HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Heavily tatted White supr...

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 03:20 AM

 

Heavily tatted White supremacist kills three





Police found the bodies of the two men outside the house at 4006 NW 417th Street, while the woman was dead inside.
None of the victims' names have been released, but Sergeant Tony Barnes told the New York Daily News they were all white.
Police believe Luyster was looking for something when he opened fire.
Police launched an online appeal showing Luyster's tattoos, which includes 'skinhead' scrawled over his abdomen. Adolf Hitler and other Nazi Germany symbols are tattooed on his back.
A friend wrote on his Facebook page on Saturday: 'My heart breaks that my comrade Brent Luyster is on the loose with multiple body bags in tow, brother ODIN is calling for you, may you have a proper taking into Valhalla......'
Police received a tip and arrested Luyster at 4.15pm on Saturday while he was in his gold Ford Explorer on the Ocean Beach Highway.
The Cowlitz County Sheriff's Office issued a tweet announcing Luyster's arrest, adding that he was taken into custody 'peacefully by his choice'.


___!!

The 35-year-old pleaded guilty and served 90 days in jail for rioting with a weapon after he was accused of pointing a loaded gun at a black man in a Vancouver, Washington, tavern because he became angered by an interracial couple.
He used a racial slur and when another black customer intervened, Luyster started threatening to kill the couple, according to court documents cited by KPTV.
The Columbian reported he was involved in a drive-by shooting, taking a motor vehicle without permission, rioting while armed, malicious mischief and theft, among many others.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3694080/White-supremacist-arrested-woman-shot-face-drove-two-miles-convenience-store-wrote-note-telling-police-killed-three-couldn-t-speak.html#ixzz4EeVGFLhV

48 replies, 8303 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 48 replies Author Time Post
Reply Heavily tatted White supremacist kills three (Original post)
Liberal_in_LA Jul 2016 OP
MADem Jul 2016 #1
pinboy3niner Jul 2016 #2
Motown_Johnny Jul 2016 #11
MADem Jul 2016 #12
EL34x4 Jul 2016 #16
PatSeg Jul 2016 #39
AgadorSparticus Jul 2016 #42
AgadorSparticus Jul 2016 #41
eppur_se_muova Jul 2016 #3
pinboy3niner Jul 2016 #6
LeftyMom Jul 2016 #4
grossproffit Jul 2016 #5
Warren DeMontague Jul 2016 #7
melman Jul 2016 #8
MADem Jul 2016 #14
heaven05 Jul 2016 #28
barbtries Jul 2016 #44
unc70 Jul 2016 #30
malaise Jul 2016 #9
Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #10
malaise Jul 2016 #13
awoke_in_2003 Jul 2016 #25
ZombieHorde Jul 2016 #45
kentauros Jul 2016 #46
oberliner Jul 2016 #15
MADem Jul 2016 #17
oberliner Jul 2016 #18
MADem Jul 2016 #19
oberliner Jul 2016 #20
MADem Jul 2016 #22
oberliner Jul 2016 #23
Donald Ian Rankin Jul 2016 #21
MADem Jul 2016 #24
heaven05 Jul 2016 #26
Motley13 Jul 2016 #27
rug Jul 2016 #29
Ilsa Jul 2016 #31
MADem Jul 2016 #32
Calculating Jul 2016 #33
Ilsa Jul 2016 #35
Calculating Jul 2016 #36
Ilsa Jul 2016 #37
gratuitous Jul 2016 #34
kimbutgar Jul 2016 #38
Initech Jul 2016 #40
TroyJackson Jul 2016 #43
Yupster Jul 2016 #47
Liberal_in_LA Jul 2016 #48

Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 03:39 AM

1. Gobsmacked is how I feel, reading that and seeing those images.

What kind of lunatic does that kind of shit?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 03:43 AM

2. Thank God he didn't get promoted from Trump's short list

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:56 AM

11. The kind that has nothing in his life to be proud of other than the color of his skin.

 


If he had ever done anything meaningful during his entire life, he couldn't possibly be like that.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #11)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:59 AM

12. I have to wonder "Who raised that child to be a man?"

They didn't do a very good job. Or maybe there was just no one there.

