General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill President Trump Cut Medicare And Social Security As Well As Taxes?
In the wake of Tuesdays election results, budget deficit hawks might seem as out of fashion as smartly tailored pants suits. After all, President-elect Donald J. Trump has proposed cutting taxes by $6.2 trillion over the next decade (with 47% of that cut going to the richest 1%), while promising to spend more on the military and veterans, plus an extra $500 billion to rebuild the nations roads, bridges, airports and other infrastructure. Oh, and he hasnt exactly said how (or if) hed pay for all those goodies.
In a paper published days before the election, Steuerle and coauthors from the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget calculated that if Trump pushes through his promised tax cuts, 100% of all additional federal revenue coming in from economic growth over the next decade will be consumed by increased interest payments for the federal debt and automatic increases in Social Security and health care spending. And thats even after assuming the two big spending cuts Trump has endorsed a House Republican plan to cut Medicaid spending by $500 billion over a decade by turning it into a capped block grant payment to the states and the penny a year plan, which requires that all non-defense, discretionary spending be cut 1% a year in nominal terms, saving $750 billion over a decade (without, conveniently, spelling out which programs would get chopped).
So where does President-elect Trump stand on cuts to entitlements, other than the Medicaid cap he embraced during the campaignthe one thats already built into Steuerles grim numbers? During the campaign, Trump promised to protect Social Security without cutting benefits, raising taxes, or raising the retirement age, suggesting a long term funding shortfallstarting in 2035, the tax dollars coming in will be enough to pay only 77% of benefitscould be solved simply by goosing the economy and cutting waste, fraud and abuse. Similarly, when it comes to Medicare, Trump has promised to protect benefits, but has offered no real ideas for curbing the growth of costs, other than allowing the program to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies,which Republicans have traditionally opposed.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetnovack/2016/11/10/will-president-trump-cut-medicare-and-social-security-as-well-as-taxes/#6563fb5ba43f
Trump and the Republicans are acting like Obama never excited and are just going into a third term of Bush after democrats fixed the last mess, to bad Americans are so uninformed and vote wedge issues instead of the big picture. Watching Fox News Corp is Dangerous to your health!
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Tom Leppert, the former mayor of Dallas who, it was announced Monday, is a member of Donald Trump's "landing team" for the Social Security Administration, once released a plan calling for the privatization of Social Security and Medicare.
"We're gonna save your Social Security without making any cuts. Mark my words," Trump said in February.
But archived versions of Leppert's plans from his 2012 Senate run show how diametrically different his views are from Trump's on the issue.
"I will never shy away from any issue, even the so-called 'third rail' of entitlement reform," Lippert writes in his 2012 plan. "Talk to any young person today, and they will tell you Social Security and Medicare won't be there for their generation. To preserve these vital programs, we first and foremost must not change anything for those ages 55 and older. These folks rely on their benefits and we've made a promise to them. But for younger workers, we need to provide Medicare subsidies for the purchase of certified private plans, raise the retirement age, encourage greater retirement savings, and launch an initiative of Personal Retirement Accounts to allow every American, not just the wealthy, to save and invest toward their retirement. Make no mistakeif we don't act now, these programs will go bankrupt. The simple fact in this debate is that people who oppose reform are the ones who want to destroy our entitlement system."
"This would be gradually phased-in over time and would not affect anyone currently over the age of 55," he wrote. "For younger individuals, when they reach retirement, they will receive a subsidy from the federal government that will allow them to purchase certified coverage plans. Those with the lowest incomes would receive more funds from vouchers and would be eligible for additional Medicaid coverage."
http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/21/news/economy/kfile-trump-social-security/
Its coming folks, get ready for Bushes Entitlement Cuts, on the table in the first 100 days. Do you trust these guys, I dont but voters have spoke or stayed home!
no_hypocrisy
(46,088 posts)longevity will only be reserved for the rich.