Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cyrano

(15,041 posts)
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:33 PM Aug 2016

Lochte et al: Nullify their Olympic medals

The IOCC needs to "take away" the Olympic medals won by Lochte and his idiot friends who were all in on the lie of being robbed at gunpoint.

The American woman who stopped in the middle of a race to help a New Zealand woman, after both had fallen, showed the true meaning of (what is supposedly) the Olympic spirit.

Lochte and the other Americans with him have stained that Olympic spirit.

Brazil is far from being a wealthy country, yet , they've done everything possible to put on a good Olympics that would make them proud. (This is the first Olympics to be held in South America.) World class assholes like Lochte and his fellow team mates, in their lies, have spit on a country striving for recognition and respect.

In turning their drunken recklessness into a supposed robbery at gun point, they have pulled attention away from all the competitors who spent their young lives working towards a seemingly impossible dream. And they have taken a huge dump on Brazil's efforts to make this Olympics safe and something in which they could take pride.

Screw Lochte. Screw his fellow lying turds. They don't deserve the medals they are wearing. Those medals should be declared null and void. I don't know if the IOCC can do that, but they should do whatever it is in their power to do to highlight these disgusting competitors. Even if it's just an asterisk next to their names in the record books, -- asterisks that will forever be seen as a stain on their names.

84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lochte et al: Nullify their Olympic medals (Original Post) Cyrano Aug 2016 OP
They are shitheads, but they won the medals before this incident. Dumb shitheads at that. tonyt53 Aug 2016 #1
You get a medal for winning the event, not for being a model human being jberryhill Aug 2016 #2
Then it's time to stop all the Cyrano Aug 2016 #6
Because for the most part it does. B2G Aug 2016 #16
Anything involving humans involves humans jberryhill Aug 2016 #20
You should have figgured out nobody cares when they allowed hope solo to compete Travis_0004 Aug 2016 #59
You would think he killed someone. Sheesh. yeoman6987 Aug 2016 #61
5,000 athletes from every place in the world and we should cancel it because of FSogol Aug 2016 #82
Just did a spittake citood Aug 2016 #3
Not gonna happen... this is just silly. n/t demmiblue Aug 2016 #4
Their stupid, unethical behavior was Ilsa Aug 2016 #5
At least they won't go through life Cyrano Aug 2016 #10
Yes, at least for the first decade. Ilsa Aug 2016 #34
Questionable character LoverOfLiberty Aug 2016 #71
No way SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #7
And all the mockery they get for this stupidity mythology Aug 2016 #8
Agreed n/t SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #11
Silly post nt Dreamer Tatum Aug 2016 #9
Silly reply Cyrano Aug 2016 #12
Why not take away my medals, then? nt Dreamer Tatum Aug 2016 #13
Ok, please return one DUzy award to Grovelbot. JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2016 #31
Nope, excellent reply. HERVEPA Aug 2016 #77
So Olympians who didn't win medals get to run wild and be shit heads? NightWatcher Aug 2016 #14
1968 - Olympic protestors stripped of their medals Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #15
Thanks, Buckeye_Dem. That's the point I'm trying to make. Cyrano Aug 2016 #18
That involved behavior actually conducted in the program jberryhill Aug 2016 #21
So I assume you think stripping those athletes of their medals B2G Aug 2016 #23
Precedent does not make it right. nt B2G Aug 2016 #19
It's not even relevant "precedent" jberryhill Aug 2016 #22
Putting your fist in the air with your head down isn't vandalism. Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #26
Who said it was? jberryhill Aug 2016 #35
Nope, I just assumed that you thought the 1968 event was vandalism. Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #39
I never said that. Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #24
And that decision was a travesty. hack89 Aug 2016 #37
Sorry, but History Channel is WRONG and unreliable. DinahMoeHum Aug 2016 #40
THANK YOU! I apologize for sharing it! It's outrageous... Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #43
You're welcome. Let's also consider who the IOC head was at that time. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2016 #46
Medals should only be taken away for actual cheating in the event, Nye Bevan Aug 2016 #17
What are the usual penalties the IOC imposes? backscatter712 Aug 2016 #25
Methinks the jurisdiction here is with USA Swimming. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2016 #47
Seems fair. Right now, we've got the Internet Lynch Mob frothing at the mouth. backscatter712 Aug 2016 #49
Yep SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #50
LOL OBenario Aug 2016 #56
Nothing to do with my ego SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #62
Oh, another xenophobic remark... OBenario Aug 2016 #68
Nope, I don't reallly follow swimming SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #74
I see... OBenario Aug 2016 #80
Sure you can SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #83
Not a problem. OBenario Aug 2016 #84
I know you want to hit back, but it's not likely to happen Warpy Aug 2016 #27
You seem to have put it in perspective, Warpy Cyrano Aug 2016 #30
Um, no oberliner Aug 2016 #28
IF they had done it before they won the medals, I would go along with this. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #29
Unrelated, if there was some type of doping for the event then it would be in violation of the rules Thinkingabout Aug 2016 #32
Irony alert SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #33
There was no extortion. OBenario Aug 2016 #36
You need to keep up SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #41
I see. Thought they were still deciding about that. OBenario Aug 2016 #42
It's extortion, plain and simple SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #45
Nope, it isn't. OBenario Aug 2016 #51
If extortion's your game SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #54
Look, pal... OBenario Aug 2016 #55
Nope, no one is special and above the law SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #63
Calling Brazilians "corrupt" is XENOPHOBIC. OBenario Aug 2016 #67
Thats ridiculous jcgoldie Aug 2016 #64
Do you really believe the U.S SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2016 #66
They committed a crime jcgoldie Aug 2016 #72
Has there been a trail sarisataka Aug 2016 #52
The public prosecutor offered an agreement. OBenario Aug 2016 #53
Thank you sarisataka Aug 2016 #58
That's ridiculous. Philly-Union-Man Aug 2016 #38
Does that mean Phelps also has to give up a gold medal for the relay? mentalsolstice Aug 2016 #44
He's a complete ass. cwydro Aug 2016 #48
Thank you Cyrano saidsimplesimon Aug 2016 #57
sorry - not going to happen - nor should it DrDan Aug 2016 #60
Simply not going to happen. roamer65 Aug 2016 #65
They all ran good clean races. The IOC is not in the business of judging Takket Aug 2016 #69
He will get to keep his medals. tavernier Aug 2016 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author AgadorSparticus Aug 2016 #73
I'd have him pay taxes on the income/medals and fines for the vandalism first. HereSince1628 Aug 2016 #75
They should be treated as poor examples of decent Americans. Probably show up standing behind Trump. Hoyt Aug 2016 #76
Lochte won a gold medal, but since it was as part of relay, are you suggesting that all four LisaL Aug 2016 #78
Lol... No. Adrahil Aug 2016 #79
NO. medals should never be taken away for anything other than cheating in the event Amishman Aug 2016 #81
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. You get a medal for winning the event, not for being a model human being
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:37 PM
Aug 2016

