Blocking highways isn't turning anyone who was caught to the traffic snarl into a supporter of your cause, whatever it is.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)been very actively ignoring for years on end, when they have failed to respond to alarms raised in less confrontational ways. When a country has done nothing in the face of 30,000 deaths and counting, it's time to focus their attention on that problem before some of those who are late for work are simply late, not tardy but dead themselves.
sarisataka
(18,773 posts)If I am not quite understanding the finer points of protesting. However if your protest is not designed to get people to support you isn't the protest futile?
I can understand getting people talking about an issue. There are three possible outcomes to their discussion. 1 they understand the point of your protest and choose to support the cause you are advocating. 2 they disagree with you reject your cause and will then oppose it. Or 3 they will continue to be indifferent.
Only one of those three outcomes is beneficial to the protesters, assuming they wish to change the status quo.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Not exactly a Dale Carnegie approach to winning friends and influencing people. More like How to Make Enemies and Piss-off Those Who Might Have Been Inclined to Help Your Cause.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)There was a very disturbing video being distributed around Facebook showing those instances, and people were cheering it on. I've seen lots of right wingers rant about running them over as well.
I realize this particular incident was just an accident. Still, it's sad to see people celebrating it.
It isn't OK to run people over just because you're inconvenienced by their protest.
tenderfoot
(8,438 posts)eom
gollygee
(22,336 posts)They have to be inconvenient to work.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)From getting to work, or to take the kids to school, or to the hospital promote any cause?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Protests like this, inconvenient ones, have been done for a very long time, and have worked.
You're saying you don't think they should work, but you can read about times they have worked right in this thread. And if you do even a bit of googling, you'll find more.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)This is counterproductive behavior that alienates 90% of the people observing, and 100% of the people stuck on the road because of an ill-planned protest.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Blocking roads, entry into buildings, etc. People in this thread thinking it should be alienating a high percentage of people doesn't mean anything.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)What interesting timing.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'm referring to the threads back when BLM was interrupting Sanders events. Saying something as simple as "I'm not sure that's the most effective tactic" was always met with accusations of racism. I'm glad those days are over and we can now speak freely on the topic
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)jtunes
(74 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)SuperDutyTX
(79 posts)It's completely counter-productive to their cause, and let's be honest, if you've seen the video, this wasn't some guy plowing through protesters at any speed. This guy got out of his car, made some kind of statement (who knows what), then slowly moved through the roadblock at speeds less than 5MPH.
The result for the driver was getting chased by the crowd, getting punched in the face, and had fireworks thrown in his vehicle while he waited for police.
This is not the way to protest the cause in my opinion. Peaceful/Non-Violent protests are the way to win public opinion, not what happened here.
BlueNoMatterWho
(880 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)guess what, I'm not going to call my congressman when I get home to express sympathy for whatever cause the highway blockers are protesting about. I'm just going to think that they are inconsiderate assholes.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)some twit twittering? Yes I know I have zero respect for Twitterers.
BlueNoMatterWho
(880 posts)PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)It galvanizes the opinion of the blocked motorists AGAINST the cause.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)Warpy
(111,341 posts)since they're also blocking fire and other emergency vehicles.
Gandhi's resistance was more in the form of non cooperation--with the salt monopoly, with laws mandating the purchase of cloth from England instead of domestic manufacture, with curfews of all sorts, and by boycotts.
While I know BLM's tactics have to be different and inconveniencing their fellow citizens in one way or another is essential to get enough press to WAKE PEOPLE UP to what's been happening out there, blocking highways doesn't seem to be the best one.
Blocking big city streets is a better idea. Emergency vehicles can find alternate routes and people will be inconvenienced enough that they'll squawk and it will make the news.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Lancero
(3,014 posts)[img][/img]
Some people are using ambulances as a socially acceptable excuse to slam protesters with whom they disagree. Its not really about the ambulances or the medical emergencies: Its about a protest and a movement that some folks would never agree with, no matter what they do. This kind of hypocrisy is problematic.
One local mom, Nicole Aliberti, can personally attest to this. I find it disingenuous that people keep complaining about ambulances not being able to get to Boston hospitals due to the protests, Aliberti told me. I once experienced being in the back of an ambulance that was transporting my critically ill baby in stopped traffic due to a Red Sox game. No one would move out of the way, and we had to find another route to the hospital.
...During baseball season, ambulances are routinely prevented from reaching major Boston hospitals in an efficient manner. I wonder whether the people who are attempting to discredit the #BlackLivesMatter protest also speak out against the Red Sox and their fans for blocking traffic? After all, although the intent of the Red Sox fans and these protesters differ, the outcome is the same: Predictable though Red Sox traffic may be, emergencies are by nature unpredictable, and emergency vehicles do become stuck on their way to the Longwood Medical Area on game days.
Blocking off the highways is still a idiotic tactic that isn't likely to get them much support, but considering the number of 'acceptable' actions that block off a ambulance...