Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaura Healey Is Suing the President Again
Photo via AP
Maura Healey isnt messing around. Sounding the alarm about the impact of Donald Trumps executive order on immigration and describing it as Islamophobia run amok, the Massachusetts attorney general announced today that her office is challenging the move in court.
Healey announced Tuesday that the state is joining a lawsuit taking on the legality of the order, which suspended the countrys refugee program and temporarily banned people from seven Muslim-majority nations from traveling to the U.S. The ban initially included those who already had lived and worked in the country legally. The suit was filed by the ACLU on behalf of two Iranian UMass Dartmouth professors who were detained for hours on Saturday night, despite having authorization to live and work here.
The move came with a sharply worded news release and press conference, and its clear shes trying to send a message to the White House:
Harm to our institutions, our citizens, and our businesses is harm to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Presidents executive order is a threat to our Constitution. Rather than protecting our national security, it stigmatizes those who would lawfully emigrate to our state. With this policy, our global universities, hospitals, businesses and start-ups, and far too many students and residents have been put at risk. On behalf of the Commonwealth, my office is challenging the immigration ban to hold this administration accountable for its un-American, discriminatory, and reckless decision-making.
Read More: http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2017/01/31/maura-healey-suing-president-trump/
_________________________________
OMG! Gov Charlie Baker -R supports this! This is great.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1114 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maura Healey Is Suing the President Again (Original Post)
sheshe2
Jan 2017
OP
mainer
(12,022 posts)1. Women seem to be at the forefront of this fight for justice.
Maura Healey. Sally Yates. Elizabeth Warren. Ann Donnelly.
And all those pink pussyhats.
Thank god for those with the ovaries and courage to lead the way.
sheshe2
(83,755 posts)2. I am proud to say
that I voted for both Maura Healey and Elizabeth Warren.
mopinko
(70,102 posts)3. but you just cant trust women
to fall in line w authoritarians. damn them.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)4. Maura Healy is a rock star
and an inspiration.
But can't say much of anything about
that lump of nothing Charlie Baker.
Yup, not much to say about Charlie. Perhaps be should take a ride on the MTA and never return.
Maura however is a keeper.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)5. Meanwhile, the NRA is suing her and Governor Charlie Baker...what fun!
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/01/23/mass-chapter-nra-targets-state-assault-weapons-ban-federal-lawsuit-against-healey/IX7YTBuknWbWxM7BFDJ8LO/story.html
The Massachusetts affiliate of the National Rifle Association on Monday sued Governor Charlie Baker and Attorney General Maura Healey, contending the states ban on assault weapons is unlawful and should be declared void and unenforceable.