The Moral Olympics are next year.

Cyrano

(15,041 posts)
6. Then it's time to stop all the
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:42 PM
Aug 2016

bullshit about how the Olympics represents the best in human beings.

It's an implied and sometimes spoken concept. Given these assholes, why would anyone buy into it?

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
16. Because for the most part it does.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:00 PM
Aug 2016

But hey, go ahead and let a few bad apples color you perception of all of the athletes.

I mean, it wouldn't be wrong to generalize like that, would it?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
20. Anything involving humans involves humans
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:03 PM
Aug 2016

In the event you didn't notice, there were more than four people involved in the Olympics.

I guess I don't understand what I'm being asked to "buy into", just to watch a bunch of sports, but whatevs.

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
82. 5,000 athletes from every place in the world and we should cancel it because of
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 10:50 AM
Aug 2016

one stupid frat boy and his friends?

Why focus on the negative?

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
5. Their stupid, unethical behavior was
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:42 PM
Aug 2016

Unrelated to their swimming performance. I doubt they'll lose their medals.

And I doubt they'll get lucrative endorsement contracts, too.

Cyrano

(15,041 posts)
10. At least they won't go through life
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:48 PM
Aug 2016

bragging about their Olympic medals.

They will constantly have to worry about someone bringing up all of what they did in Rio.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
34. Yes, at least for the first decade.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:35 PM
Aug 2016

I can get past the drunkeness, but the valdalism, fight, then lies, and the nature of the lies - to embarass the host city - are indicative of poor judgment and questionable character. I hope they are ashamed of themselves.

LoverOfLiberty

(1,438 posts)
71. Questionable character
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 11:36 PM
Aug 2016

from those who have been given so much and have supposedly learned self discipline.

Shame, really.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
14. So Olympians who didn't win medals get to run wild and be shit heads?
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:53 PM
Aug 2016

If the penalty is loss of a medal, maybe they could rob a souvenir stand or mug a local.

