Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Initech

(100,104 posts)
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:17 PM Dec 2016

NYT: Twitter Is Within Right To Suspend @realDonaldTrump, But Shouldn't

If Twitter wanted to, it would be well within its rights to suspend Donald J. Trump’s account.

After the president-elect used Twitter last week to criticize Chuck Jones, an Indiana union leader who represents workers at the Carrier company, Mr. Jones reported receiving a series of threatening phone calls from Mr. Trump’s supporters. Similarly, last year, Mr. Trump used Twitter to attack a college student who asked him a critical question at a rally; The Washington Post reported that the woman has been barraged by obscene and deranged threats ever since.

As a corporation, Twitter is under no First Amendment obligation to let Mr. Trump use the service. It gets to make its own set of speech rules within its own walls, and among those rules is a prohibition on using the service to incite harassment. Earlier this year, the company suspended several Trump supporters who appeared to run afoul of those rules. Twitter has said that its policies apply to every user.

And yet Twitter is in no position, now, to suspend @realDonaldTrump.

If you look closely at Mr. Trump’s Twitter messages, he has appeared to tack just inside the lines of the service’s rules of conduct. More than that, free speech advocates argue that Twitter’s policies ought to give great deference to political figures. Suspending Mr. Trump’s account would be censorship. Though Twitter is legally free to censor whomever it wants, it also has a duty to recognize how its actions affect the larger world.

The repercussions could be vast. As online services like Twitter become the world’s primary place for political dialogue, the rules they set up for policing political speech will have a wide-ranging impact — they could be used to ban not just billionaire presidents-elect, but also activists and dissidents across the globe.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/14/technology/twitter-has-the-right-to-suspend-donald-trump-but-it-shouldnt.html


I got to say I agree with the NY Times here. Donald Trump *SHOULD* be suspended because he is going to be the next president, but Twitter should not be the one to do it. His supporters would go apeshiit.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. Twitter as the primary place for political dialogue?
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:21 PM
Dec 2016

And who made that determination? It sounds as if the NY TImes is making a case to delegitimize and diminish the rest of the media in favor of an online forum that is only accessed by a minority of citizens.

If Trump wants to communicate he can always call a press conference.

So I disagree. Let Twitter suspend his account and let Trump takes his chances with the media.

niyad

(113,581 posts)
2. "free speech advocates argue that Twitters policies ought to give great deference to political
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:23 PM
Dec 2016

figures"??????? what a load of codswallop. WHY should "political figures" be given "great deference"??? really? that kind of "thinking" smacks of a dictatorship--"all hail the great leader".

Initech

(100,104 posts)
5. Yeah big difference between Obama Tweets and Trump Tweets:
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:27 PM
Dec 2016


Vs:



Big difference! Maybe all the times of Trump calling the NY Times "failing" got to them?

niyad

(113,581 posts)
3. twitter is a company, not a government institution. therefore, according to the lovers of the
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:25 PM
Dec 2016

"unfettered, unregulated free market", it should be able to cancel whichever accounts it pleases.

oops, sorry, folks, you forgot it works both ways, yes? and you also forgot that the whole "free speech" think is about GOVERNMENT interfering with free speech, not businesses or other people.

no_hypocrisy

(46,193 posts)
4. Twitter COULD suspend RealDonaldTrump but
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:26 PM
Dec 2016

he'd just transfer to POTUS Twitter account (provided things don't go swimmingly on Monday).

Buns_of_Fire

(17,197 posts)
7. On the other hand, when @RealComradeTrump sends an asshole tweet,
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 02:05 PM
Dec 2016

any number of @RealOrdinaryCitizens can immediately talk right back to him (#ComradeTrump) and demonstrate what a complete asscarrot (Pathetic! Loser!) he is in front of God 'n' Everybody -- not an option at a press conference, of course.

Initech

(100,104 posts)
9. And Trump does seem to break the first rule of social media on an almost daily basis.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 02:09 PM
Dec 2016

Which is don't say anything that you'll regret later. And we can expect a lot of that over the next four years.

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
8. Never interrupt your enemy when he is making mistake after mistake after mistake . . . .
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 02:09 PM
Dec 2016

Tweet on, asshole. Keep digging.

Initech

(100,104 posts)
10. True!
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 02:12 PM
Dec 2016

We're witnessing genocide happening in Syria right now and Donald Trump is more concerned that Vanity Fair is being mean to him. And when you're in a hole, actually Donald Trump should keep digging!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Twitter Is Within Ri...