Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts) Sun Dec 11, 2016, 02:16 PM Dec 2016

Chances Are Good That Trump Is Going To Get Troops Killed.

Trump will end up being such a screw up that he will actually get some of our military needlessly killed. We could end up back in the Middle East in a big way. He cabinet picks signal a very aggressive and confrontive foreign interventionist policy. His lack of knowledge could create a huge military blunder.

The fact that he has access to the nuclear codes has to be really worrisome. After all he asked why we can use that option. And we do have portable low yield battlefield nukes like artillery and short range missiles most likely.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chances Are Good That Trump Is Going To Get Troops Killed. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Dec 2016 OP

Chances are good MFM008 Dec 2016 #1

I Know But I Am Afraid To Mention It. TheMastersNemesis Dec 2016 #2

Are we going to get to parade the pictures exboyfil Dec 2016 #3

MFM008

(19,806 posts)

1. Chances are good

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Sun Dec 11, 2016, 02:18 PM

Dec 2016

He's going to get us all killed.

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)

2. I Know But I Am Afraid To Mention It.

Reply to MFM008 (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 11, 2016, 02:20 PM

Dec 2016

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)

3. Are we going to get to parade the pictures

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Sun Dec 11, 2016, 02:25 PM

Dec 2016

of them around like the Republicans did for four plus years like some modern bloody shirt or Jenkin's ear or will class and decorum return to the debate.

Reply to this discussion