Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:06 AM Nov 2016

What's the deal with the Clinton maid printing out emails story?

"Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials"
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/

It certainly sounds bad taken at face value, but almost no news outlets have picked it up.

Of course the right is going bananas over it.


My question is-- is it just completely bogus, or is there some element of truth to it? Is there a debunking on it somewhere?

Overall, it sounds kind of hard to believe. My guess is it's disinfo put out by some FBI agents, similar to the wild stories put out during the Clinton WH years.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's the deal with the Clinton maid printing out emails story? (Original Post) Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 OP
NY Post underpants Nov 2016 #2
Here you go underpants Nov 2016 #3
From Media Matters teach1st Nov 2016 #4
thanks! I figured it was something like that Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #9
They had problems with the state Department printer grantcart Nov 2016 #5
I remember reading that times & places of meetings would get a small c for "confidential," Demit Nov 2016 #8
it's freaking insane how so many in the media can't seem to report basic things like that Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #11
You are exactly right. I never saw it again. Demit Nov 2016 #13
I'm sick of this shit, it's the forking Post!! Foggyhill Nov 2016 #6
well, to be clear, the specific accusation is that her maid printed classified emails Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #12
You should tell them to frack off Foggyhill Nov 2016 #15
Let me know when this is going to help my taxes HipChick Nov 2016 #7
Not classified LynnTTT Nov 2016 #10
right... yes. It's also possible the Marina in the emails is someone else, not the maid Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #14

teach1st

(5,935 posts)
4. From Media Matters
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:11 AM
Nov 2016

The accusation comes from a NY Post article. Here's part of a response.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/11/06/conservatives-run-ny-post-story-about-maid-printing-clintons-emails-botch-classification-history/214345

Confidential Emails Were Classified After The Fact And Originated From Clinton Aide. Neither of the two classified emails referenced by the New York Post were sent by Clinton, and Clinton did not make any request for Santos to print either email. Both emails were classified years after the fact -- one in October 2015, and another in January 2016 -- at the lowest level of classification, “confidential.” The sole case the Post cited of Clinton asking for a message to be printed was not classified. [U.S. Department Of State, 10/30/15; 1/29/16]

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
9. thanks! I figured it was something like that
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:58 AM
Nov 2016

It's so freaking irresponsible how the email scandal has been reported

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
5. They had problems with the state Department printer
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:20 AM
Nov 2016

And had then printed at home.

I believe there were 8 confidential emails that were printed and they weren't classified at the time.

More to the point is the classification "confidential'. When I was in the UN and was on the daily circulation list (1980s) of US States Department teletype, everything was Confidental, including items from the front page of the newspaper. Nothing at the real level of classification Secret or Top Secret were in the emails.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
8. I remember reading that times & places of meetings would get a small c for "confidential,"
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:37 AM
Nov 2016

then once the meetings took place there wasn't any reason for the info to be classified, which makes perfect sense.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
11. it's freaking insane how so many in the media can't seem to report basic things like that
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:00 AM
Nov 2016

I guess they'd rather print inflammatory scandalous crap than point out basic facts.

Foggyhill

(1,060 posts)
6. I'm sick of this shit, it's the forking Post!!
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 08:22 AM
Nov 2016

Also printing fracking email is not illegal

I want the fracking media to focus on actual things that actually matters

The fact that right wing narrative are polluting the internet and even this dite tells how far gone USA is and how close to a manufacture scandal gift wrapping the presidency to whatever fucker created it we are

God sake Trump had a anti Semite national commercial and we have to read about this crap


Clinton has been vetted 1000timed more than anyone in history



 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
12. well, to be clear, the specific accusation is that her maid printed classified emails
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:02 AM
Nov 2016

Last edited Mon Nov 7, 2016, 12:39 PM - Edit history (1)

when she didn't have clearance.

I know it's bogus, I just want a rebuttal to use against people who post this story.

Foggyhill

(1,060 posts)
15. You should tell them to frack off
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:21 AM
Nov 2016

They're just throlling you

If you hear email, assume dishonest motivation

Btw, there was no classified header email on her server, thats the fact

Only someone who already distrust her, maybe you, would to this well repeatedly, assume the worst




LynnTTT

(362 posts)
10. Not classified
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:00 AM
Nov 2016

at the time. But actually, how do we know she doesn't have some kind of security clearance. Every high level official has household help. Don't we have maids, cleaners, chefs, flower arrangers, etc going in and out of the White House all the time?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
14. right... yes. It's also possible the Marina in the emails is someone else, not the maid
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 09:04 AM
Nov 2016

The real red flags in the story are the lack of balance, the lack of any possible exculpatory facts, and the overall accusatory tone

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's the deal with the ...