Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud liberal 80

(4,167 posts)
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 08:53 AM Oct 2016

Supreme Court

IF somehow trump wins the presidency and the Dems take the senate shouldn't the Dems do what the republicans did to obama and what they plan to do to Clinton and stall. Hell, what would they have to lose?

And even if the Dems dont have a majority in the senate, should t they force the republicans to use the nuclear option.

Forget about principle and rules. The republicans never play by them. Why is it that the Dems always have to be the responsible ones and take the higher road.

I bet you if the roles were reversed this year, the Dems would have caved and confirmed a republican president's nominee.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court (Original Post) Proud liberal 80 Oct 2016 OP
You can't fight stupid with stupid. Xipe Totec Oct 2016 #1
You are correct Proud liberal 80 Oct 2016 #3
No. metroins Oct 2016 #2
Won't happen Proud liberal 80 Oct 2016 #4
Won't happen. TrishaJ Oct 2016 #5

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
1. You can't fight stupid with stupid.
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 08:57 AM
Oct 2016

The difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Democrats make decisions based on the merits and for the good of the country. Republicans make decisions based on brand loyalty and for the good of the party.

Proud liberal 80

(4,167 posts)
3. You are correct
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 09:00 AM
Oct 2016

They are playing a different game than us and they know it.

It was evident when we had a supermajority in the senate or close to one and still couldn't do shit. But when they had a simple majority they still were able to get everything they wanted.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
2. No.
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 08:58 AM
Oct 2016

We should try to get moderates appointed.

Honestly, the politics of the courts is wrong and the divide on it is wrong. We should have moderate judges who interpret law and don't interject beliefs.

I think Merrick Garland was a great choice and if Trump won we should try to get moderates.

TrishaJ

(798 posts)
5. Won't happen.
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 09:48 AM
Oct 2016

They should have done it to George W. Bush* when he was installed in 2000. Oh wait..... 9-11!
Funny how that changed the mindset.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court