But Nightwatcher, those two things (medals and misdemeanors) are unrelated.

Uh huh.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,855 posts)
15. 1968 - Olympic protestors stripped of their medals
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:55 PM
Aug 2016
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/olympic-protestors-stripped-of-their-medals
On October 17, 1968, Olympic gold medalist Tommie Smith and bronze medalist John Carlos are forced to return their awards because they raised their fists in a black-power salute during the medal ceremony.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
21. That involved behavior actually conducted in the program
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:05 PM
Aug 2016

Aside from being a wrong decision which has long been criticized in the first place, I guess what we are going to have to do is to assign each medal-winning athlete a minder to follow them around for a sufficient period in order to make sure they don't do something untoward.
 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
23. So I assume you think stripping those athletes of their medals
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:06 PM
Aug 2016

was the right thing to do. So the swimmers should have theirs taken away too. For consistency sake.

Do I have your point right?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
22. It's not even relevant "precedent"
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:06 PM
Aug 2016

If Lochte et. al. had vandalized the podium during the ceremony, that would be relevant.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
35. Who said it was?
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:35 PM
Aug 2016


The poster was claiming that (a) the revocation of medals for behavior during the Olympics themselves was "precedent" for (b) revocation of medals based on behavior having nothing to do with the conduct of the Olympics.

Lochte et al. vandalized a gas station nowhere near the Olympics, and not during conduct of any Olympic event or ceremony.

This is not a comparison of "putting your fist in the air" and "vandalism". It was a response to the notion that "conduct during an event or ceremony" has anything to do with "conduct occurring elsewhere on their own time" somehow renders one to establish some kind of "precedent" for the other.

I'm going to assume you simply didn't read the thread.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,855 posts)
39. Nope, I just assumed that you thought the 1968 event was vandalism.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:44 PM
Aug 2016

You clarified it. Thanks.

I honestly don't care what happens to Lochte's medals either way, but I disagree with your assessment that the precedent isn't applicable. That's your line of reasoning, but someone else could use a line of reasoning based on which act was more damaging.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,855 posts)
24. I never said that.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:09 PM
Aug 2016

It's just an example of it happening in the past, so it wouldn't be without precedent if it did happen.

I personally don't care very much either way. I watched about a grand total of 15 minutes of the Olympics this year, by far the least of my entire life except for baby and preschool years.

DinahMoeHum

(21,794 posts)
40. Sorry, but History Channel is WRONG and unreliable.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:48 PM
Aug 2016
Smith and Carlos were NOT stripped of their medals
They were kicked off the US team, kicked out of the Olympic Village and kicked out of Mexico for their protest.

They are still listed as medal winners in ALL Olympic accounts. Unless they had been caught cheating (using performance enhancing drugs, etc) the IOC would have had no jurisdiction whatsoever to strip them of their medals.

John Carlos's website:
http://www.johncarlos68.com/


Buckeye_Democrat

(14,855 posts)
43. THANK YOU! I apologize for sharing it! It's outrageous...
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:59 PM
Aug 2016

... that History Channel got it so wrong!! It was also one of the first links when I Googled past revocations of medals.

Here's an old NYT article that supports your claim:
http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/1018.html

Ruby said today he had tried to arrange a meeting with the two athletes, but had been rebuffed. No attempt will be made to deprive them of their medals, he added, because "we have no right to take away their medals."


In that case, there may not be a precedent? Other than cheating in the events?

DinahMoeHum

(21,794 posts)
46. You're welcome. Let's also consider who the IOC head was at that time. . .
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:15 PM
Aug 2016

. . .Avery Brundage, formerly head of the AOC/USOC, and an out-and-out racist/anti-Semitic pig and fascist sympathizer.

Plenty of dirt about that guy that can be easily looked up in books and the internet.


Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
17. Medals should only be taken away for actual cheating in the event,
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:00 PM
Aug 2016

like taking PEDs for example. Lochte may be a jerk but he won his medals fair and square.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
25. What are the usual penalties the IOC imposes?
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:10 PM
Aug 2016

I'm assuming they include fines, and being kicked off the US Olympic team.

Also, just remember, Lochte's lost millions of dollars in endorsement deals. He's not getting his pic on boxes of Wheaties anymore...

DinahMoeHum

(21,794 posts)
47. Methinks the jurisdiction here is with USA Swimming. . .
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:21 PM
Aug 2016

. . .and the USOC. Not the IOC.

