Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Black Lives Matter protesters block a road in Carbondale, get hit by a car (Original Post) BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 OP
Ya know, i really do not understand the blocking of highways. A city street maybe, but a highway tonyt53 Jul 2016 #1
Unless you're Chris Christie of course n/t malaise Jul 2016 #42
Now that tub of lard is one my F-150 would have a hard time stopping for. gordianot Jul 2016 #53
Edmund Petus Bridge is a highway. Jim Beard Jul 2016 #57
Or an emergency vehicle getting to a hospital. BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #2
My parents taught me to not play in traffic at a pretty young age GummyBearz Jul 2016 #3
Seems we shared parents. 840high Jul 2016 #33
Kindergarten taught me the relevant difference between 'civil protest' and 'playing'. LanternWaste Jul 2016 #45
I think some people should have been encouraged to play in traffic puffy socks Jul 2016 #51
Don't the protesters know how inconvenient it is? gratuitous Jul 2016 #4
Civil disobedience targeted the guilty. Igel Jul 2016 #5
I imagine many people maintain the pretense of being wise enough to tell the difference LanternWaste Jul 2016 #46
if someone did it to them, they would be extremely angry Skittles Jul 2016 #16
Did MLK block highways? Did Gandhi? (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2016 #38
Mandela did a lot more than block highways. Did MLK ever condemn blocking traffic? JustinL Jul 2016 #50
ever consider that the patient dying in an ambulance on a blocked road might be African American? nt jtunes Jul 2016 #54
Please gratuitous Jul 2016 #55
I am surprised it doesn't happen more often. yeoman6987 Jul 2016 #6
Play stupid games... win stupid prizes. Heeeeers Johnny Jul 2016 #7
#hondalivesmatter Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #8
Knew this would happen sooner or later. romanic Jul 2016 #9
Wondering if the above responses reflect liberal orientation HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #10
If it was an LGBT protest, BLM would have shut that down as well Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #11
Thanks for ignoring my question, but, FYI all the groups mentioned have gone to the street HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #12
Except when groups like Act-Up started the tactic of BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #14
Short answer: Nope. Here is a news report from 1989, ACT UP blocks NYC streets at Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #13
Protesting was a pretty common approach to social problems for liberals all my life HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #15
Oh, I'm used to DU having strong reactions to disruptive protest, I've been castigated Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #23
+1,000 n/t malaise Jul 2016 #43
I don't think protesting in the middle of the road/highway is advisable for anyone Skittles Jul 2016 #17
Or if it was Mario Savio saying it, instead of those other people? gratuitous Jul 2016 #28
You know how many times I've seen road rage? davidn3600 Jul 2016 #18
Hope they are ok. NCTraveler Jul 2016 #19
That's the whole fucking point of a protest zz-la Jul 2016 #20
Making people late for work is one thing. Blocking access for emergency vehicles is another. BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #21
Do you think the people made late for jobs or family events Lee-Lee Jul 2016 #22
It's not for seeking supporters, it's for getting people to talk about the issue they have Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #24
Please forgive sarisataka Jul 2016 #31
Okay, but once that discussion has begun you want them to come to a supportive conclusion. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #34
And what they're going to be talking about is how those asshats effed-up their day. WillowTree Jul 2016 #40
Some of the Black Lives Matter protesters have been run over, intentionally KMOD Jul 2016 #25
+1000 gollygee Jul 2016 #27
I have a feeling some here are members of the cheering squad tenderfoot Jul 2016 #30
Protests are messy, and protests work gollygee Jul 2016 #26
How does keeping people TeddyR Jul 2016 #52
It brings the issue to people's attention gollygee Jul 2016 #61
See posts 36 and 39 below TeddyR Jul 2016 #63
These kinds of protests have historically worked gollygee Jul 2016 #64
Now that Bernie is out of the race, we can critique BLM tactics without being called racist. arcane1 Jul 2016 #29
i support civil disobedience. I am not sure what Bernie has to do with any of this. nt La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #35
I do too. arcane1 Jul 2016 #44
That is a nice change. Vattel Jul 2016 #56
Darwins Theory is alive and well. Lil Missy Jul 2016 #32
I love your sig line. NaturalHigh Jul 2016 #47
Works with humans too ..... Lil Missy Jul 2016 #48
did you get that line from Amanda? nt jtunes Jul 2016 #59
I have no idea who that is. So no. Lil Missy Jul 2016 #68
Counter-productive SuperDutyTX Jul 2016 #36
Well said. BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #37
If some group blocks the highway and makes me get stuck in traffic for 4 hours, Nye Bevan Jul 2016 #39
Is there a actual news source or just whistler162 Jul 2016 #41
Video at link. BlueNoMatterWho Jul 2016 #49
Blocking the highway DAMAGES the BLM cause. PlanetaryOrbit Jul 2016 #58
It seems for some breathing damages the BLM cause, when other activist groups have done similar uponit7771 Jul 2016 #62
Blocking highways is not a great tactic Warpy Jul 2016 #60
EarlG: The American tradition of inconveniencing motorists... pinboy3niner Jul 2016 #65
+1000 !!! Nt gollygee Jul 2016 #66
For the claims of 'but, but, muh ambulances!' Lancero Jul 2016 #67
Is the driver okay? NaturalHigh Jul 2016 #69
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. Ya know, i really do not understand the blocking of highways. A city street maybe, but a highway
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jul 2016

