Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNorth Carolina Is Engaging in “Insane” Jim Crow–Style Voter Suppression, Says Federal Judge
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/11/03/federal_judge_slams_north_carolina_voter_purge.htmlU.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs slammed an ongoing North Carolinian voter purge during a dramatic Wednesday hearing, telling county attorneys that she was horrified by the insane process by which voters could be removed from the rolls without their knowledge. It almost looks like a cattle call, the way people are being purged, Biggs said. This sounds like something that was put together in 1901, when the state used Jim Crow laws to prevent black citizens from casting a ballot.
Biggs called a hearing after the NAACP sued several North Carolina counties for purging nearly 6,700 votersmost of them black Democratsfrom the rolls. These purges were legal under a state law that permits any person to revoke any other persons voting rights. The process is simple: An individual gathers mail that was returned as undeliverable, then challenges the voter registration of residents at those addresses. If those voters do not appear at a county board of elections or return a notarized form, their voting rights are nullified.
In several North Carolina counties, Republican activists have used this process to revoke thousands of peoples voting rights at once, a majority of them minorities. But as the Justice Department noted in supporting the NAACPs lawsuit, this process is illegal under federal law, which trumps state law when the two clash. Biggs indicated that she would halt the purges and restore purged voters rights under federal law but did not issue a ruling from the bench. Her decision is likely to come within the next few days.
..more..
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 663 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina Is Engaging in “Insane” Jim Crow–Style Voter Suppression, Says Federal Judge (Original Post)
G_j
Nov 2016
OP
Projection. He accuses the other side of things he does himself -- loads and loads of things.
ColemanMaskell
Nov 2016
#4
Encouraging that the judge is planning to restore the purged voters. Hope she does it quickly.
ColemanMaskell
Nov 2016
#2
world wide wally
(21,742 posts)1. Has Trump ever been asked "which side is rigging the election"?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)3. Exactly what I want to know
If HRC loses NC, it sounds like SHE should contest the results.
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)4. Projection. He accuses the other side of things he does himself -- loads and loads of things.
Mexican rapists ring a bell? He does this all the time. Any accusation he comes out with, it's a good bet that he's talking about something he did himself. Traditionally expressed in vernacular as "whoever smelt it dealt it".
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)2. Encouraging that the judge is planning to restore the purged voters. Hope she does it quickly.
Thank you for posting that.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)5. JAIL: " this process is illegal under federal law, which trumps state law when the two clash."