Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dakota Access Pipeline (Original Post) burrowowl Oct 2016 OP
thank you for the information niyad Oct 2016 #1
K&R!! 2naSalit Oct 2016 #2
at least 2 protestors opened fire during teh protest rdking647 Oct 2016 #3
Thanks for link! burrowowl Oct 2016 #4
now, if only we could believe the powers that be. after all, they have been sooooo niyad Oct 2016 #5
there appears to be video where the gunfire can be heard rdking647 Oct 2016 #6
hearing gunfire is not proof of who is shooting, now, is it? niyad Oct 2016 #7
the protestors have also set fires and are on private land rdking647 Oct 2016 #8
Good Post! burrowowl Oct 2016 #9
Go here! burrowowl Oct 2016 #10

niyad

(113,294 posts)
5. now, if only we could believe the powers that be. after all, they have been sooooo
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:24 PM
Oct 2016

truthful thus far.

 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
8. the protestors have also set fires and are on private land
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:46 PM
Oct 2016

north dakota is a castle doctrine state
if the landowner wanted to he could legally use force himself to remove the protestors


under the law

12.1-05-06. Use of force in defense of premises and property.
Force is justified if it is used to prevent or terminate an unlawful entry or other trespass in or
upon premises, or to prevent an unlawful carrying away or damaging of property, if the person
using such force first requests the person against whom such force is to be used to desist from
his interference with the premises or property, except that a request is not necessary if it would
be useless or dangerous to make the request or substantial damage would be done to the
property sought to be protected before the request could effectively be made.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dakota Access Pipeline