General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe president of the Iowa Federation of Republican Women is stepping down because she opposes Donald
https://twitter.com/jasonnobleDMR/status/786199317581209600
https://melissagesing.wordpress.com/2016/10/11/ending-this-bad-and-unhealthy-relationship/
malaise
(268,966 posts)<snip>
We stand behind the Republican ticket!
ALEXANDRIA, Va. As the elected spokesperson of the most influential group of Republican women in the United States, I reaffirm the National Federation of Republican Women's unified support of Republican Presidential Nominee Donald J. Trump and Vice Presidential Nominee Mike Pence. We stand behind the Republican ticket, and we will continue to work day and night to defend our Constitution, uphold our conservative principles, and elect our GOP candidates," NFRW President Carrie Almond stated today.
---------------------------
You support sexual assault and rape culture. Go Cheney yourself!!
longship
(40,416 posts)We've got a rather glaring Dunning-Kruger Effect going on here.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)The Republicans are demonstrating clearly the falsity of what was claimed by many Dems and allies here a few months ago and is being loudly asserted by Trump supporters currently.
No the fervent agitators and "outsider" partisans who call themselves, incorrectly, the base cannot carry an election. The people who do the boring and thankless admin and organizing campaign stuff, the dreaded insiders and "establishment", are necessary and vital. All the zealotry in the world cannot make up for organizational savvy and exprerience. Don't get me wrong, we need both, and they need both. The difference is we have both to a great degree, with the few sad Busters massively outnumbered by enthusiastic Dem partisan volunteers. They are losing too many of the insiders, the real tribal knowledge and veteran people who know how to run elections, so they are losing the election, which could have been very winnable with a traditional R candidate supported by a unified party machine.
This is not about Bernie Sanders by the way, and not even about most of his supporters. Sanders would not have been Trump. Not only is he far less objectionable to the apathetic apolitical, but he is, despite many claims mostly made by others, a political insider. A couple of decades in Congress even as an independent give you a store of knowledge and contacts and "ropes" that Trump will never get close to even if he tries. Most of his supporters knew this, and thought it would be great to get some more dynamic policy priorities and some energizing of new voters in more ways than one. A few though bought a bit too much into this new/different/outsider/revolution/fuck the establishment image that the Republicans are actually trying, with predictably cataclysmic results.
I'd have liked to have seen a Sanders presidency. I would not have liked to have seen the presidential campaign imagined not by Sanders himself, who has doubtless forgotten more about politics than I'll ever know, but by some of his more wild-eyed supporters. I think savvy Republicans are getting that pretty clearly right now.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Because for those of us outside the Repub establishment, none of what he's done is all that surprising to us. His attitude toward women is exactly the same as most Republicans - he's just way more open about it. Maybe some of these Republican women refusing to support him will wake up to the signs that even the "mainstream" Republican men show.
rurallib
(62,411 posts)the repub party is all in for Trump. So if she continues to work for Grassley or the congress candidates or even in most local races she is still supporting Trump's ideas.