Should any Democrat who votes for Gorsuch be marked as a collaborator?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

12 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	9 (75%)
	No
	3 (25%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Demit]

1. I don't think you should use that kind of language yet.

[First Speaker]

5. That depends on where you think we are as a nation...

...if this is just politics as usual--even on steroids--then the term is not appropriate. If you think this is 1776, 1861, 1941--then the term is very appropriate indeed. The latter is my belief.

[scscholar]

2. Same with the Mattis collaborators

Which was 98-1, with only Sen. Kirsten Gilliband (D-NY) voting reasonably.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

3. During the campaign Mattis indicated he would serve in a Democratic or Republicant administration.

[TrekLuver]

4. I think they should put him through the ringer but then "pretend" to collaborate...yes by

collaborating but I would put it out there that the Democrats are going to put "partisanship aside" and work with their Republican "colleagues" on this nomination. Even though this seat was stolen and our Republican colleagues would not work with us and would not work for the American people we have decided that we are not going to stoop to their level. The we go high when they go low bullcrap. I know most of you don't feel this way.

If Democrats successfully block (which I can't see that happening) then what happens...does Trashbag nominate someone else? It that Pryor guy and people like him that have me very concerned.

[WheelWalker]

6. It is a seat on the Court stolen by the last Senate. Any Senator who now supports any

nominee other than M. Garland is an accomplice to the theft after the fact.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7. As well as consorting with the enemy.