Highways are usually traveled by people just trying to get by in life. Might be a truck driver getting paid by the mile, a family on the way to see a sick loved one, or any numbers of reasons. How about blocking the streets around city hall or capital buildings and leave the average person out of it. They didn't cause your rage. I'm sure this will piss some people off, but what the hell.

gordianot

(15,245 posts)
53. Now that tub of lard is one my F-150 would have a hard time stopping for.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jul 2016

I take it his presence on any highway in New Jersey would be an act of suicide.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
45. Kindergarten taught me the relevant difference between 'civil protest' and 'playing'.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jul 2016

Kindergarten taught me the relevant difference between 'civil protest' and 'playing'. No doubt, you learned the same-- but need to ignore it as such to better validate your narrative, regardless of whether your parents were right or not...

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
51. I think some people should have been encouraged to play in traffic
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jul 2016

like Donald Trump, Rush Limbaugh, or Karl Rove.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. Don't the protesters know how inconvenient it is?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 05:24 PM
Jul 2016

Why can't they just get gunned down in the streets and send somber, Shackletonian missives to their local newspapers? Why do those people have to be so confrontational?

Igel

(35,356 posts)
5. Civil disobedience targeted the guilty.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jul 2016

Bystanders were incidental in being hurt.

This is later "civil" disobedience, the "look at me--and yeah, you're the target because you're all guilty" kind.

One is targeted. The other is tantrum.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
46. I imagine many people maintain the pretense of being wise enough to tell the difference
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jul 2016

"One is targeted. The other is tantrum..."

I imagine many people maintain the pretense of being wise enough to tell the difference-- all the better to validate a bias: invent a premise, fail to show objective evidence, come to an already decided conclusion.

Rational. Very, very rational.

JustinL

(722 posts)
50. Mandela did a lot more than block highways. Did MLK ever condemn blocking traffic?
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jul 2016

In 1964, Brooklyn CORE planned to block traffic around the World's Fair, at the same time Senators were filibustering the Civil Rights Act. From a 2014 Slate article:

Although Brooklyn CORE's rhetoric was belligerent and confrontational--radically different from that of mainstream activists--the stall-in would be a pure act of nonviolent civil disobedience. Declaring the protest as something other than that was pure spin. In a plaintive letter to (the NAACP's Roy) Wilkins, Martin Luther King admitted that he considered the stall-in a "tactical error" but flatly refused to condemn the young activists. "Which is worse, a 'Stall-In' at the World's Fair or a 'Stall-In' in the United States Senate?" he pointedly asked. "The former merely ties up the traffic of a single city. But the latter seeks to tie up the traffic of history, and endanger the psychological lives of twenty million people."


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2014/04/core_s_1964_stall_in_the_planned_civil_rights_protest_that_kept_thousands.html
 

jtunes

(74 posts)
54. ever consider that the patient dying in an ambulance on a blocked road might be African American? nt
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 05:10 PM
Jul 2016

Heeeeers Johnny

(423 posts)
7. Play stupid games... win stupid prizes.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 05:48 PM
Jul 2016

It's only a matter of time until Darwin catches up with some of these assholes.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
10. Wondering if the above responses reflect liberal orientation
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jul 2016

For years, at top characteristic of liberalism was tolerance. Inconvenience is usually an objective of a protest. Life isn't supposed to go on as normal until the issue protested is addressed.

Would it be different if the protests were labor, or LGBT, or feminist rights?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
12. Thanks for ignoring my question, but, FYI all the groups mentioned have gone to the street
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jul 2016

during my life.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
13. Short answer: Nope. Here is a news report from 1989, ACT UP blocks NYC streets at
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jul 2016

City Hall: a couple minutes in it gets to the traffic issues....



HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
15. Protesting was a pretty common approach to social problems for liberals all my life
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jul 2016

Now, on what was marketed as a liberal board when I joined, protests for fair, not racially profiled treatment by authorities is too inconvenient for liberals. That doesn't even seem centrist or moderate.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. Oh, I'm used to DU having strong reactions to disruptive protest, I've been castigated
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jul 2016

for mentioning ACT UP disrupting church services over 30 years after the fact:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024338037#post27

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
28. Or if it was Mario Savio saying it, instead of those other people?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:18 PM
Jul 2016

Honestly, I get the feeling that people think history started yesterday or this century. How many folks will see the name Mario Savio and not know a thing about him?

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
18. You know how many times I've seen road rage?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jul 2016

I'm surprised these protesters dont get run over more often. There are maniacs on the road these days.

And blocking people are not going to make them liberal progressives. They are not going to "check their privilege." They aren't going to sit back and listen to black people more now. They will instead blame BLM for why they just got fired for being late to their job. Or what happens if someone is trying to get to the Emergency Room?

These people on the highway are not the ones gunning down black people. Go protest in front of the police station. They are the ones doing it. Go to city council meetings and demand your local politicians hold the police accountable. That's what you need to start doing.

And most important of all....VOTE!!!!! I'm tired of people doing protests and marches and then they sit their ass home on election day. Fuck those people. Just like the people in Britain now doing these protests over the Brexit vote when most of these same protesters SAT HOME during the vote. You want to sit home on the election....fine. But in my opinion when you do that....you have no right to be angry at the result.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
19. Hope they are ok.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:52 PM
Jul 2016

I support their actions. BLM is going to visit you in the streets, at your podium, sporting events, parks, etc. it is how to make the oppressors take notice. I really do think the actions they took aimed at Democrats this season was on spot and on time. Sorry about what happened here. Not going to watch the video.

zz-la

(224 posts)
20. That's the whole fucking point of a protest
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jul 2016

A protest is design to produce civil disobedience and disrupt normal daily life, so that normal, decent people get off their asses and decide that they should call their congress person and demand that the government get off their lazy asses and do something about a generation of young black people being executed by police. If it happens to cause you to be late for wherever you are going than consider that a protest mission accomplished. If protesters just stood in front of city hall with a poster and a glass of ice tea than people would just drive by and say, "Oh look honey a protest. How nice." They would watch it on the news from the comfort of their safe home and then turn it off and go to bed never giving the issue a second thought.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
22. Do you think the people made late for jobs or family events
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jul 2016

Are going to say "Man, those folks have a good point, I should help them" or "What a bunch of assholes, screw them and whatever they are for?"

There is a good way to protest that gets attention to your cause and gets people on your side. Blocking highways isn't turning anyone who was caught to the traffic snarl into a supporter of your cause, whatever it is.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
24. It's not for seeking supporters, it's for getting people to talk about the issue they have
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:10 PM
Jul 2016

been very actively ignoring for years on end, when they have failed to respond to alarms raised in less confrontational ways. When a country has done nothing in the face of 30,000 deaths and counting, it's time to focus their attention on that problem before some of those who are late for work are simply late, not tardy but dead themselves.

sarisataka

(18,773 posts)
31. Please forgive
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jul 2016

If I am not quite understanding the finer points of protesting. However if your protest is not designed to get people to support you isn't the protest futile?

I can understand getting people talking about an issue. There are three possible outcomes to their discussion. 1 they understand the point of your protest and choose to support the cause you are advocating. 2 they disagree with you reject your cause and will then oppose it. Or 3 they will continue to be indifferent.

Only one of those three outcomes is beneficial to the protesters, assuming they wish to change the status quo.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
40. And what they're going to be talking about is how those asshats effed-up their day.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 12:43 AM
Jul 2016

Not exactly a Dale Carnegie approach to winning friends and influencing people. More like How to Make Enemies and Piss-off Those Who Might Have Been Inclined to Help Your Cause.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
25. Some of the Black Lives Matter protesters have been run over, intentionally
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:12 PM
Jul 2016

There was a very disturbing video being distributed around Facebook showing those instances, and people were cheering it on. I've seen lots of right wingers rant about running them over as well.

I realize this particular incident was just an accident. Still, it's sad to see people celebrating it.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
52. How does keeping people
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jul 2016

From getting to work, or to take the kids to school, or to the hospital promote any cause?

