General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNBC’s $12 Billion Olympics Bet Stumbles, Thanks to Millennials
Back in June, Steve Burke described what he called his Olympics nightmare.
We wake up someday and the ratings are down 20 percent, the chief executive officer of NBCUniversal said at a conference. If that happens, my prediction would be that millennials had been in a Facebook bubble or a Snapchat bubble and the Olympics have come, and they didnt know it.
He has escaped that with the Rio games this year -- but not by much. Prime-time broadcast viewership has been down about 17 percent compared to the London games four years ago. And in the 18-to-49-year-old age group coveted by advertisers, its been even worse. That audience has been 25 percent smaller, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
The Summer Olympics ratings slip, the first since 2000, raises fresh doubts about what used to be a sure thing: live sports would be a huge and growing draw no matter what. Thats why NBC parent Comcast Corp. paid $12 billion for exclusive U.S. broadcast rights to the Olympics through 2032. Others, including Walt Disney Co.s ESPN, 21st Century Fox Inc., Time Warner Inc. and CBS Corp., have made long-term bets on football, baseball and basketball.
To be sure, many sporting events are as big as ever. The Super Bowl in February pulled in 112 million viewers, making it the third most-watched event in TV history. On the other hand, Villanovas victory over North Carolina in the mens college basketball championship drew 37 percent fewer viewers than last years title game, though that may have had something to do with the fact that, for the first time, the match-up was on a cable channel, not a broadcast network.
MORE...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-19/nbc-s-12-billion-olympics-bet-stumbles-thanks-to-millennials
lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)They deserve much better than what they got.
But this whole thing was managed poorly on many levels.
MattP
(3,304 posts)Not to mention the sewage, after the run up it just didn't give off a good vibe
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)that one of the boats ran into triggered such an adverse reaction in me I watched less than I ever have.
<snip>
ut there is nothing new here: every four years we get our knickers in a twist about the same subject. The Olympics has become sports quadrennial call to ordure, and few modern Games have passed without at least flirting with filth.
In the run-up to 2012 the Times reported that waterways around Londons Stratford site (the Olympic stadium stands less than a mile from the Abbey Mills Pumping Station, the celebrated Cathedral of Sewage designed by Joseph Bazalgette) look and smell more like a shanty towns open sewer than the promised 21st-century eco-park. Organisers proposed a lengthy tunnel to take foul fluids elsewhere, the only problem with that idea being that it would have taken £2bn and 15 years to construct. Instead a new pumping station was built, and rapidly recycled refuse was repurposed to flush the parks toilets and water its gardens.
Four years earlier Beijing had renovated nearly 400 miles of sewage pipes to avoid embarrassment. In 2000 a 20km tunnel was built to carry overflows away from the hitherto filthsome Sydney Harbour, and organisers also had to battle a sewage-like whiff that drifted over the main stadium during a test event, eventually traced to a nearby mangrove swamp that emitted a naturally occurring odour of nauseating intensity.
In Atlanta 20 years ago the local government issued bonds to finance the repair of a creaking, antiquated sewage system and still didnt do it on time, leading to scare stories about infected tap water. Four years earlier Barcelona built a new sewage plant just in time to clean up its beach, scientists the previous year having found large amounts of flotsam, including condoms and solid faecal matter in the area to be used for the Olympic sailing.
-----------------------
I'm betting the water was better than that in Flint Michigan
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,855 posts)And in the 18-to-49-year-old age group coveted by advertisers, its been even worse. That audience has been 25 percent smaller, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
I've barely watched any of it this time. I consider it nationalistic fluff.
madamesilverspurs
(15,805 posts)it's the lousy choppy coverage. Just plain horrible this go round.
.
MattP
(3,304 posts)trof
(54,256 posts)Most people in the U.S. don't give a rat's ass about the Olympics any more.
I don't.
Nobody I know does.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)...and the army of copyright nazis blocking viewers from using the Internet to find alternatives, no wonder it turned out to be a shitshow.
It's the fucking Olympics. It should be free for all to watch. Fuck the networks and their exclusivity deals.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)And excessive advertising is even worse.
msongs
(67,420 posts)maryellen99
(3,789 posts)Looking forward to the next winter and summer ones which will be in Asia and seeing the big events early in the morning.
Initech
(100,081 posts)I swear every time it's basketball or volleyball. 3 channels and that's all they have to cover. You know why the ratings are down? Show other sports!
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)women's beach volleyball? Shouldn't we stop pretending and just call it bikini volleyball?
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Putting women's gymnastics on at 11 p.m.? The men's gymnastics was barely mentioned even though Danell Leyva took two silvers and Alex Naddour won a bronze.
There was way too much swimming the first week.
I am enjoying the track and field a little more this week.
NBC seemed more interested in showing their hosts having a grand time in Rio than covering the events.
Auggie
(31,173 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Better coverage could have certainly helped.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Not into sports much and jingoism mixed with sports is even less appetizing.
brush
(53,788 posts)The first week was hour upon hour upon hour of swimmers you can hardly see going bad and forth and bad and forth in the pool.
Too much blanket coverage of that gets boring.
The gymnastics was great and visual and not boring, volley ball was good and thank God track and field finally started where you can see the visually exciting events and appreciate the athletes' skills.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)NBC only shows American athletes, they don't show the more commercially profitable sports, often their announcers know nothing about the sports they are covering. Even the sports that Americans medalled in, they only showed the American performances and not their competition.
I used to watch the equestrian events every year. Somewhere I still have BETA tapes of the 1980, 1984 and 1988 Olympic equestrian events.
When NBC took over, most of the events that had previously been shown on broadcast TV were on pay per view satellite channels back when that meant the big dishes. A friend with a large satellite dish paid for the Olympics so she could tape the equestrian events - I think the Olympics were in Korea that year so the times were in the middle of the night here. Since she had to work full time, taping was the only way she could watch the events she wanted to see. Not once during that Olympics were the equestrian events shown at the times on the schedule she was supplied. She eventually got NBC to refund her money by getting her lawyer to threaten to sue.
The last two summer Olympics I have not even checked the schedule to see if any equestrian events were being shown. So little is shown on NBC, it's not worth the time. To see the events I am interested in, I'll wait a few months and find them on DVD or stream them on the internet.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Yes, the primetime coverage on NBC is very USA oriented in what sports are covered and which athletes. Most of it is on tape delay.
That said, the coverage on the affiliate channels has been excellent. Lots of international sports and athletes covered. I really can't complain.