General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmalaise
(269,237 posts)Thank You
elleng
(131,247 posts)Thanks, major debacle! Something to do tonight!
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Thanks.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)manicraven
(901 posts)I actually choked up during part of it. LOVED it!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But he has enough money, so fuck it, let's steal his work.
And fuck everyone involved whose pay depends on paid viewers.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He was depressing the vote. Making plenty off of doing that, too. Went on television shows, and talked up THIS shit:
http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/
Now that she's scored a triple KO in the debates on the orange asshole, he's suddenly on the Hill Train. He's late to the fair and I really don't feel sorry for him. He's making money off of Clinton's hard work with his slapped-together "film," after he spent no small amount of time screeching that the sky is falling and HRC was toast. I think his ex may have had a point.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)So it's okay to steal his work?
It's okay to fuck everyone and anyone who is getting paid based on sales?
Fuck the theater owners who booked a movie that's free on YouTube?
Can we go into Trump Tower and break stuff?
This is theft.
YouTube will probably have it down pretty quickly
MADem
(135,425 posts)I watched it--it's about worth what I paid for it.
It is a full-throated, let-me-on-the-bandwagon, defense/endorsement of HRC, though it takes a long while to get to that point. It has a dash of snark, a dash of kumbaya, and no small measure of detachment.
It's up to YT to take it down--for all we know, it's posted with his permission. I believe he's put other films up on YT.
JI7
(89,281 posts)interest in it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Some of it is compelling, some of it is kind of boring, some is just irritating. It takes a while for him to get warmed up.
For people who like him, and like his storytelling style, they'll enjoy it. For those who have made up their mind and intend to vote for HRC, well, watch the last half and you'll get the best bits, IMO.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)But apparently since he suppprted Bernie that makes it ok to do.
The mental twister of justification being played is amusing to read.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Your claims are baseless.
MADem
(135,425 posts)all parties, as well as a slice of Republican/Trump voters. It's a cross between "do your duty and make history" and "hold your nose and vote" type exercise.
My claim isn't baseless--I actually watched the thing. It starts out very slow, and about half way through it starts to gel.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Presumably this place isn't the target audience anyway.
brush
(53,932 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)with his high profile especially. You tube will take down anything copyrighted. In fact I added a song I bought to an iMovie and it got taken down.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That music was automatically detected by a system specifically set up to recognize the music from a database set up and designed for that purpose. This sort of thing has to be done manually.
Someone went through a lot of trouble to get this uploaded to YouTube and put on social media like DU in the hope that it will economically harm Moore and everyone else involved in the film revenue stream. And they are laughing about it right now.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)I'll wait and pay for it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)He says he wants everyone to see it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Promotional screenings are normal.
But you are fine with him signing to book the movie for paid showings, and then fuck the theater owners by giving it away on YouTube.
This YouTube user also has a full episode of South Park. I guess he's got a deal with Comedy Central too. Ummmm.... no.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I am not going to presume or characterize someone I don't know, but I can't stop you from doing that. For all you or I know, he posted that with permission.
If you google the title, all you get is information about FREE showings all over the country....as for the theater, who pays them? Moore? The DNC? The HRC campaign? Who? Or maybe they donate their space?
"Promotional" showings only work before a wide release. This ain't Star Wars. It has an expiration date, and that date in 9 November. This is too short for a real movie, too. This is a ONE HOUR and ELEVEN minute political ad of sorts. THAT's why he's offering it for free--it's an opinion and he wants to stay relevant in the "opining" field. He's seeding that field in anticipation of future documentaries for which he can charge, on the lines of Columbine and others.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think it's entirely possible that Moore himself wanted to put it out there.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I'd advise the theater owners who booked the film to sue him if he did that.
I do not find the user account "Tamarind Curry Coconut Sauce" to likely be authorized to post this film or to post a full episode of South Park.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Another problem with giving it away for free is that it has a defined value.
If it is, as said here, an extended pitch for Hillary, and thus an in-kind campaign contribution?
Or is Citizens United okay when it's among friends?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I guess after that you drink it all up.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Dr. Strange
(25,927 posts)Which is what led to the second CU case. Based on those, I'm sure Moore's latest film is safe, even if it is an extended pitch for Hillary.
hlthe2b
(102,457 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I've seen bands put singles out for free and also have them on itunes for a charge. Doesn't mean they weren't okay with both.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)This is not at all like a band giving away a song for free.
Moore's distributor signed contracts with independent theaters - small community businesses - to show this film.
...and then turned around and fucked them.
That's the alternative hypothesis.
And that's why the same account also has a full episode of South Park posted?
Yeah, right.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)another hill I'm not sure I want to die on. If you say so, I'll take your word for it.
Still, it seems to me it's hard to make both arguments at the same time: "Don't rip off MM by watching this for free" and "MM is an ass for charging 4 bucks on itunes for it". One or the other, maybe.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm more the Wavy Gravy type, myself.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)All things being equal, you then are unable to imagine more than two hypotheses in the scenario? Are these two (and only two) hypotheses predicated on mere assumption, or objective evidence you'll allows us?
I'm going with "you're simply guessing..."
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)handmade34
(22,759 posts)AmericanActivist
(1,019 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I mean seriously. Fuck Michael Moore charging $4.99 to watch on iTunes.
ScienceIsGood
(314 posts)Cha
(297,877 posts)home!
Thank you, major!
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Wow! Thanks so much!
bushalert
(200 posts)teach1st
(5,935 posts)It was a a great film.
I fully intend to pay for it, but not at the Apple Store.
