General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm Back. And I Was Right.
Assange, Snowden, Trump, Putin, Manning, Greenwald.
Ain't been wrong yet.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)tblue37
(65,391 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Perhaps you missed that legendary thread. It was epic......like the moon bombing thread.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)for all those unfamiliar with the inside baseball aspects of this board.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)Was the thread title something like "Is SidDithers Skinner?"
Is this the right thread?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026266129
bravenak
(34,648 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cha
(297,274 posts)you distinctly on those threads.. I was very grateful for your posts.
Especially greenwald, assange, putin, and snowden.
Back!
Response to msanthrope (Original post)
CountAllVotes This message was self-deleted by its author.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Response to msanthrope (Reply #4)
CountAllVotes This message was self-deleted by its author.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Although no trial is perfect, Peltiers was unusually troublesome, particularly when viewed with the benefit of hindsight. The case against Peltier was a moving target, which shifted from a deliberate ambush theory in the earlier trial of Peltiers co-defendants (who were found not guilty) to a deliberate execution at Peltiers subsequent trial before a different judge, and then to an accomplice theory on appeal.
As an aider and abettor, according to the governments theory, Peltier was guilty of the murders because he was present, and he had a weapon. It was a very thin case that likely would not be upheld by courts today. It is a gross overstatement to label Peltier a cold-blooded murderer on the basis of the minimal proof that survived the appeals in his case.
Following the conclusion of the appeals, Judge Gerald Heaney, an Eighth Circuit judge who sat on two of the appeals, took the extraordinary step of writing to the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs urging it to grant clemency to Peltier in 1991.
Considering all of the surrounding factors, including the prevailing worldview of the time, the FBIs role in the creation of dangerous conditions on Pine Ridge, the manner in which the case was investigated and prosecuted and the extraordinary length of time already served, in my opinion, Peltier should be released in the interests of justice.
The government has gotten almost 41 years, and 41 pounds of flesh; Peltier is old and sick, and in my opinion, any more time served would be vindictive.
Response to uppityperson (Reply #17)
CountAllVotes This message was self-deleted by its author.
G_j
(40,367 posts)so very sad
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)His co-defendant were aquitted. Running seriously jeopardized his chances. Had he stood trial when he was charged originally, he would have stood a great chance of the same.
Do I think he has served enough? Yes.....he has paid. If BHO pardons him, I won't regret it.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Just Theory, not reality.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)enough time served. I won't regret a pardon.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)Your voice has been missed.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Moosepoop
(1,920 posts)Welcome back!!!
Narcissistic?
Love the loud parade!
Hekate
(90,706 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,986 posts)Love the irony
Hekate
(90,706 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)where you left it.
It's like the Hotel California . . . "you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave . . ."
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)betsuni
(25,535 posts)I trust smart people who are right about things, they do not grow on trees.
still_one
(92,204 posts)brush
(53,782 posts)JI7
(89,250 posts)and yes, it has come out now but if one actually paid attention then they would have seen it before also.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)sagesnow
(2,824 posts)on the Left to stay.
No flip floppers here!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Hekate
(90,706 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)I remember distinctly your putting down of certain posters who were worried about the GE.
Your favorite response was "Thanks for your concern."
It wasn't me, but I saw you do it often.
So anyway.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)45...not him.
I was right.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)She is not the president.
You were wrong to chide people on their concerns that this might happen.
It happened.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Yeah - there's that.
ProfessorGAC
(65,057 posts)Good to see you back.
ismnotwasm
(41,986 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Gothmog
(145,291 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)If you were so right, why did you go away?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)needed to focus on that.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Greenwald will do anything to get hits and Assange still has never had Wikileaks put up anything damaging to Putin.
However, I have made a few mistakes and been wrong a few times over the years.
herding cats
(19,564 posts)I'm sure I missed some, but one extremely well sourced and researched post by you taught me a lot. It took me a weekend to get through all the articles, but I still learned a lot in the process!
Welcome back!