Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 02:01 PM Aug 2016

Omaha's Answer to Pothole Complaints: a New Dirt Road

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/omahas-answer-pothole-complaints-dirt-road-41421071

For miles and miles Omaha stretches on, one tidy, suburban-style neighborhood after another filled with modern low-slung houses set on spacious lawns with towering oaks and elms.

It's a model of comfortable mid-American living, with one unusual exception: thanks to a quirk in how Omaha developed, about 300 miles of streets in these nice neighborhoods are pitted with potholes almost big enough to swallow an SUV.

The bad roads have been both an anomaly and a source of complaints for years. But recently, they've become the center of a mini-crisis after local officials began dispatching crews to tear up the asphalt in the neighborhoods and turn the streets back into dirt roads, much like what existed in the city's frontier days.

The sudden appearance of miles of dirt road in the midst of urban Omaha has prompted angry protests by residents and showcased a conflict over the public services homeowners should expect when a modern city outgrows some of its old real estate agreements.

"No letter, no notice. We just came home on a Tuesday, and our street was ground up," said Joe Skradski, a dentist who lives on 113th Street, where a dozen $400,000-and-up houses now line a dirt path. "Since then, it's been nothing short of a nightmare."

Nearly every U.S. city faces a backlog of needed roadwork as streets built decades ago wear out, but the situation is especially vexing in Omaha, a sprawling city of 435,000 people with 4,800 miles of road and not enough tax revenue to maintain them.

Decades ago, a number of developers sought permission to lay down asphalt roads rather than longer-lasting concrete in several sections in the middle of town, and to skip installing curbs and gutters preferred by the city. The city agreed, with the understanding that homeowners be responsible for occasional repaving. Some substandard roads also were in areas once outside the city but that were later annexed.

For years, the arrangement held up. But as the roads began to age and crumble, and as new residents replaced the original homeowners, resentment intensified about a city government that maintained some neighborhoods while ignoring others.

Said neighbor Bill Manhart, "It's like living in the country, but in the middle of the city...There's so much dust and mud on the street, what's the point?"

A series of meeting between city officials and residents of the affected neighborhoods, which include about 10,000 houses, hasn't resolved the problem.

...............................

According to urban planners, the dispute is a case study in how short-term deals that cities make about seemingly minor issues can backfire when the cities and circumstances change.

Dan Piatkowski, an assistant professor of regional planning at the University of Nebraska, said the dispute is also forcing residents to think about what they get from government. This is especially useful, he said, in a conservative state like Nebraska that is skeptical of government spending.

Many conservatives believe "smaller government is better, but we still want our roads to function," he said.


———
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Omaha's Answer to Pothole Complaints: a New Dirt Road (Original Post) ErikJ Aug 2016 OP
The government should spend money to help ME!!!! The Velveteen Ocelot Aug 2016 #1
They could always raise taxes gratuitous Aug 2016 #2
NE property taxes are already very high whatthehey Aug 2016 #6
IOW, conservatives get what they asked for and now they don't like it. Warpy Aug 2016 #3
Tax the rich. Iggo Aug 2016 #4
Red State Blues......No taxes, no services. yellowcanine Aug 2016 #5

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. They could always raise taxes
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 02:28 PM
Aug 2016

But these taxophobic kooks never see any connection between the stuff they want from government and paying taxes to support it. Dirt roads in Nebraska are going to be especially nice come winter and spring, when they've congealed into icy, muddy messes. But what is the City supposed to do? Conjure decent roads out of thin air?

Maybe this connection between taxes and services will finally penetrate a few Cornhusker skulls.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
6. NE property taxes are already very high
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 03:58 PM
Aug 2016

They (Douglas) are on the bottom of page 3 of 28 in this ranked pdf

http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/proptax10_home_value_0.pdf

Having lived in quite a few on the following 25 pages (and a couple higher up) I can reliably confirm none had dirt roads in middle class close suburbs.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
3. IOW, conservatives get what they asked for and now they don't like it.
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 03:41 PM
Aug 2016

Funny, up in Santa Fe and Taos, the richest people are at the end of the worst dirt roads. It's sort of a rich man's cachet here, a form of going back to the Wild West. Mud season is interesting, if you don't have your vehicle parked on grass or a hard surface when the mud dries out, you'll need a jackhammer to free it.

I suppose all those people in their McMansions will go through one mud season next spring, taxes will be voted up a tick, and the roads will be repaved.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Omaha's Answer to Pothole...