Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
Sun Nov 27, 2016, 10:30 AM Nov 2016

Who would of though that the eligible non-voting segment (larger number than voters) will save us

from ourselves.

This is the group who really dislike the Congress and think all politics is a game but don't try to take away programs they need and like.

They also know how to use the net and media to effect change and how push buttons.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who would of though that the eligible non-voting segment (larger number than voters) will save us (Original Post) CK_John Nov 2016 OP
? doc03 Nov 2016 #1
Yes, half of eligible voters didn't vote in this election. We should worry less about the fools that Trust Buster Nov 2016 #2
While I don't agree with the folks who sat out the election, cyndensco Nov 2016 #3
And I'm merely saying that the non-voters have more potential to our cause than the Trump voters. Trust Buster Nov 2016 #4
 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
2. Yes, half of eligible voters didn't vote in this election. We should worry less about the fools that
Sun Nov 27, 2016, 10:41 AM
Nov 2016

voted for Trump and more about those who couldn't be bothered.

cyndensco

(1,697 posts)
3. While I don't agree with the folks who sat out the election,
Sun Nov 27, 2016, 11:03 AM
Nov 2016

I think those who voted for trump are WAY more dangerous. I worry about them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who would of though that ...