General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswhere fake news is born - CNN headline "Are Dems being paid to show up at town halls?"
Headline should be
"GOP dishonestly accuses of Dems being paid to show up at town halls. It is a lie".
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/democrats-town-halls-chaffetz/index.html
This is the type of shitty journalism that needs to end!
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)and tweet about this!
denverbill
(11,489 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)It is sensational headline, but it merely asks a question. I didn't read the story -- what was the answer?
Your alternative headline would never fly in any real news source. It is opinionated and not objective. A more proper headline would be:
GOP Claims Dems Paid for Town Hall Protests
Then, if it is a real news story, it will have interviews, lay out the facts as they are known, and reach at least a preliminary conclusion. Your headline is even more biases than the CNN headline you dislike. Sorry, I'm just being honest.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028641474
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)the headline was indeed to get your attention-- and then they hit you with the answer.
Atman
(31,464 posts)It was actually rather complimentary towards the Democrats and protesters. CNN did what all web sites are prone to do these days; phrase a headline in the form of a sensational question in an effort to make you want to click. Anyone who clicks on this one will find the answer, and it is not bad for Democrats. In fact, it was really informative, and provided all sorts of names of organizations people might be interested in joining to help organize even more protests against GOP representatives.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I am not sure why asking a question in a headline is suddenly a bad thing.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Headline writing is an ancient art and a simple thing like asking a question means the answer is likely to surprise you, at least a little.
Since they don't give an answer in the headline you are tempted to read the story, and if you are one of us pinko Commie lefty assholes, you will be presently surprised at what you learned. Things you might not have learned if the headline simply said "RW Liars Claim Protesters Paid" and you passed on the article in disgust.
The same with wingnuts who will be looking to see confirmation of their own biases, but will be gobsmacked with facts not to their liking.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)It's a propaganda technique meant to insinuate the (ridiculous) question into readers' minds, thereby granting it legitimacy.
It works especially well when the question is asked- and asked, and asked again- by sources with a reputation for honesty.
It's an old technique. I'm frankly astonished that most here aren't seeing it for what it is.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Lanius
(599 posts)A headline with the words Democrats, paid, and town halls are enough to get people talking about the possibility, which is enough to sow doubt among the low-information and non-political people.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)Don't ask stupid rhetorical questions in their headlines.
TrekLuver
(2,573 posts)ENOUGH with the fake news bullshit. You are spreading what Trashbag and Putin want...
tavernier
(12,388 posts)There's your rhetorical question headline.
MagickMuffin
(15,937 posts)Now I can move into a super McMansion!!!
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)They are so desperate for page views that they sacrifice journalistic integrity. And then those of us who value journalistic integrity start tuning out. This is the downward spiral that they have chosen to participate in. If they would focus on either consistently producing excellent journalism OR being a tabloid news source, things would go better for them. It's the in-between that is frustrating to everyone.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)I was waiting for some news outlet to wonder WHO PAID FOR THAT MEGA BUS..
We even found online ads telling their folks where there were "training sessions" being held. They provided lectures/lunches/bus trips..
not very grassrooty