Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

still_one

(92,190 posts) Sat Dec 10, 2016, 02:20 PM Dec 2016

Trump is appointing people to the agencies these people hate, and that is why everyone of them

should be rejected by the Democrats

Let the republicans fully own this disaster

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump is appointing people to the agencies these people hate, and that is why everyone of them (Original Post) still_one Dec 2016 OP

Absolutly right. Let them fully own this disaster--that they are making! CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2016 #1

Full vetting and warnings about what may happen exboyfil Dec 2016 #2

What happens if key permanent State Department employees exboyfil Dec 2016 #3

They are being appointed to destroy these agencies. eppur_se_muova Dec 2016 #4

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,620 posts)

1. Absolutly right. Let them fully own this disaster--that they are making!

Reply to still_one (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 02:23 PM

Dec 2016

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)

2. Full vetting and warnings about what may happen

Reply to still_one (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 02:23 PM

Dec 2016

Then an up or down vote on the record.

Hopefully someone keeps score.

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)

3. What happens if key permanent State Department employees

Reply to still_one (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 02:25 PM

Dec 2016

decide it is time to hang it up?

eppur_se_muova

(36,262 posts)

4. They are being appointed to destroy these agencies.

Reply to still_one (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 02:27 PM

Dec 2016

Republicans have always wanted to destroy liberal democratic gov't; now they have the ability to do it directly, instead of indirectly by piecemeal legislation.

Reply to this discussion