Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 09:39 PM Feb 2017

Melania's lawyers admit she hoped to cash in on being First Lady by selling clothes, fragrances

Melania Trump’s lawyers admit she hoped to cash in on being First Lady by selling clothes and fragrances

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/melania-trumps-lawyers-admit-she-hoped-to-cash-in-on-being-first-lady-by-selling-clothes-and-fragrances/



First Lady Melania Trump has filed a third lawsuit against The Daily Mail for defamation after the site published a story alleging Mrs. Trump had been an “escort” at one time. As the lawsuit has moved forward, Mrs. Trump was required to prove that the defamation damaged her in some way. Her example of damages are that she can no longer launch a clothing and fragrance line using her office as First Lady of the United States.

According to a report from the New York Post, the court documents allege the Daily Mail caused such financial harm that Mrs. Trump could no longer use her position in government to enrich herself, her brand and products.

“Plaintiff had the unique, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, as an extremely famous and well-known person…to launch a broad-based commercial brand in multiple product categories, each of which could have garnered multi-million dollar business relationships for a multi-year term during which plaintiff is one of the most photographed women in the world,” the lawsuit outlines.

“These product categories would have included, among other things, apparel, accessories, shoes, jewelry, cosmetics, hair care, skin care and fragrance,” it continues.
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Melania's lawyers admit she hoped to cash in on being First Lady by selling clothes, fragrances (Original Post) Miles Archer Feb 2017 OP
And yet, qwlauren35 Feb 2017 #1
boycott it is onetexan Feb 2017 #26
Damn. These people don't care about anything other than money. Laurian Feb 2017 #2
truer words were never spoken rurallib Feb 2017 #3
They. Are. Grifters. madokie Feb 2017 #17
+1,000 malaise Feb 2017 #46
What is wrong with these people? madaboutharry Feb 2017 #4
She's suing in the UK TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #13
i am talking about Melania benefiting from her position as First Lady madaboutharry Feb 2017 #15
Is she? TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #16
Part of her complaint is that now she can't. madaboutharry Feb 2017 #18
What I'm asking is, is she prohibited from profiting TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #19
The Constitution prohibits using your official role/position in government madaboutharry Feb 2017 #20
The claim isn't that she is using her position in government Ms. Toad Feb 2017 #27
I think you are correct fescuerescue Feb 2017 #45
Because her 'reputation' has been tarnished. Volaris Feb 2017 #36
I'm not sure about that fescuerescue Feb 2017 #44
Grifters Gotta Grift FSogol Feb 2017 #5
Ain't it the truth! Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2017 #8
grifters irisblue Feb 2017 #6
was it ever determined to be true? starshine00 Feb 2017 #7
She makes Sarah Failin look like an amateur. lpbk2713 Feb 2017 #9
Birds of a feather, we see you. JudyM Feb 2017 #10
To Hell with morals and ehics, it just might be legal Brother Buzz Feb 2017 #11
Leave her alone! Glamrock Feb 2017 #12
How about a fragrance line called "Escort me"? milestogo Feb 2017 #14
for someone selling high end skin care products fierywoman Feb 2017 #21
Her eyes are also a weird shape... jmowreader Feb 2017 #22
Maybe she really, really likes raccoons Retrograde Feb 2017 #24
Facelift? Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #28
She's had at least one, but I don't think that's the cause of this jmowreader Feb 2017 #29
I don't really know, but here is a before-after Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #31
There was no medical intervention dalton99a Feb 2017 #32
Just surgical... 3catwoman3 Feb 2017 #35
Who needs the "medical intervention" is her useless husband jmowreader Feb 2017 #39
they pull the skin any tighter MFM008 Feb 2017 #41
Such an oportunistic grifter! FailureToCommunicate Feb 2017 #23
Tacky, tacky Retrograde Feb 2017 #25
Well, we've seen more of her... 3catwoman3 Feb 2017 #37
I hope the cash me outside merch line out sells her stuff lunasun Feb 2017 #30
So the new flotus pet project is logosoco Feb 2017 #33
But, but, but, marybourg Feb 2017 #34
Trump needs to trade her in. WhiteTara Feb 2017 #38
This is just beyond surreal. Guilded Lilly Feb 2017 #40
Gooooooldigger, she's the one, the one with the Midas touch, oasis Feb 2017 #42
The whole damned family has the same expectations -- why not Melania as well? Grifters all. Hekate Feb 2017 #43

onetexan

(13,072 posts)
26. boycott it is
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:38 PM
Feb 2017

not that we didn't know that was the case - that not only Melania but the rest of their clan would usurp their idiot husband/father's office to enrich themselves - but to blatantly spell it out like that is just despicable.

