General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOmaha suburbs complaining about potholes, city converts them to dirt roads. No money to fix roads.
Residents do not want to raise taxes to pay for roads. So dirt roads are what they get.
GOP cut taxes cut government spending. How is that working our for you?
http://www.klkntv.com/story/32770311/omahas-answer-to-pothole-complaints-a-new-dirt-road
deminks
(11,014 posts)I assume they will be dirt soon on their own. In Topeka. Same government story, maybe worse.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)They want services, services, services, but don't want to pay for them and don't seem to understand the connection. They'd vote down school bonds, road bonds, pretty much anything that would improve services and infrastructure, but would also raise taxes, even if the increase was minor. The people they elect to office have to pretty much promise to lower taxes at every opportunity to get elected.
Be careful what you wish for - you might just get it.
The funny thing is that there's a massive amount of money in Omaha - some of the wealthiest people in the country live there.
brush
(53,782 posts)or to yours if the dunces elect dunces who don't get that roads and infrastructure and all that has a cost taxes we all pay to maintain roads or we get dirt roads.
Third world status here we come.
imanamerican63
(13,798 posts)If they would not have spent the money for a new multi million dollar baseball stadium and a convention center? We would be fix the roads? We had a few mayors who sold out to big money & taxes are skyrocketing!
B Calm
(28,762 posts)they could have black topped it several times over.
Yavin4
(35,440 posts)Who wouldn't enjoy pushing your car out of the mud on your way to work in the morning. Think of it as a good workout.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)> Cough <
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Not like anybody visits Omaha
tanyev
(42,559 posts)Somehow, some way.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)If they want to live like this without the magnificent scenery, fine with me:
Clouseau2
(60 posts)I googled a bit and couldn't find the article, but I remember reading somewhere an article where the author had analyzed the cost of maintaining the roads in suburbs (more expensive than in urban areas due to lower population density) and determined that taxes were far too low to cover the costs.
His conclusion was that what's happening (I don't remember the logic he used to come to this) is tax money from newly built areas is being used to maintain existing roads. This will eventually collapse on itself and depends on ever more roads being built to keep everything from falling apart because people do not want to pay the taxes to maintain expensive suburb roads.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)As long as the suburbs keep expanding, it works, more or less.
However, to all things there comes a point of diminishing returns.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)one step at a time.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)new automobiles another plus too.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)hibbing
(10,098 posts)With our inherited money governor who is a colossal delta bravo.
Peace
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)First you dumb down public education.
Then you saturate the airwaves with the likes of Faux News, Limbaugh, and Beck.
Then you pitch snake oil about trickle down economics and how our taxes are too high.
And you end up with a citizenry that simply does not understand what taxes are used for. They somehow think (if they think about it at all) that gubmint is just 'taking their money'. They don't understand where the money to fix roads, fill potholes, hire cops and firefighters,drive snow plows, and the like comes from. And if you try and explain it to them they get hostile and figure you are some sort of lbrul effete jerk who just doesn't understand what it takes to make Murica Grate again.
And the assholes in the State Capitol are perfectly content with that.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)They've taken America back.
Right to the 30s.
Omaha Steve
(99,653 posts)These areas were built before being annexed years ago. They were rural and outside Omah's 3 mile zoning limit, beyond the city limits. The streets were substandard. No (they were blacktop) concrete, not wide enough, no proper sewer inlets, no curbs, etc.
Blame the contractor for substandard streets to keep the cost per home down.
OS
Omaha's answer to pothole complaints: a new dirt road: http://www.omaha.com/news/nation/omaha-s-answer-to-pothole-complaints-a-new-dirt-road/article_976e04fa-c35f-5027-9d4f-0475fdbc8d6f.html
citood
(550 posts)Omaha tax revenues are actually up.
This is a POLICY FAILURE.
The city allowed streets to be built by developers, which were not up to city standards. The city controls the right of way, and should have never allowed this. I have no doubt that the homeowners on these streets pay taxes - and in 2015 valuations and taxes EXCEEDED budget expectations. But they are now screwed, because they trusted a) the developer b) Their elected leaders.
http://www.omaha.com/news/metro/city-residents-at-a-crossroads-over-who-should-pay-to/article_ef906c08-83e6-505e-9636-e2736fe51f9f.html
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Initech
(100,079 posts)Absolutely nothing!
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)They are ranked in the top 100 counties in the nation in property taxes.