Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:23 PM Feb 2017

Who is going to be the Howard Baker of the Congressional Republicans?



Howard Baker, "What did the President (Nixon) know, and when did he know it?"


Chaffetz? (Don't make me laugh)

John McCain?

Lindsey Graham?

Marco Rubio?

There is no Howard Baker in this crowd. (My answer)
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who is going to be the Howard Baker of the Congressional Republicans? (Original Post) yellowcanine Feb 2017 OP
What about "Maverick Mccain"? guillaumeb Feb 2017 #1
Not "Maverick" atreides1 Feb 2017 #5
Agreed. The GOP is all about principal, not principle. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #6
I agree gopiscrap Feb 2017 #2
Corker has been making noises. He is in Baker's Senate seat redstateblues Feb 2017 #3
I've been watching closely for any sign of such courage. JohnnyLib2 Feb 2017 #4
Bottom line is if there isnt one, there is no chance Eliot Rosewater Feb 2017 #7
Every repuke in congress is a traitor. libtodeath Feb 2017 #8
Roy Blunt is at least mouthing some of the right words. Ms. Toad Feb 2017 #9
Maybe McCain. Adrahil Feb 2017 #10

atreides1

(16,076 posts)
5. Not "Maverick"
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:34 PM
Feb 2017

McCain, was gelded a long time ago! Every so often they'll let him out of his stable, so he play his old man pointing at the clouds, part! Then back he goes until the next time...

Gowdy? That useless occupier of air and space!!!

There are no Howard Baker's among the Republicans in the US Congress...this is the congress that Nixon needed!!!

With these hacks, Nixon would have finished his second term!!!

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
6. Agreed. The GOP is all about principal, not principle.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:35 PM
Feb 2017

And the corporate media will likely allow this to be quickly forgotten.

gopiscrap

(23,757 posts)
2. I agree
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:26 PM
Feb 2017

I have the sad feeling that we are just going to have to watch this nation burn itself to the ground so that we can rebuild

JohnnyLib2

(11,211 posts)
4. I've been watching closely for any sign of such courage.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:32 PM
Feb 2017

McCain comes and goes with his challenges. Otherwise--nobody. Perhaps a "sleeper" will appear, but it sure seems unlikely.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
7. Bottom line is if there isnt one, there is no chance
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:38 PM
Feb 2017

this country survives as a Democracy.

The dictator is lining things up as we speak, with the help from Putin.

McCain alone could stop this or give the patriotic side a boost that is remarkable.

John, are you a patriot or a sycophant?

Ms. Toad

(34,066 posts)
9. Roy Blunt is at least mouthing some of the right words.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:52 PM
Feb 2017
Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) on Tuesday said there should be an exhaustive investigation into the ties between Russia and the Trump administration.

"I think everybody needs that investigation to happen," Blunt told KTRS radio, CNN reported.

. . .

Blunt said the Senate Intelligence Committee should also talk to the president's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, "very soon," adding that discussion should "answer a lot of questions."

"What did he know? What did he do? And is there any reason to believe that anybody else knew that and didn't take the kind of action they should have taken?" he said.


Of course he's also saying a lot of other garbage . . .
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
10. Maybe McCain.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:56 PM
Feb 2017

I have a former colleague who is on a Senator's staff. It is well known that McCain DESPISES Trump and honestly considers him a national security risk. He doesn't know what's going to happen, but he said there are some Republicans seething. One issue for him (and others) is that fear Pence more. He is more of an ideologue, and knows how to play the political game. He could cause much more damage, so there is a rock and hard place kind of feeling.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who is going to be the Ho...