General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUgh. Kellyanne Conway on Rachel tonight.
Rachel is a horrible interviewer. She gets flustered, she giggles, and she forgets to ask the follow up question.
Kellyanne Conway is going to run right over her.
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)nolabear
(42,001 posts)Rachel slows down, asks details, is open enough to get calmer, less defensive answers. I don't know if Kellyanne even has the ability to actually engage any more but if anyone can get her to talk rather than spin, I think Rachel can. And on a personal note, I like the laugh.
Horse with no Name
(33,958 posts)if not, I will be turning the channel.
C_U_L8R
(45,029 posts)Even Rachel. If Kellyanne is going to lie and spin IN your face,
you've gotta call her out. Hard and often.
bdamomma
(63,941 posts)but I will not watch that stupid Kellyanne.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)I don't care if Rachel is a good interviewer or not, Conway is repulsive.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)She's still campaigning against Hillary.
She was asked about a comment she made during the campaign about Hillary not talking to the press.
She went on for quite a while whining about Hillary instead of explaining why Trump hasn't held press conferences.
They gave her a pass.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)I puke at the thought of listening to her for more than a second.
BigDemVoter
(4,157 posts)There is NOTHING, NOTHING, N-O-T-H-I-N-G to be gained from having that motor-mouthed automaton yapping away. Absolutely NADA.
Rachel shouldn't waste her time or breath or ours either. I won't watch Rachel anymore.
Raine
(30,541 posts)Dumpster as her president. No comeback on Dumpster's & rethugs refusal to accept Obama as lawful president!