Johnny2X2X
(19,237 posts)Where is the memorial for the 1,000,000 Americans who have died because they don't have health care since Hillary first tried to introduce Universal Health Care in 1996. They'd be alive if we had listened to her.
And it's emotional because he's right, we all know someone who has died or has gotten really sick because they couldn't afford care. My wife's father died because he couldn't afford treatments for espophigial cancer, he was sent him from the hospital to die after he and his wife had sold everything they had and went another $60,000 in debt to try to save him. He died knowing that everything he worked for had been sold and the security he had tried to provide for his wife was gone.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)And, to anyone who pissed and moaned about it being on iTunes for 5 bux, Shut. UP.
AwakeAtLast
(14,134 posts)Thanks!
doc03
(35,407 posts)a couple months ago? Maybe not a hater but a rabid Sanders supporter.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...different from being a Hillary hater. You can believe someone else has views closer to your own and will be a better president while not hating the other candidate. As many Clinton voters here had no animosity towards Bernie, and many Bernie voters had no animosity towards Clinton, however deeply attached they were to Bernie/Clinton.
We tend to forget, given what we saw from those with fiercer feelings ("I'll never vote for Hillary!" and given how we all feel about Trump, who has made himself quite hateful, that it isn't really common to "hate" the other candidate...just to not want them for president (or whatever they're running for).
doc03
(35,407 posts)hell did he do the show about Hillary and who the hell would he be voting for?
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)Did you watch it? He voted for Obama in 2008 and was for Bernie this year. Bernie and Obama were, he thought, more in line with his politics than Hillary. In the film, this becomes important as he asks Trump voters and independents in the audience why they're not voting for her. He wants them to talk to him about it, and they're more more willing to do so when he reminds them that he didn't vote for her in the last election or primary.
But he is now a stanch Hillary supporter. A convert, it you like, who is now sincerely, genuinely, fervently for her, and has made this film to cheer her on and try to convert more voters. You seem upset that he wasn't always in her corner. Why? I think it's good that he's honest about his voting record. It allows him to go through his conversion to Hillary--from doubter to believer--and bring the audience (some of whom are doubters) along with him. He wouldn't be able to do that if he had always been a Hillary supporter and voter.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)into destroying people who oppose them and so little energy in helping people who elected them
Hillary really is tough as nails and she is going to make one badass President because as she walked through the valley of the shadow of death, she not only feared no evil, she kicked ass and took names.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)Glad, though, that I can listen on Youtube at 1.5 speed. Probably could have set it at 2, but would not want to miss anything.
LostinRed
(840 posts)Not only because I agree it is stolen content but also it is boring. And not funny. Does it get better? I'll watch it if it goes up on Netflix or amazon prime.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)hoping ten minutes in it gets better.
So worthwhile
Gets better and better.
it was just too painful
MADem
(135,425 posts)I can, though, think of better ways for a Democrat to spend their time.
elmac
(4,642 posts)love his logic about HRC having her Pope moment, makes perfect sense.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)THANK YOU!!!!!!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)kentuck
(111,110 posts)He spoke very well of the Millennials.
Thought-provoking.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Once she is elected and finally 'free' to govern like a president, we Americans will see a very positive side-the best of Hillary
lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)I saw how long it was, and thought that maybe I'd watch a minute or two ... well, here I am at 2:00 am, after having watched the entire thing. I thought it was pretty great. Don't know what I expected, but I was very pleasantly surprised.
I thought I saw a change in the audience. Did anyone else?
Good job, Michael Moore. No, EXCELLENT job!
Warpy
(111,404 posts)He's seen the same rage I have that is making otherwise nice people want to elect a wrecking ball in the hope he'll knock over the system that has fucked them over for 40+ years. Hell, during that part of the video, I almost wanted to vote for a wrecking ball, too, just not a dimwit like Trump.
However, we've got Clinton and we can survive Clinton. I doubt we can survive a narcissistic madman like Trump.
So i'll be voting for Hillary Clinton this week.
SamKnause
(13,111 posts)It was excellent !!!
I think he changed the minds of some of the people in the audience.
hlthe2b
(102,457 posts)I just find it hard to believe most Trump supporters would have been willing to pay admission to see Michael Moore....
major debacle
(508 posts)Not sure if that was the total number in attendance, or if some paid
EDIT: After checking, it appears that the 400 free tickets I referred to were given out for the premier of the movie in New York City, not for Michael Moore's performance in Wilmington, Ohio upon which the movie was based. After some brief searching I have not yet found out how the attendees to his live performance were selected or whether they were charged.
SamKnause
(13,111 posts)stated the tickets were free.
OregonBlue
(7,755 posts)Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)Thanks for posting.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)tavernier
(12,410 posts)Thanks!
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)and the 2nd half is excellent. I bet he convinced 4 or 5 Trump supporters or leaners. If that is 3% of his supporters, who watch this, that could be tens of thousands of votes by election day. I feel like sending the link to certain people I know. lol
ScienceIsGood
(314 posts)Stuart G
(38,454 posts)Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)Old Vet
(2,001 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)IMO, changed them for the better just with a couple small 'humanizing' facts. It will be interesting to see how that small town votes now. They may always be a 'republican' town, IMO many more will vote for Hillary instead of Trump.
mnhtnbb
(31,410 posts)What a masterful performance. Well done.
LeftInTX
(25,667 posts)Will it get taken down?
Good news, it will reach people who aren't willing to pay for it on itunes. Hope it stays up until the election. It can sway some voters. Especially young adults.