Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 08:58 AM Feb 2017

I Was on the National Security Council. Bannon Doesnt Belong There.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/06/opinion/i-was-on-the-national-security-council-bannon-doesnt-belong-there.html?_r=0

I Was on the National Security Council. Bannon Doesn’t Belong There.

By MICHAEL G. MULLEN
FEB. 6, 2017

snip//

Having Mr. Bannon as a voting member of the principals committee will have a negative influence on what is supposed to be candid, nonpartisan deliberation. I fear that it will have a chilling effect on deliberations and, potentially, diminish the authority and the prerogatives to which Senate-confirmed cabinet officials are entitled. They, unlike Mr. Bannon, are accountable for the advice they give and the policies they execute.

Consistent though Mr. Bannon’s presence may be with the predilections of our new president, it results in a blurring of presidential responsibilities — Republican Party leader and commander in chief — that is unhealthy for the republic.

I’m perfectly aware that political concerns color the national security decisions that any president makes. The invasion of Iraq, the surge in Afghanistan, air operations over Libya, sanctions on Russia and, of course, the decision not to strike Syria after President Bashar al-Assad crossed Mr. Obama’s “red line” on chemical weapons were all informed — if not dominated — by political calculations.

But those decisions were made outside the confines of the Situation Room, where the security council meets. I cannot remember a single instance during my four-year stint as chairman of the Joint Chiefs where it was otherwise. That’s the way it should be.

Every president has the right and the responsibility to shape the security council as he sees fit. But partisan politics has no place at that table. And neither does Mr. Bannon.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Was on the National Security Council. Bannon Doesnt Belong There. (Original Post) babylonsister Feb 2017 OP
Kick Cha Feb 2017 #1
Kick gademocrat7 Feb 2017 #2
KNR AgadorSparticus Feb 2017 #3
50 USC Section 3021 Mike Niendorff Feb 2017 #4

Mike Niendorff

(3,460 posts)
4. 50 USC Section 3021
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 01:41 AM
Feb 2017

Bannon's appointment was, and still is, a straight-up violation of federal law.

Here is the exact reference.

50 U.S. Code § 3021

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3021



MDN
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Was on the National Sec...