It's astounding, though--I can't imagine anyone going to such effort to disfigure oneself so horrifically in support of an idea, particularly such an odious idea.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #12)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 07:02 AM

16. Article said his criminal record goes back to 1988 when he was 7.

 

I'm guessing from the day he was born, the deck was stacked against him.

Anyhow, with tats like that, it was a foregone conclusion he's be spending his life in prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #12)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 11:45 AM

39. Yes

Those tattoos were not some drunken impulse. He has put a lot of time, thought, and effort into his hate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #12)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 02:36 PM

42. I think a lot of this sort of racism is something that is handed down from 1 generation tothenext

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #11)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 02:34 PM

41. Exactly this! ^^^^^^^^^^^^

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 04:02 AM

3. If only there had been some warning signs ... nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eppur_se_muova (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 04:09 AM

6. It's always the quiet, low-key ones from whom you never expect it. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 04:08 AM

4. What's the over/under on how many porn sites autofill if you put the word "interracial"

into his browser history?

I'm starting the line at 3.5

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 04:08 AM

5. That's the face of pure evil.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:05 AM

7. Well

One less Trump delegate for Cleveland, eh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:11 AM

8. It's a weird thing about the PNW

 

I used to live in Seattle and there were a lot of these shitbags there. You'd see them all the time at various bars or rock clubs.

I don't recall ever seeing any of them when I lived in Boston or NYC, but in Seattle there were a whole bunch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to melman (Reply #8)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 06:09 AM

14. The Pacific Northwest has a liberal veneer, but they have a foundational history of

racial hatred that is really shocking. Those haters you saw might just be an aftershock of all that.

A little history:

....From its earliest American outset, the Pacific Northwest was long meant to be a land for the white caste. “Whites Only” writ large.
Look at Oregon, for instance. As Walidah Imarisha of Portland State University’s Black Studies Department told me, “Oregon was founded as a state, as a territory, as a white homeland. Folks who answered that call wanted to build their perfect white society.” And not in the same vein of a three-fifths-clause South, where black Americans would be tolerated, if in servitude. Oregon would be different. While the state remained in the Union—and actually proved pivotal to Abraham Lincoln’s nomination on the Republican ticket—Oregon’s founders mentioned racial unity in the state's original documents. To wit, the 1850 Oregon Donation Land Act allowed free land to whites alone. And during an 1857 vote on the constitution’s formulation, some 83 percent of participants voted to prohibit “free negroes” from living or working in the state. Chief Justice George Williams, who later served as attorney general for President Ulysses Grant, summed the sentiment, lobbying voters to “consecrate Oregon to the use of the white man, and exclude the negro, Chinaman, and every race of that character.” According to one researcher, Oregon was “the only state ever admitted with a black exclusion clause in its constitution.” There’s a reason, growing up in Portland, that my seventh-grade teacher informed us Oregon was often considered the most racist state west of the Mississippi.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/northwest-front-americas-worst-racists-119803#ixzz4EfAXk4oW






Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #14)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:20 AM

28. always has been

 

"whites only". That's why these thugs get off so easy when apprehended as many times as this lowlife thug animal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to heaven05 (Reply #28)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:12 PM

44. as i started to read his criminal history

it was hard to believe he wasn't already in prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #14)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:22 AM

30. So was the Midwest - OH, IL, IN, ...

The "original" NW Territories were initially white only in their state constitutions. Free blacks were not allowed to move to these areas. In the early 1800s, a free black in NC was a full citizen in NC (including voting and jury service), but could not even move to states like IN, OH, and IL.

