General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat's the deal with the Clinton maid printing out emails story?
"Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials"
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/
It certainly sounds bad taken at face value, but almost no news outlets have picked it up.
Of course the right is going bananas over it.
My question is-- is it just completely bogus, or is there some element of truth to it? Is there a debunking on it somewhere?
Overall, it sounds kind of hard to believe. My guess is it's disinfo put out by some FBI agents, similar to the wild stories put out during the Clinton WH years.
underpants
(182,953 posts)That explains a lot of this
underpants
(182,953 posts)teach1st
(5,935 posts)The accusation comes from a NY Post article. Here's part of a response.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/11/06/conservatives-run-ny-post-story-about-maid-printing-clintons-emails-botch-classification-history/214345
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)It's so freaking irresponsible how the email scandal has been reported
grantcart
(53,061 posts)And had then printed at home.
I believe there were 8 confidential emails that were printed and they weren't classified at the time.
More to the point is the classification "confidential'. When I was in the UN and was on the daily circulation list (1980s) of US States Department teletype, everything was Confidental, including items from the front page of the newspaper. Nothing at the real level of classification Secret or Top Secret were in the emails.
Demit
(11,238 posts)then once the meetings took place there wasn't any reason for the info to be classified, which makes perfect sense.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)I guess they'd rather print inflammatory scandalous crap than point out basic facts.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)Also printing fracking email is not illegal
I want the fracking media to focus on actual things that actually matters
The fact that right wing narrative are polluting the internet and even this dite tells how far gone USA is and how close to a manufacture scandal gift wrapping the presidency to whatever fucker created it we are
God sake Trump had a anti Semite national commercial and we have to read about this crap
Clinton has been vetted 1000timed more than anyone in history
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 7, 2016, 12:39 PM - Edit history (1)
when she didn't have clearance.
I know it's bogus, I just want a rebuttal to use against people who post this story.
Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)They're just throlling you
If you hear email, assume dishonest motivation
Btw, there was no classified header email on her server, thats the fact
Only someone who already distrust her, maybe you, would to this well repeatedly, assume the worst
HipChick
(25,485 posts)until then, enough with the freaking emails...do not care
LynnTTT
(362 posts)at the time. But actually, how do we know she doesn't have some kind of security clearance. Every high level official has household help. Don't we have maids, cleaners, chefs, flower arrangers, etc going in and out of the White House all the time?
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)The real red flags in the story are the lack of balance, the lack of any possible exculpatory facts, and the overall accusatory tone