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
2. Damn. These people don't care about anything other than money.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 09:43 PM
Feb 2017

More and more and more. The whole clan is disgusting.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,228 posts)
13. She's suing in the UK
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:31 PM
Feb 2017

Their libel laws may be different from ours. I think a case could be made that the Trump brand is no longer as valuble as it once was. She's already tried a jewelry line on QVC, but it must not have done too well because it was discontinued.

She was also developing a skin care line that had caviar in it. She said she rubs it all over Barron's body every night. But that ended up with her suing the cosmetics company for $50M.

Grifters gotta grift.

madaboutharry

(40,238 posts)
15. i am talking about Melania benefiting from her position as First Lady
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:36 PM
Feb 2017

She is prohibited from using her position for personal gain and sell clothes, fragrances, jewelry, etc.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,228 posts)
19. What I'm asking is, is she prohibited from profiting
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:52 PM
Feb 2017

from being FLOTUS? I realize it's in poor taste, but I remember "Billy Beer" during the Carter administration. Embarrassing for Jimmy yes, but I don't think family members are prohibited, although a case could be made that he benefits from any money she makes because of community property.

madaboutharry

(40,238 posts)
20. The Constitution prohibits using your official role/position in government
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:55 PM
Feb 2017

for personal gain. It applies to the President's family.

Ms. Toad

(34,117 posts)
27. The claim isn't that she is using her position in government
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:43 PM
Feb 2017

but that for the next few years she will be one of the most photographed women in the world.

She hoped to grow her business based on this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

I agree that she can't use government property for personal gain (like the brief advertisement on Whitehouse.gov) - but I don't believe she has an official role/position in government just because she happens to be married to the president. The First Lady and First Children titles and duties are ceremonial, not official.

Do you have a cite for your assertion?

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
45. I think you are correct
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 04:58 AM
Feb 2017

FOTUS is ceremonial role. unpaid, and not defined in law or constitution.

It's not as if you could ever impeach or fire the first lady or first children.

Volaris

(10,275 posts)
36. Because her 'reputation' has been tarnished.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 12:24 AM
Feb 2017

If I were the judge, I would tell her to discuss that with her husband, and then promptly kick her the hell out of my courtroom.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
44. I'm not sure about that
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 04:56 AM
Feb 2017

I don't think the position of First Lady is a formal role. Not defined in law or in the constitution.

 

starshine00

(531 posts)
7. was it ever determined to be true?
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 09:48 PM
Feb 2017

I mean, I guess, could it be proven since anyone with a brain could figure out the truth. I think her nude photos online may have damaged her credibility more than her having been an escort...

Retrograde

(10,168 posts)
24. Maybe she really, really likes raccoons
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:26 PM
Feb 2017

and wants to look like one. She has the weirdest eye makeup - and for someone who has access to big bucks she comes across looking cheap.

jmowreader

(50,569 posts)
29. She's had at least one, but I don't think that's the cause of this
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:56 PM
Feb 2017

If you look at the picture, her bottom lids are going up when they should be going down. (And this isn't the only picture where you see that.) It looks like she was born this way.

jmowreader

(50,569 posts)
39. Who needs the "medical intervention" is her useless husband
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 12:32 AM
Feb 2017

I'm thinking butterfly nets and pounds of Thorazine.

Retrograde

(10,168 posts)
25. Tacky, tacky
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:28 PM
Feb 2017

I miss having someone with real class in the White House.

BTW, how is she going to be one of "the most photographed women in the world" holed up in the Manhattan tower on our dimes?

3catwoman3

(24,079 posts)
37. Well, we've seen more of her...
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 12:27 AM
Feb 2017

...epidermis than any other FLOTUS. If you total up square inches of skin displayed, she would win even if there were never another photo taken of her.

Her eyes are very odd looking. Almost like she can't open them all the way.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
33. So the new flotus pet project is
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 12:20 AM
Feb 2017

Personal profit! That is sure to make America great!

Wow! And this is actually in court documents? Interesting.

I wonder how the folks who made fun of Michelle Obama for trying to get kids to exercise and eat right will react to this news!

marybourg

(12,643 posts)
34. But, but, but,
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 12:22 AM
Feb 2017

how about Michelle Obama growing a vegetable garden on the WH grounds! You lib'ruls didn't complain about that! And SHE wore a sleeveless dress! But the lying press just ignored that!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Melania's lawyers admit s...