The division then was not between slave v free states but between slave and white-only states.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:17 AM

9. And he was taken alive???

Just asking!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #9)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 05:46 AM

10. He didn't want to get his silly pictures marked up. Thinks he's going to be a king in prison. . . nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #10)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 06:07 AM

13. LOL

Ok then

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #10)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:05 AM

25. As an aside...

 

the pictures are offensive, but that is some quality work. Too bad the tattoo artist is wasting talent on Nazi imagery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to awoke_in_2003 (Reply #25)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 11:44 PM

45. I was thinking the same thing. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to awoke_in_2003 (Reply #25)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 12:42 AM

46. Yes the quality is great.

Yet I would think for a tattoo artist to even make such imagery, they'd have to be a fellow believer. I can't think of any people I've known with tattoos asking for Nazi symbolism. And the one tattoo artist I've known never offered that kind of thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 06:10 AM

15. This article is from the British tabloid, Daily Mail

 

They basically take articles written by other sources and re-package them, sometimes without even crediting the folks who did the actual reporting.

Here's an article on this topic from an actual local news source that did some actual reporting on it:

http://www.columbian.com/news/2016/jul/16/suspect-in-woodland-area-shooting-had-trial-set-for-monday/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oberliner (Reply #15)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 07:17 AM

17. The Mail is very tabloid-y, but it is "accessible."

I wonder how many people they have on staff whose sole job it is to comb through regional and local papers looking for stuff they can lift?

They really are skilled at the "aggregation" game. They aren't much of a news source, but they do well at "content providing," if one remembers that they do have a bit of a rightwing bent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #17)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 07:24 AM

18. They seemed to have mastered the repackaging/aggregation game

 

And for some reason, they seem a really popular choice of source here at DU, which I don't really understand.

They have this pattern, especially with respect to US stories. They will grab reporting from a few other sources, along with numerous photos from other newspapers (or wire services) and use an attention-grabbing headline along with several bullet points at the top of their piece.

All of the information in the article, though, is compiled from actual reporting done by others.

it seems like for a local Washington state story, it would be good to use local Washington state sources.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oberliner (Reply #18)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 07:40 AM

19. I can tell you why they're liked here--their stuff is easy to copy.

They don't put barriers in the way of accessing their info--the pics are easy to grab, as is the content, and they helpfully provide the link back to the original source.

Those of us who use them on occasion know that they're wingnutty at times, but, as I said, they're accessible. So long as we know just what they are (and most of us do) it's the convenience.

They're also very good at repackaging foreign language material. That's handy for people who don't speak a foreign language and can't read the material in the original form.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #19)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 07:45 AM

20. Makes sense

 

Though I'm not sure that everyone is as aware of their right-wing slant as you are.

Also, that their front page is usually focused around how much skin various female celebrities are showing.

I am not a fan of giving them any clicks, but that is just me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oberliner (Reply #20)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 08:34 AM

22. LOL about the skin! They also like to talk about how "toned" and "taut" their abs are!

Of course, this is just for the women--I don't notice any males being praised for how "slim" they're looking, or how lovely their LEGS are! It's like a sad throwback to the dark ages, but I guess it sells papers. They also like to post pictures that are really unflattering, and then pretend to not notice (So-and-So looking fit in skimpy bikini when the poor thing looks tired, exhausted, in need of a break and is completely unaware that they're being photographed)--that way they get the clickbait fights (She looks HORRIBLE!! No she doesn't, she looks great!!!!) in their comments section, and that, of course, increases their ad revenue.

They do make a bundle on the whole body shaming culture, don't they?

You're not talking rocket scientists who read that thing, at any rate!

I will take note of their slant if I am citing a political article, but for the tabloid-y/lounge-type stuff, I sometimes don't bother.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #22)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 08:41 AM

23. Yes, indeed

 

I agree with all your observations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #17)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 08:26 AM

21. Never trust anything you read in a British tabloid. The Mail is excrement.

Legitimate British journalism takes place pretty exclusively in magazines and broadsheets. The tabloids are sometimes not wrong, but only by coincidence.