USA Swimming issued a statement the other day, but it's a safe bet that they are considering some kind of sanctions against Lochte and co.
My guess is that the swimmers involved will face fines and suspensions from the USA team.

http://www.usaswimming.org

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
49. Seems fair. Right now, we've got the Internet Lynch Mob frothing at the mouth.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:38 PM
Aug 2016

Realistically, we're talking about low-level drunken douchebaggery. Fines and suspensions, along with paying reparations to that gas station for the damage they've caused, seems like a fair punishment.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
50. Yep
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:42 PM
Aug 2016

Plus, I'm curious as to what's on the 3 or so minutes of missing video. The swimmers were drunken assholes for vandalizing the bathroom, no doubt, but given that Brazil extorted $11,000 from one swimmer just to get out of the damned country, I'm wondering if they were in fact robbed at gunpoint by the security guards.

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
56. LOL
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 06:07 PM
Aug 2016

The four of them said they weren't robbed. But... believe in the fairy tales that are more appropriated for your American ego as you want.

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
68. Oh, another xenophobic remark...
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 11:12 PM
Aug 2016

It must hurt a lot for you to be acting as such a baby.

Were you the president of Locthe's official fan club?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
74. Nope, I don't reallly follow swimming
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 06:03 AM
Aug 2016

And how is it xenophobic to state a recognized fact, i.e., that Brazil is a very corrupt country? It's not like that's a secret.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
83. Sure you can
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 11:26 AM
Aug 2016

But with Brazil's murder rate standing at more than six times that of the U.S., it would be pretty laughable to do so.

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
84. Not a problem.
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 10:06 PM
Aug 2016

Add the millions US has killed in its eternal wars to steal oil, resources, etc. and we're done.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
27. I know you want to hit back, but it's not likely to happen
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:12 PM
Aug 2016

My guess is that the overgrown teenager is persona non grata in Brazil for the rest of his life.

If he doesn't find a reason to grow up soon, he's going to wind up in jail. Thirtysomething teenagers usually do.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
32. Unrelated, if there was some type of doping for the event then it would be in violation of the rules
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:31 PM
Aug 2016

This was separate. In case of auto accident clearly the responsibility is placed on the other party and if you are cited hours later for speeding then it should not reverse the responsibility in the earlier accident.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
33. Irony alert
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:31 PM
Aug 2016

"World class assholes like Lochte and his fellow team mates, in their lies, have spit on a country striving for recognition and respect." (bolding added by me)

Yeah, nothing inspires recognition and respect like extortion.

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
36. There was no extortion.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:40 PM
Aug 2016

The babies tried to leave the gas station after what they did, were stopped by security, BEGGED the gas station staff no to call the police and offered to pay COMPENSATION FOR THE DAMAGES they caused.

The gas staff accepted in order to help them saving their butts.

They probably didn't realize the guy was such an idiot he would tell that fairy tale of macho-man, guns in his head, thieves disguised of police to international press and his mommy...

Oh, I doubt the money they accepted to handle really will pay for the damages. It won't cover a single door.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
41. You need to keep up
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:50 PM
Aug 2016
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-rio-summer-olympics/jimmy-feigen-u-s-swimmer-lochte-scandal-pays-leave-rio-n634201

One of the swimmers had to "donate" $11,000 to a charity in order to get his passport back and get the hell out of Brazil.

That's extortion.

The swimmers were absolutely wrong to do what they did and then lie about it, but fuck Brazil.
 

OBenario

(604 posts)
42. I see. Thought they were still deciding about that.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:59 PM
Aug 2016

But, yes, it's either fine or three years in jail for reporting false crimes.

It's not extortion, it's called law.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
45. It's extortion, plain and simple
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:14 PM
Aug 2016

Not surprising for Brazil, but I would think they would want to act a little out of character when the whole world is watching.

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
51. Nope, it isn't.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:48 PM
Aug 2016

I'm pretty sure that if I destroy private property in the US I have to pay damages, fine or going to jail as well.

Unless you consider yourselves as "exceptional", which, of course, is ridiculous.

We are receiving a lot of messages of support from around the world after this incident. People are horrified by the lies of the US Olympic team.

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
55. Look, pal...
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 06:06 PM
Aug 2016

... I know your mamma, TV, media, etc. told you that you are special and above laws.

But that's stupid and means nothing outside your borders.

Your 30s year old babies vandalized a gas station, tried to evade the scene and made a false communication of crime to media. That's not enough?

