General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet’s remember the time Donald Trump cashed a 13¢ check sent to him as a prank
http://fusion.net/story/170645/donald-trump-check-prank-spy/Published between 1986 and 1998, Spy magazine was the hip, satirical, bomb-throwing magazine du jour, and in 1990 the writers had a great idea for a prank: What would happen if you sent checks for small amounts to celebrities and saw who cashed them, putting to test the theory that every man (and woman) has a price? In their words:
We could however, send them checks for minuscule sums of moneysums so small they couldnt fund as much as a minute of the recipients existenceand see who would bother to bank these teensy amounts of money.
Spy thought some subterfuge would be necessaryitd be suspicious to get a check from the magazine that lampooned so many of the intended recipients. This was specifically true for Trump, who Spy once famously referred to as a short-fingered vulgarian.
So, they created a fully funded and incorporated company called National Refund Clearinghouse, which allowed them to open a checking account. Then they drafted a letter explaining that the check was a refund for a small overcharge that had occurred in 1988what the celebrities had been overcharged for was never mentioned. They sent the checks out (initially for $1.11) to 58 well-known people like Cher, Henry Kissinger, and, of course, Donald Trump. Of the 58, 26 cashed the checksDonald included.
The magazine drafted a followup letter and checks for $0.64 to those 26 people to see who would take more free money. Thirteenincluding Donald Trumpdeposited the checks worth two quarters, a dime, and four pennies into their banks.
Then they went for one last score: in honor of those 13 people, 13 more checks for $0.13. Two people cashed them: a Saudi arms dealer named Adnan Khashoggi, and Donald Trump."
MH1
(17,600 posts)Business organizations have "people" who do that. Why would it matter the amount, just put it in the pile for the next trip to the bank.
I despise Trump as much as anyone, but don't see anything revealing in this.
treestar
(82,383 posts)a lot of people would crash it out of consideration that the sending party can keep their books balanced.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)It was a settlement in some class action suit I had no idea I was part of, and it cost more than that to send me that check, and by "cash" I mean deposited it electronically. I got more than $0.67 worth of amusement showing the check to friends, and whoever sent it got their books balanced. (and someone got paid to stick the check in an envelope, which was probably the only human intervention in the whole process)
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)It was my portion on a class action suit I didn't know I was part of. But I figured why not?
I am sure this just went in a pile of deposits in the business office, and not Donald going to the bank. This is a "nothing scandal".