General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's not over. The pipeline fight goes on.
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161204005090/en/
...
The struggle goes on.
niyad
(113,302 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)Some background:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028150362
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/environment/tribes-celebrate-as-corps-rejects-dakota-access-pipeline-easement/
I dont feel less needed, said Peterson, who, like others, said he was concerned the victory could melt away if the company drilled anyway. There is also concern that President-elect Trump an investor in the project could seek to push the pipeline through once he takes office.
Many opponents who have been dubbed water protectors said they still dont want to leave the camp as long as the company has equipment at its drill pad and police continue to block the highway that accesses the construction site.
~~~
I hope everyone can just go home; its real, he said of the victory. Its not a hoax. Of course what is on everyones mind is what happens in seven weeks (when Trump takes office), and that is a legitimate question.
Indeed, Rep. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., the states only congressman and a longtime Trump supporter and someone Trump is said to be considering for Energy Secretary issued a statement Sunday promising a turnaround.
2naSalit
(86,608 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)Trump is all about confusing people and the press with purposeful misdirection and bombast. Past and current actions and statements by his inner circle and appointees are more telling of the direction he is taking.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/01/america-can-double-its-oil-production-says-fracking-pioneer-harold-hamm.html
The billionaire oilman and energy advisor to President-elect Donald Trump acknowledged the difficulty of such a renewed boom in oil production.
"We could take it from 10 [million barrels a day] to 20 [million]. The key here is not to get too much production coming back in oversupply the market or prices collapse and that's not a good deal for everybody," Hamm told CNBC's "Squawk on the Street."
"We have that potential in this country. That's what's available here. It needs to be done in a very systematic way," he said.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/01/trump-should-pick-rep-kevin-cramer-as-energy-secretary-over-me-harold-hamm-says.html
Hamm, an energy adviser to Trump, has long been seen as a candidate for the position, but he has repeatedly said he already has a full-time job running Continental Resources. The company made its name proving crude oil could be profitably extracted from shale rock in North Dakota using advanced drilling methods.
Cramer has said Hamm should have the right of first refusal for Energy secretary, but Hamm told CNBC that Cramer is the man for the job.
"Kevin's a great guy, and he would be a perfect candidate, as well. I've put his name forward," Hamm said on "Squawk on the Street." "He'd sort of do a better job in that post than me."
2naSalit
(86,608 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)Found this in a quick search.
Warning: both what Cramer is saying and the Fox graphics are enough to make blood boil.
"Imposed sovereignty" ?!?
https://m.
ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)While it was an enormous victory--the fight is t over and many of the water protectors k is this--and they aren't leaving