And you are here "but, but, but... punishing our babies is extortion, oh my god, they are victims". Please... it's pathetic...

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
64. Thats ridiculous
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 10:54 PM
Aug 2016

They committed a crime and then agreed to pay to avoid charges. In the United States thats called a plea bargain not "extortion".

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
66. Do you really believe the U.S
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 10:59 PM
Aug 2016

would hold someone's passport and extort $11,000 for false reporting of a crime?

No question, I would have paid the money too, rather than try to take on the corrupt criminal justice system in Brazil, but that doesn't change the fact that they extorted money.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
72. They committed a crime
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 11:39 PM
Aug 2016

And made an ass of themselves. This has nothing to do with Brazil's criminal justice system. It has to do with asshole entitled American athletes.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
52. Has there been a trail
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:53 PM
Aug 2016

Or is it not needed if there was an admission of filing a false report?
(serious question. Many assume laws are the same world wide. I know basic laws is several countries but not Brazil)

 

OBenario

(604 posts)
53. The public prosecutor offered an agreement.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:59 PM
Aug 2016

In Brazil, before presenting charges and going to trial, the accused has the right, according to the offense, to reach a deal. Pay a fine or compensation and the charges are dismissed, as long as it has been the 1st offense.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
58. Thank you
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 06:10 PM
Aug 2016

That sheds another beam of light.

I am reserving judgement still however I also understand local laws apply, not US law. What might be considered "unfair" here is perfectly legal in other countries and vice versa.

 

Philly-Union-Man

(79 posts)
38. That's ridiculous.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 04:44 PM
Aug 2016

They won them in fair competition. You don't have to be a smart guy or a nice guy to physically beat someone in a race or in a ring.


No, this is an absurd suggestion.

mentalsolstice

(4,461 posts)
44. Does that mean Phelps also has to give up a gold medal for the relay?
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:13 PM
Aug 2016

Lochte's gold medal came from being a part of the 4x200 metre freestyle relay. By your reasoning, all who were on that team should be disqualified. So, no I'm sorry but your proposition is pure bullshit!

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
48. He's a complete ass.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 05:26 PM
Aug 2016

At 32, he set a very poor example for the 20 year olds he was hanging with. Pathetic.

But no, he won the medal.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
57. Thank you Cyrano
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 06:08 PM
Aug 2016

Facts are everyone's friend. As an American, I am both disappointed and appalled that a few taint the accomplishments of our fellow citizens.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
65. Simply not going to happen.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 10:57 PM
Aug 2016

With Michael Phelps' infractions, the IOC came out and said it is not their jurisdiction. If any sanctions happen, it will be from USA Swimming. They were the ones who suspended Phelps for his DUI.
USA Swimming does not have the power to remove Olympic titles.

Takket

(21,577 posts)
69. They all ran good clean races. The IOC is not in the business of judging
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 11:12 PM
Aug 2016

athlete's moral character outside of the sport(s). Nor should it be.

tavernier

(12,392 posts)
70. He will get to keep his medals.
Fri Aug 19, 2016, 11:23 PM
Aug 2016

But he'll lose millions in sponsorships.

Since swimming doesn't provide a lot of future lucrative opportunities such as other sports might, he pretty much was counting on these Olympics to make hay. That's gone now. Pretty stiff price to pay for one drunken night.

I don't think the others will be judged so severely.

Response to Cyrano (Original post)

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
75. I'd have him pay taxes on the income/medals and fines for the vandalism first.
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 07:23 AM
Aug 2016

Why should we as taxpayers lose out?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
76. They should be treated as poor examples of decent Americans. Probably show up standing behind Trump.
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 09:19 AM
Aug 2016

They'll be appreciated by that crowd as Olympic medal winners, but mostly as publicly trashing a South American country.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
78. Lochte won a gold medal, but since it was as part of relay, are you suggesting that all four
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 09:31 AM
Aug 2016

athletes should lose medals?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
79. Lol... No.
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 09:40 AM
Aug 2016

And an olympics to be proud of? It was a shit show.

They couldn't keep the pools from turning green FFS.

Yes, I know they are a poor nation. Don't host an Olympics, which costs billions and billions, then!

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
81. NO. medals should never be taken away for anything other than cheating in the event
Sat Aug 20, 2016, 10:42 AM
Aug 2016

the Olympics is supposed to rise above politics. Taking away medals for anything that did not impact the outcome of the event would shit all over that concept.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lochte et al: Nullify the...