The Telegraph is a right-wing paper, but a respectable one with reasonably high standards of accuracy.

The Mail, Sun, Express, Mirror etc, by contrast, are hogwash.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Donald Ian Rankin (Reply #21)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 08:56 AM

24. They're not "hogwash." They're just aggregators. It's a lot of pop news.

They copied that story about the white supremacist accurately, and provided an accessible portal (clicks for ad revenue, no fees required) to access it.

Try getting an article from the Times of London and copying it here.
Not happening. They give you a teaser paragraph, but then you need to pony up the dough to see their content.

I wouldn't compare Newsweek or Time to People or Us, either. They're all magazines, but each has a particular audience and purpose.

I don't notice a lot of difference between the Mail and the Telegraph, really, save the Telegraph crew do less "entertainment/celebrity" type news. They still mock their opponents with cheap shots, e.g. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/17/labour-in-crisis-and-a-relaxed-jeremy-corbyn-plays-pokemon-go-in/


It is what it is--they're convenient, and they're not quite Fauxsnooze.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:15 AM

26. I get disgusted

 

how animal thugs like this can get away with using a weapon to intimidate an interacial couple, be arrested without being shot right away(white privilege) getting 90 fucking days of jail time and walk. This animal is representative of 99% of chumps for trump. If these thug animals take over, well.............america WILL become a battleground. They should not be tolerated, yet are. All that Odin shit is thug bullshit too. Yeh they belong in valhalla, every last goddamn one of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:19 AM

27. What a surprise, I NEVER wold have suspected him

His mom probably said, "impossible, he is such a good boy"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:21 AM

29. One less trump vote.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:28 AM

31. What is the word in large letters on the back of his shoulders?

I googled. Looks like it might be RAHOWA: Racial Holy War (RAHOWA, sometimes spelled as RaHoWa) is the belief that White people should unite and undertake a holy war against Jews and non-Whites. The concept was first put forward by Ben Klassen, founder of the Church of the Creator. Since the group's inception, the term has gained a significant amount of popularity within White nationalist terminologies.
This man is evil.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #31)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:36 AM

32. Thank you for taking the time to do that--I wondered, as well. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #31)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:44 AM

33. Good find

I was wondering what that was. The artwork is actually pretty well done, outside of the evil intent. I wonder what happens to somebody in life for them to turn out like this? Daddy left the family? Mommy left daddy to get with a black guy? Rape? Molestation? Or just born as a psycho?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Calculating (Reply #33)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 10:11 AM

35. I had to try various spellings since one letter was partially

obscured in all of the pics. My first two words took me to Middle East links!

I can't imagine how this happens. I guess his environment was awful growing up. But I can't discount the possible influence of DNA that probably had something to do with bad choices by his parents, and then him. I'm not certain, but I think I have been seeing more behaviour linking to DNA over the last few years. That, in and of itself, is a scary thought. We could open a whole can of worms in discussing the impact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #35)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 10:16 AM

36. Yeah, that's a very controversial thing

What if clear genetic tendencies to deviant/violent behavior were mapped out? What do we do with people who are known to have them?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Calculating (Reply #36)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 10:19 AM

37. And my thoughts had not even gotten to that point yet... nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #31)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 09:53 AM

34. Useful information

I wonder why, though, in spite of his fellow traveler's urging to die in a fiery shootout, the hero of the story surrendered peacefully? I guess he likes to fight only when the odds are heavily in his favor. Did he soil himself when the cops came, or just collapse in a blubbering heap?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 11:38 AM

38. One less vote for the cheeto

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 12:32 PM

40. That guy looks like a real winner!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Sun Jul 17, 2016, 02:48 PM

43. those tattoos look so scary

 

damn scary news

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 01:05 AM

47. Who's next to Hitler?

Looks like Rudolf Hess.

Do neo-Nazis like Rudolf Hess?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yupster (Reply #47)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 02:29 AM

48. Yes, looks like Hess

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread