Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The world wept for Paris but for Aleppo.......the silence is deafening (Original Post) Quixote1818 Dec 2016 OP
Everything is perspective malaise Dec 2016 #1
Bush, FOR SURE.... Absolutely no question... pangaia Dec 2016 #3
Sykes-Picot? guillaumeb Dec 2016 #6
right.....DUH !!! pangaia Dec 2016 #7
True. And it all revolved around actual control of the Middle East. guillaumeb Dec 2016 #8
True that, Who's the 'good guys' and who's the 'bad guys'... pangaia Dec 2016 #9
And when the Kurds are considered the good guys and the bad guys guillaumeb Dec 2016 #26
My brain is like a smoke-filled niche. pangaia Dec 2016 #27
That can be a good thing, depending on the source of the smoke. guillaumeb Dec 2016 #28
Obviously, heh, heh... pangaia Dec 2016 #30
Well there's a lot of history malaise Dec 2016 #23
And we didn't even mention India. pangaia Dec 2016 #25
A Presidential candidate, Gary Johnson, had never heard of it HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #2
Think of what happened in Bosnia - if it's Muslims no one cares RainCaster Dec 2016 #4
Aleppo has literally been front page headline news all over the world for the past month oberliner Dec 2016 #5
not in the US JI7 Dec 2016 #10
It has been on the front page of the NY Times daily oberliner Dec 2016 #13
not on tv JI7 Dec 2016 #15
It has been covered extensively on every TV news network oberliner Dec 2016 #17
It's also been covered extensively on the PBS Newshour. greatauntoftriplets Dec 2016 #22
When you look at the bigger picture the best thing we can do for Aleppo is to keep Trump out of 1AM Coffee Dec 2016 #11
If that is the case, Assad and Russia will have killed off ISIS by Jan 21st LeftInTX Dec 2016 #16
The Syrian Arab Army (government) kills Islamic State. David__77 Dec 2016 #31
I may be wrong, but I got my info from Wikipedia LeftInTX Dec 2016 #34
The government armed forces aren't very strong in my opinion. David__77 Dec 2016 #35
Thanks for responding. You seem to have studied the complicated issue more in-depth LeftInTX Dec 2016 #36
You're welcome! It's a challenging subject for me. David__77 Dec 2016 #37
Gee, should'a thought of that in early November. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2016 #21
Okay, name the last major fashion show that was held in Aleppo. KamaAina Dec 2016 #12
This is such a BS post oberliner Dec 2016 #14
Its the age of maggot MFM008 Dec 2016 #18
generally agree dembotoz Dec 2016 #19
If it's a Shiite mosque, I imagine the perspective will be interesting. David__77 Dec 2016 #32
It breaks my heart. smirkymonkey Dec 2016 #20
If you think the world has been silent on Aleppo, you haven't been listening. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2016 #24
I think there's been adequate coverage of Aleppo True Dough Dec 2016 #29
We only weep when muslims do the killing Generator Dec 2016 #33

malaise

(268,967 posts)
1. Everything is perspective
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 10:15 PM
Dec 2016

I've heard people pointing out that we never saw this type of coverage and condemnation from M$Greedia when the Americans were slaughtering Iraqis. It's all a fugging mess - created by George Bush.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
3. Bush, FOR SURE.... Absolutely no question...
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 10:31 PM
Dec 2016

But doesn't it go back even farther?

I mean, without going back 5000 years or more, in the 'modern' history of the ME, would you agree that the Sykes–Picot Agreement in 1916 was, if not THE cause, at least a major cause of much that has happened since?

I am not very historically well-informed about ME history, a shortcoming I have started to try to correct, along with an interest in China from the 1911 (and earlier, actually) to 1949.


guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
6. Sykes-Picot?
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 10:57 PM
Dec 2016

Yet another example of colonialists dividing what was not theirs with no regard for historic, linguistic, tribal, and religious differences. What could possibly go wrong when that happens?

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
8. True. And it all revolved around actual control of the Middle East.
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:02 PM
Dec 2016

The US simply replaced Europe in the equation as the controller.

Syria is another battleground where proxy armies fight.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
9. True that, Who's the 'good guys' and who's the 'bad guys'...
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:18 PM
Dec 2016

Are there any "good guys?"

I wish I knew.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
26. And when the Kurds are considered the good guys and the bad guys
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 01:05 PM
Dec 2016

by the US and Turkey respectively, and the US and Turkey are NATO members and allies..?

malaise

(268,967 posts)
23. Well there's a lot of history
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Dec 2016

Still in recent history the European power grab created even more instability. The Brits were merciless racists.

RainCaster

(10,869 posts)
4. Think of what happened in Bosnia - if it's Muslims no one cares
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 10:34 PM
Dec 2016

The Holocaust Museum says "never again", but Israel looked the other way in both cases. But to be fair, there appears to be little help from oil rich Muslim countries either.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. Aleppo has literally been front page headline news all over the world for the past month
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 10:38 PM
Dec 2016

It is the international story that everyone is talking about.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
13. It has been on the front page of the NY Times daily
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:31 PM
Dec 2016

It has been covered extensively in the US. There is not another international story that has gotten nearly as much coverage.

There has also been a great deal of social media information about Aleppo, from Facebook to Twitter and elsewhere.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
17. It has been covered extensively on every TV news network
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 12:37 AM
Dec 2016

ABC:

http://abcnews.go.com/International/orphaned-children-aleppo-plead-evacuation-video/story?id=44218270

CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/17/middleeast/aleppo-syria-evacuation-agreement-reached/index.html

There are dozens of videos on each network.

This is in spite of the difficulty in getting US reporters and camera operators to the scene (as opposed to Paris where there was much greater access).

To say that "the world's silence is deafening" with regard to Aleppo is just absolute nonsense. The BBC and other networks across Europe have also had daily extensive coverage of what is going on there.

 

1AM Coffee

(27 posts)
11. When you look at the bigger picture the best thing we can do for Aleppo is to keep Trump out of
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:27 PM
Dec 2016

office
http://www.newsweek.com/syrias-assad-says-donald-trump-could-be-natural-ally-against-extremism-532215

I think Assad is a bad guy, a very bad guy, all right?

I don't like Assad at all. But Assad is killing ISIS. Russia is killing ISIS.


The diplomatic equivalent of "I'm not racist but"

LeftInTX

(25,289 posts)
16. If that is the case, Assad and Russia will have killed off ISIS by Jan 21st
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:45 PM
Dec 2016

But, Assad is not killing ISIS. Russia is not killing ISIS.

Assad benefits from ISIS. Assad wants to kill rebels and suppress uprisings. Assad knows that Donald is stupid.

David__77

(23,372 posts)
31. The Syrian Arab Army (government) kills Islamic State.
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 02:23 PM
Dec 2016

The army in Deir Ezzor has been facing encirclement by Islamic State for years - and there have been many deaths on both sides. Kweires Airbase faced a similar encirclement by Islamic State, and the government broke the siege, fighting Islamic State. It's silly to claim the government forces don't kill Islamic State.

LeftInTX

(25,289 posts)
34. I may be wrong, but I got my info from Wikipedia
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 02:55 PM
Dec 2016

During the Syrian Civil War, multiple opposition and anti-Assad parties in the conflict have accused Assad of collusion with ISIS; several sources have claimed that ISIS prisoners were strategically released from Syrian prisons at the beginning of the Syrian Civil War in 2011.[190] The Assad government has also reportedly bought oil directly from both ISIS and al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front.[119] United States Secretary of State John Kerry has stated that the Assad government has tactically avoided ISIS forces in order to weaken moderate opposition such as the Free Syrian Army,[191] as well as "even purposely ceding some territory to them [ISIS] in order to make them more of a problem so he can make the argument that he is somehow the protector against them".[192] A Jane's Defence Weekly database analysis confirmed that only a small percentage of the Syrian government's attacks were targeted at ISIS in 2014.[182]

snip...

Analyst Noah Bonsey of the International Crisis Group has suggested that ISIS are politically expedient for Assad, as "the threat of ISIS provides a way out [for Assad] because the regime believes that over time the U.S. and other countries backing the opposition will eventually conclude that the regime is a necessary partner on the ground in confronting this jihadi threat",

snip....

On 1 June 2015, the United States stated that the Assad government was "making air-strikes in support" of an ISIS advance on Syrian opposition positions north of Aleppo

snip....

In 2016, Syrian Democratic Forces found paperwork at a recently captured oil refinery during the al-Shaddadi offensive suggesting that ISIS had sold oil directly to the Assad regime, with a SDF commander stating; "The regime says that it's fighting terrorists, but it's not really. In fact, it's always maintained economic ties. Bashar Assad controls nothing anymore and he has a massive logistical lead in terms of oil especially so he's bought oil from the jihadists, and in return, he's supplied them with weapons".[217]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashar_al-Assad (From section entitled Al-Qaeda and ISIS)

Here are a few articles here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/09/29/the-islamic-state-and-assad-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/?utm_term=.ed4c0b7b8ec1

http://time.com/3719129/assad-isis-asset/

______________________________________

I also have my own personal opinion: If Assad is capable of killing all these civilians, isn't he capable of killing ISIS? Couldn't he have wiped them out? Also he can point to ISIS as a reason to continue his civil war. If ISIS was wiped out, then the West would have a reason to go after him directly.

I could be totally wrong......


David__77

(23,372 posts)
35. The government armed forces aren't very strong in my opinion.
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 04:04 PM
Dec 2016

I think the government has focused on consolidating control of large cities, other than those in the east for which it would be logisticllly difficult to contend. I do not think the Syrian government and allied forces have the power now to seize the areas occupied by Islamic State without leaving its own territory vulnerable to the non-Islamic State insurgents. Perhaps they will after eliminating pockets of insurgents near the capital and generally penning the insurgents in in Idlib, and perhaps after Mosul campaign is over some Iraqi militia may come assist government forces in Syria.

In my opinion, the best of the insurgents are found in the Syrian Democratic Forces, and they are not fighting the government; in fact, they are tactically allied with it in some cases.

LeftInTX

(25,289 posts)
36. Thanks for responding. You seem to have studied the complicated issue more in-depth
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 04:17 PM
Dec 2016

It is not an easy issue to tackle.

David__77

(23,372 posts)
37. You're welcome! It's a challenging subject for me.
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 04:44 PM
Dec 2016

This is a many-faceted war. I prefer to hang back from making definitive conclusions. That said, I do hope that an Islamic state doesn't take control of Syria. I hope that Alawites, Christians, and Shiites have full freedom to practice their religions and maintain their identities. I hope that women be free to unveil, to be educated and assume positions of power in society. I hope people have freedom to speak and study in their languages and celebrate their cultural heritage. I hope that the poor and poorer regions are not left behind in the course of economic development.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
14. This is such a BS post
Sat Dec 17, 2016, 11:32 PM
Dec 2016

If you think the world is silent with respect to Aleppo then you are not listening.

dembotoz

(16,802 posts)
19. generally agree
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 08:46 AM
Dec 2016

there is a prayer service at a city mosque today i was pondering going to....
will see if my car starts in the cold

True Dough

(17,303 posts)
29. I think there's been adequate coverage of Aleppo
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 01:22 PM
Dec 2016

My question is how the problem can be brought to an end? Other than the "rebel" fighters being defeated and those suspected of aiding/sympathizing with the rebels being slaughtered, sadly, what can the U.S. or any of its allies do to help the people of Syria?

John Kerry has taken a few stabs at this thing but he's not holding a strong hand.

I get tired of hearing the Rethug's repeatedly insisting that Obama's strategy has been a disaster. Okay, but how would you have acted successfully and what is the game plan that the "brilliant" Donald J. Drumpf is going to devise???

 

Generator

(7,770 posts)
33. We only weep when muslims do the killing
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 02:25 PM
Dec 2016

not when Muslims are killed. Are they even human? That's what many people in this shitass country think. People are not good. In fact they are mostly evil. Sorry but I think a couple world wars and the holocaust taught me that. We only live in fantasy and can't face the truth.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The world wept for Paris ...