General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm proud of President Obama for NOT vetoing that UN resolution.
Whatever else you can say about the I/P situation, there is no reason the US should have to defend further settlement construction in order to prove that we are "pro-Israel".
The settlements are indefensible and do nothing but make the situation worse.
NO US president should EVER have defended the settlement project or its expansion.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Interested to see how Trump will behave. The GOP loves to suck up to Israeli hawks but his buddy Putin is down with both Syria and Iran.
yup yup
Gothmog
(145,631 posts)I find the man to be unpleasant
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Faux pas
(14,695 posts)it!
LeftishBrit
(41,212 posts)Dear (LeftishBrit)
Last night the United Nations Security Council voted in support of a resolution calling on Israel to cease all settlement activity in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, alongside demanding immediate steps to prevent acts of violence against all civilians. The resolution firmly recognises the legitimacy of Israel and reiterates the importance of urgently pursuing diplomatic efforts in order to achieve a just and lasting peace in the region. The final text can be read in full here.
The entire Security Council, including the UK voted in support of the resolution, with the exception of the USA, who made a bold decision not to exercise its power to veto it, ensuring it could pass. On Thursday, we wrote to the Boris Johnson MP, the British Foreign Minister, asking the UK to back the vote on the basis that it presents an historic opportunity to put resolving the conflict back at the top of the international agenda, where it is fast being overshadowed by other issues. Whilst the resolution highlights the damage ongoing settlement construction is doing to the prospects of reaching a political resolution based on two-states for two-peoples, it also provides balance by recognising that ceasing settlement building must go hand in hand by stopping acts of violence and terror.
We believe the settlements are gravely endangering the prospects of reaching a political resolution based on two-states for two-peoples and we support efforts to prevent their ongoing expansion. We know this is a view shared widely in our community. According to extensive academic research into British Jewish attitudes towards Israel conducted in 2015 by City University and Ipsos Mori, which was funded by Yachad, 75% of British Jews agree that the expansion of settlements on the West Bank is a major obstacle to peace. 68% of respondents went so far as to say that they agree with the statement I feel a sense of despair every time Israel approves further expansion of settlements
We believe that the UK has acted in Israel's best long term interests and we are grateful for our government's ongoing commitment to two-states for two peoples.
Wishing you all a Happy Chanukah and peaceful new year,
Hannah Weisfeld
Director, Yachad
SCantiGOP
(13,874 posts)No one wants to see Israel's security threatened, but the humanity of the people in the Occupied Territories and their right not to live in a system of Apartheid must also be remembered.
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)I'm Jewish and I see nothing but dark times ahead, for sure. Building more of those ugly settlements are insane. Endless war and conflict.
Gothmog
(145,631 posts)Gothmog
(145,631 posts)The US was correct to refuse to veto this resolution.