Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:22 PM Feb 2017

Dumb question, but I have to ask:

So, if we send ground troops to Syria, are they going to be fighting alongside Assad's troops? Or the non-ISIS rebels? Or are we just going to go in there and do our own thing, sort of like Rambo?

And if it's with Assad, I'm assuming it would also be with you know who........

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
2. Not a dumb question, but your posing it disqualifies you from a position in Trump's
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:26 PM
Feb 2017

Administration.

At this point, three weeks in, does anyone really think Trump has any idea what he is doing?

Eugene

(61,893 posts)
3. He expects the troops to fight ISIS along side his buddy Putin's forces.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:27 PM
Feb 2017

I suspect Vlad has a nasty surprise for him.

Eyeball_Kid

(7,432 posts)
4. Knowing how Trumpy operates, they'll also have a mission of finding some good
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:28 PM
Feb 2017

real estate deals. Maybe "Trump Tower Mosul" is in the future!

Other than that, who knows? And Trumpy really doesn't care, as long as he gets something out of it. If the military becomes a reflection of Trumpy's thinking, they'll bus themselves into Syria and just maraud around with their weapons raised.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
5. You nailed why it isn't going to happen
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:29 PM
Feb 2017

Congress will definitely take back their right to override the President in matters of war.

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
6. This might help you sort it out.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:35 PM
Feb 2017

First on CNN: Four U.S. military advisers wounded in Syria

By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent

Updated 9:14 PM ET, Mon June 20, 2016

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/20/politics/us-advisers-wounded-syria/index.html

Four U.S. military advisers were lightly wounded earlier this month in northern Syria by attackers who were believed to be part of ISIS, CNN has learned.
The Pentagon has not yet spoken publicly about the June 9 incident, but several defense officials told CNN it happened when an anti-tank round was fired close to the advisers' position and exploded a vehicle near them.
The troops suffered light shrapnel wounds and are believed to have returned to duty. The officials also did not immediately know if the troops involved returned fire at the attackers.

While the attackers are believed to be ISIS, the U.S. military is not certain of their identity.
The administration's official policy is that U.S. troops are in Syria and Iraq for training, advising and assisting local forces, but that their role is not to engage in combat. They have returned fire when attacked, and have in the past moved in to assist local forces when they are under fire.
On at least five occasions, American troops have either been wounded or killed in Iraq and Syria when faced with enemy fire while training and assisting U.S.-backed forces.
The Pentagon generally does not publicly disclose when troops are wounded, officials said. Because these incidents mainly involve U.S. special operations forces, the military does not want to disclose the specific locations in which they are operating, in hopes of keeping their locations secret from ISIS.
However, when troops are killed in action, there are policies that require the Pentagon to disclose the name of the killed service member and the location where it happened.
Defense officials also said they do not disclose specific information about the health status of individual troops who have been wounded due to privacy concerns. And the officials said they may not know of every incident in which troops fire their weapons at attackers because some incidents may not rise to the level of importance of being reported to the Pentagon.






 

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
7. So those guys were assisting US backed rebels, it appears.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:42 PM
Feb 2017

Of course, that all was under Obama, who didn't have boners for brutal strongmen like Assad and Putin.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. Your impertinent questions mark you as a loser!
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:47 PM
Feb 2017

All the real he-man masters of the universe know that considerations like which side you're on and the military objectives of an invasion are for libtard snowflakes! We're the United States of Under God America, and we act to create our own reality. The rest of you beta cucks just stand aside and watch us work. Trump über alles, baby!

global1

(25,246 posts)
10. In The Short Time 45Pee Has Been In Office He Already Got One Of Our Men Killed.....
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 07:34 PM
Feb 2017

does the military really want to fight for this insane narcissist and risk getting injured or killed because he wants to look tough and keep a campaign promise?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dumb question, but I have...