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
61. It brings the issue to people's attention
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 06:08 PM
Jul 2016

Protests like this, inconvenient ones, have been done for a very long time, and have worked.

You're saying you don't think they should work, but you can read about times they have worked right in this thread. And if you do even a bit of googling, you'll find more.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
63. See posts 36 and 39 below
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 06:52 PM
Jul 2016

This is counterproductive behavior that alienates 90% of the people observing, and 100% of the people stuck on the road because of an ill-planned protest.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
64. These kinds of protests have historically worked
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jul 2016

Blocking roads, entry into buildings, etc. People in this thread thinking it should be alienating a high percentage of people doesn't mean anything.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
29. Now that Bernie is out of the race, we can critique BLM tactics without being called racist.
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 07:24 PM
Jul 2016

What interesting timing.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
44. I do too.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jul 2016

I'm referring to the threads back when BLM was interrupting Sanders events. Saying something as simple as "I'm not sure that's the most effective tactic" was always met with accusations of racism. I'm glad those days are over and we can now speak freely on the topic

SuperDutyTX

(79 posts)
36. Counter-productive
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 12:10 AM
Jul 2016

It's completely counter-productive to their cause, and let's be honest, if you've seen the video, this wasn't some guy plowing through protesters at any speed. This guy got out of his car, made some kind of statement (who knows what), then slowly moved through the roadblock at speeds less than 5MPH.

The result for the driver was getting chased by the crowd, getting punched in the face, and had fireworks thrown in his vehicle while he waited for police.

This is not the way to protest the cause in my opinion. Peaceful/Non-Violent protests are the way to win public opinion, not what happened here.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
39. If some group blocks the highway and makes me get stuck in traffic for 4 hours,
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jul 2016

guess what, I'm not going to call my congressman when I get home to express sympathy for whatever cause the highway blockers are protesting about. I'm just going to think that they are inconsiderate assholes.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
41. Is there a actual news source or just
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 05:31 AM
Jul 2016

some twit twittering? Yes I know I have zero respect for Twitterers.

PlanetaryOrbit

(155 posts)
58. Blocking the highway DAMAGES the BLM cause.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 05:29 PM
Jul 2016

It galvanizes the opinion of the blocked motorists AGAINST the cause.

Warpy

(111,341 posts)
60. Blocking highways is not a great tactic
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 05:52 PM
Jul 2016

since they're also blocking fire and other emergency vehicles.

Gandhi's resistance was more in the form of non cooperation--with the salt monopoly, with laws mandating the purchase of cloth from England instead of domestic manufacture, with curfews of all sorts, and by boycotts.

While I know BLM's tactics have to be different and inconveniencing their fellow citizens in one way or another is essential to get enough press to WAKE PEOPLE UP to what's been happening out there, blocking highways doesn't seem to be the best one.

Blocking big city streets is a better idea. Emergency vehicles can find alternate routes and people will be inconvenienced enough that they'll squawk and it will make the news.

Lancero

(3,014 posts)
67. For the claims of 'but, but, muh ambulances!'
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jul 2016
https://rebeccahains.com/2015/01/15/discrediting-blacklivesmatter-with-ambulance-concerns-is-disingenuous-heres-why/

[img][/img]

Some people are using ambulances as a socially acceptable excuse to slam protesters with whom they disagree. It’s not really about the ambulances or the medical emergencies: It’s about a protest and a movement that some folks would never agree with, no matter what they do. This kind of hypocrisy is problematic.

One local mom, Nicole Aliberti, can personally attest to this. “I find it disingenuous that people keep complaining about ambulances not being able to get to Boston hospitals due to the protests,” Aliberti told me. “I once experienced being in the back of an ambulance that was transporting my critically ill baby in stopped traffic due to a Red Sox game. No one would move out of the way, and we had to find another route to the hospital.”

...During baseball season, ambulances are routinely prevented from reaching major Boston hospitals in an efficient manner. I wonder whether the people who are attempting to discredit the #BlackLivesMatter protest also speak out against the Red Sox and their fans for blocking traffic? After all, although the intent of the Red Sox fans and these protesters differ, the outcome is the same: Predictable though Red Sox traffic may be, emergencies are by nature unpredictable, and emergency vehicles do become stuck on their way to the Longwood Medical Area on game days.


Blocking off the highways is still a idiotic tactic that isn't likely to get them much support, but considering the number of 'acceptable' actions that block off a ambulance...
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Black Lives Matter protes...